Life Cycle Assessment and Environmental Life Cycle costing of a unitised regenerative fuel cell stack

被引:6
|
作者
Gulotta, Teresa Maria [1 ]
Salomone, Roberta [1 ]
Mondello, Giovanni [1 ]
Saija, Giuseppe [1 ]
Lanuzza, Francesco [1 ]
Briguglio, Nicola [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Messina, Dept Econ, Sustainabil Lab, Via Verdi 75, Messina, Italy
[2] CNR, Ist Tecnol Avanzate Energia Nicola Giordano, Salita S Lucia Contesse 5, I-98126 Messina, Italy
关键词
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA); Environmental Life Cycle Costing (ELCC); URFC; PEM; Critical Raw Material (CRM); Platinum Group Metals (PGMs); ENERGY; SYSTEM; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Environmental Life Cycle Costing (eLCC) are useful methods for evaluating the environmental, energy and economic performances of innovative energy storage technologies. By using these methods, the production process of a small Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Unitized Regenerative Fuel Cell (PEMURFC) stack has been investigated, aiming to assess its environmental, energy and economic impacts at the early design stage and to identify the contributions of its various components on these impacts. Indeed, the PEM-URFC stack includes Critical Raw Materials that affect the product's sustainability. Results show that the highest contributions are associated with the platinum group metals used for the catalyst and, to a lesser degree, the materials and energy used for the bipolar plates and porous transport layers. However, considering that the datasets for representing the impacts of one of the electrocatalysts (Iridium Ruthenium Oxide) are still missing in LCA commercial databases and literature, a sensitivity analysis is performed assuming its impact to be similar to that of other Platinum Group Metals (PGMs) extracted with them (e.g., Platinum, Nickel, Palladium, etc.). The analysis shows a high difference in results due to data and methodological assumptions, making the assimilation of Iridium Ruthenium Oxide to Rhodium the worst scenario, increasing environmental impacts by 37.54 %, energy impacts by 40.48 % and environmental price by 45.08 %. Moreover, the study identified issues for applying life cycle thinking approaches on URFC devices that must be resolved in future studies (e.g., increase the reliability of catalyst inventory data or improve guidelines on energy storage technologies).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing of unitized regenerative fuel cell: A systematic review
    Gulotta, Teresa Maria
    Salomone, Roberta
    Lanuzza, Francesco
    Saija, Giuseppe
    Mondello, Giovanni
    Ioppolo, Giuseppe
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2022, 92
  • [2] Life cycle assessment and environmental life cycle costing analysis of lignocellulosic bioethanol as an alternative transportation fuel
    Daylan, B.
    Ciliz, N.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2016, 89 : 578 - 587
  • [3] Life Cycle Assessment of a Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell Stack
    Lunghi, P.
    Bove, R.
    FUEL CELLS, 2004, 3 (04) : 224 - 230
  • [4] Environmental life cycle assessment of the nuclear fuel cycle
    SolbergJohansen, B
    Clift, R
    Jeapes, A
    1997 JUBILEE RESEARCH EVENT, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1997, : 137 - 140
  • [5] Environmental and economic assessment of gasification wastewater treatment by life cycle assessment and life cycle costing approach
    Innocenzi, Valentina
    Cantarini, Federica
    Zueva, Svetlana
    Amato, Alessia
    Morico, Barbara
    Beolchini, Francesca
    Prisciandaro, Marina
    Veglio, Francesco
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2021, 168
  • [6] A hybridised framework combining integrated methods for environmental Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing
    Miah, J. H.
    Koh, S. C. L.
    Stone, D.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 168 : 846 - 866
  • [7] Study on integrated method of life cycle assessment and life cycle costing
    State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
    Zhongguo Jixie Gongcheng, 2007, 15 (1804-1809):
  • [8] Comparative life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of lodging in the Himalaya
    Silu Bhochhibhoya
    Massimo Pizzol
    Wouter M. J. Achten
    Ramesh Kumar Maskey
    Michela Zanetti
    Raffaele Cavalli
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2017, 22 : 1851 - 1863
  • [9] Comparative life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of lodging in the Himalaya
    Bhochhibhoya, Silu
    Pizzol, Massimo
    Achten, Wouter M. J.
    Maskey, Ramesh Kumar
    Zanetti, Michela
    Cavalli, Raffaele
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (11): : 1851 - 1863
  • [10] THE ROLE OF ENVIRONMENTAL LIFE CYCLE COSTING IN SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF THE TECHNOLOGIES
    Janik, Agnieszka
    ECOLOGY, ECONOMICS, EDUCATION AND LEGISLATION CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, SGEM 2016, VOL III, 2016, : 677 - 684