Malignancy Risk of Thyroid Nodules That Are Not Classifiable by the American Thyroid Association Ultrasound Risk Stratification System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Kwon, Daniel [1 ]
Kulich, Marta [1 ]
Mack, Wendy J. [2 ]
Monedero, Rodrigo Martinez [1 ]
Joyo, Eri [3 ]
Angell, Trevor E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Keck Med, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Populat & Publ Hlth Sci, Keck Med, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Div Endocrinol & Diabet, Keck Med, 2020 Zonal Ave,IRD620, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
thyroid neoplasms; papillary thyroid cancer; ultrasound; thyroid nodule; risk stratification; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; TI-RADS; GUIDELINES; TIRADS;
D O I
10.1089/thy.2022.0672
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Sonographic evaluation is fundamental to thyroid nodule assessment. The American Thyroid Association (ATA) ultrasound risk stratification system (USRSS) is widely used, but the appearance of some nodules has been considered nonclassifiable (NC-ATA). The risk of malignancy (RoM) of NC-ATA nodules varies widely between studies, leading to uncertainty in clinical management. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the prevalence and malignancy risk of NC-ATA nodules.Methods: A systematic review was performed searching PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify original studies of thyroid nodules classified using the ATA USRSS from 2016 to 2022 and reporting the outcome of NC-ATA nodules. Meta-analysis was conducted to obtain pooled RoM estimates and meta-regression sensitivity analyses were used to explore sources of between-study heterogeneity.Results: Of 6377 screened studies, 135 underwent full-text review, and 16 studies reporting 21,271 nodules were included. Within these, the pooled prevalence of NC-ATA nodules was 7.8% (1872 nodules; [confidence interval; CI 5.1-11.1]). The pooled RoM estimate for NC-ATA nodules was 20.3% [CI 13.0-28.7] and there was significant heterogeneity between studies (I-2 = 92.8%, p < 0.001). NC-ATA nodule RoM estimates were significantly different by study type: single-center versus multicenter studies (24.8% vs. 12.3%, respectively, p = 0.031) and study design: retrospective versus prospective studies (25.1% vs. 8.5%, respectively, p = 0.003). No significant difference was observed in RoM based on inclusion of Conclusion: In this first meta-analysis comprehensively assessing the RoM of NC-ATA nodules, the malignancy risk was found to be comparable with the current ATA USRSS intermediate suspicion category. Significant heterogeneity was observed between studies and limits the interpretation of these results. In future iterations of the ATA USRSS that seek into incorporate categorization of NC-ATA nodules, these meta-analysis data may help to inform proper malignancy risk stratification. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42020182498), on July 14, 2020.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 602
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification for Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules: A Four-Tier Categorization System
    Hyobin Seo
    Dong Gyu Na
    Ji-Hoon Kim
    Kyung Won Kim
    Ji Won Yoon
    European Radiology, 2015, 25 : 2153 - 2162
  • [42] Malignancy Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules with Macrocalcification and Rim Calcification Based on Ultrasound Patterns
    Shin, Hwa Seon
    Na, Dong Gyu
    Paik, Wooyul
    Yoon, So Jin
    Gwon, Hye Yun
    Noh, Byeong-Joo
    Kim, Won Jun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (04) : 663 - 671
  • [43] Risk of Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules Using the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System in the NIFTP Era
    Rosario, Pedro Weslley
    da Silva, Alexandre Lemos
    Nunes, Mauricio Buzelin
    Ribeiro Borges, Michelle Aparecida
    HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH, 2018, 50 (10) : 735 - 737
  • [44] Malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules: comparisons of four ultrasound Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems in surgically resected nodules
    Wang, Ying
    Lei, Kai-Rong
    He, Ya-Ping
    Li, Xiao-Long
    Ren, Wei-Wei
    Zhao, Chong-Ke
    Bo, Xiao-Wan
    Wang, Dan
    Sun, Cheng-Yu
    Xu, Hui-Xiong
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [46] Use of the Kwak Thyroid Image Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS) in differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Migda, Bartosz
    Migda, Michal
    Migda, Marian S.
    Slapa, Rafal Z.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (06) : 2380 - 2388
  • [47] Can ultrasound systems for risk stratification of thyroid nodules identify follicular carcinoma?
    Castellana, Marco
    Piccardo, Arnoldo
    Virili, Camilla
    Scappaticcio, Lorenzo
    Grani, Giorgio
    Durante, Cosimo
    Giovanella, Luca
    Trimboli, Pierpaolo
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 128 (04) : 250 - 259
  • [48] Incidental Thyroid Nodules on Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Examining Prevalence, Follow-Up, and Risk of Malignancy
    Song, Zhixing
    Wu, Christopher
    Kasmirski, Julia
    Gillis, Andrea
    Fazendin, Jessica
    Lindeman, Brenessa
    Chen, Herbert
    THYROID, 2024, 34 (11) : 1389 - 1400
  • [49] Combining the American Thyroid Association's Ultrasound Classification with Cytological Subcategorization Improves the Assessment of Malignancy Risk in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules
    Larcher de Almeida, Aline Machado
    Delfim, Ricardo Luiz Costantin
    Vidal, Ana Paula Aguiar
    Chaves, Maria Clara d'Araujo Couto Martins
    Santiago, Ana Carolina Lopes
    Gianotti, Marcos Feijo
    Goncalves, Manuel Domingos da Cruz
    Vaisman, Mario
    de Carvalho, Denise Pires
    Teixeira, Patricia de Fatima dos Santos
    THYROID, 2021, 31 (06) : 922 - 932
  • [50] Evaluating the 2015 American Thyroid Association Risk Stratification System in High-Risk Papillary and Follicular Thyroid Cancer Patients
    van Velsen, Evert F. S.
    Stegenga, Merel T.
    van Kemenade, Folkert J.
    Kam, Boen L. R.
    van Ginhoven, Tessa M.
    Visser, W. Edward
    Peeters, Robin P.
    THYROID, 2019, 29 (08) : 1073 - 1079