Malignancy Risk of Thyroid Nodules That Are Not Classifiable by the American Thyroid Association Ultrasound Risk Stratification System: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Kwon, Daniel [1 ]
Kulich, Marta [1 ]
Mack, Wendy J. [2 ]
Monedero, Rodrigo Martinez [1 ]
Joyo, Eri [3 ]
Angell, Trevor E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Keck Med, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Populat & Publ Hlth Sci, Keck Med, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Div Endocrinol & Diabet, Keck Med, 2020 Zonal Ave,IRD620, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
thyroid neoplasms; papillary thyroid cancer; ultrasound; thyroid nodule; risk stratification; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; TI-RADS; GUIDELINES; TIRADS;
D O I
10.1089/thy.2022.0672
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Sonographic evaluation is fundamental to thyroid nodule assessment. The American Thyroid Association (ATA) ultrasound risk stratification system (USRSS) is widely used, but the appearance of some nodules has been considered nonclassifiable (NC-ATA). The risk of malignancy (RoM) of NC-ATA nodules varies widely between studies, leading to uncertainty in clinical management. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the prevalence and malignancy risk of NC-ATA nodules.Methods: A systematic review was performed searching PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE to identify original studies of thyroid nodules classified using the ATA USRSS from 2016 to 2022 and reporting the outcome of NC-ATA nodules. Meta-analysis was conducted to obtain pooled RoM estimates and meta-regression sensitivity analyses were used to explore sources of between-study heterogeneity.Results: Of 6377 screened studies, 135 underwent full-text review, and 16 studies reporting 21,271 nodules were included. Within these, the pooled prevalence of NC-ATA nodules was 7.8% (1872 nodules; [confidence interval; CI 5.1-11.1]). The pooled RoM estimate for NC-ATA nodules was 20.3% [CI 13.0-28.7] and there was significant heterogeneity between studies (I-2 = 92.8%, p < 0.001). NC-ATA nodule RoM estimates were significantly different by study type: single-center versus multicenter studies (24.8% vs. 12.3%, respectively, p = 0.031) and study design: retrospective versus prospective studies (25.1% vs. 8.5%, respectively, p = 0.003). No significant difference was observed in RoM based on inclusion of Conclusion: In this first meta-analysis comprehensively assessing the RoM of NC-ATA nodules, the malignancy risk was found to be comparable with the current ATA USRSS intermediate suspicion category. Significant heterogeneity was observed between studies and limits the interpretation of these results. In future iterations of the ATA USRSS that seek into incorporate categorization of NC-ATA nodules, these meta-analysis data may help to inform proper malignancy risk stratification. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42020182498), on July 14, 2020.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 602
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Macrocalcifications Do Not Alter Malignancy Risk Within the American Thyroid Association Sonographic Pattern System When Present in Non-High Suspicion Thyroid Nodules
    Kobaly, Kristen
    Kim, Caroline S.
    Langer, Jill E.
    Mandel, Susan J.
    THYROID, 2021, 31 (10) : 1542 - 1548
  • [22] Ultrasound imaging classifications of thyroid nodules for malignancy risk stratification and clinical management: state of the art
    Floridi, Chiara
    Cellina, Michaela
    Buccimazza, Giorgio
    Arrichiello, Antonio
    Sacrini, Andrea
    Arrigoni, Francesco
    Pompili, Giovanni
    Barile, Antonio
    Carrafiello, Gianpaolo
    GLAND SURGERY, 2019, 8 : S233 - S244
  • [23] Comparison of ultrasound risk stratification systems for pediatric thyroid nodules
    Yu, Jing
    Cui, Yiyang
    Fu, Chao
    Ma, Xiao
    Si, Caifeng
    Huang, Yuanjing
    Cui, Kefei
    Zhang, Yan
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [24] Malignancy risk stratification and subcategorization of K-TIRADS intermediate suspicion thyroid nodules: a retrospective multicenter study
    Lee, Boeun
    Na, Dong Gyu
    Kim, Ji-hoon
    ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2024, 43 (02) : 132 - 140
  • [25] Thyroid nodules: need for a universal risk stratification system
    Majety, Priyanka
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [26] Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification for Malignancy in Thyroid Nodules: A Four-Tier Categorization System
    Seo, Hyobin
    Na, Dong Gyu
    Kim, Ji-Hoon
    Kim, Kyung Won
    Yoon, Ji Won
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (07) : 2153 - 2162
  • [27] Diagnostic Performance of Four Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kim, Pyeong Hwa
    Suh, Chong Hyun
    Baek, Jung Hwan
    Chung, Sae Rom
    Choi, Young Jun
    Lee, Jeong Hyun
    THYROID, 2020, 30 (08) : 1159 - 1168
  • [28] Unnecessary thyroid nodule biopsy rates under four ultrasound risk stratification systems: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Pyeong Hwa
    Suh, Chong Hyun
    Baek, Jung Hwan
    Chung, Sae Rom
    Choi, Young Jun
    Lee, Jeong Hyun
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (05) : 2877 - 2885
  • [29] Ultrasound malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules based on the degree of hypoechogenicity and echotexture
    Ji Ye Lee
    Dong Gyu Na
    So Jin Yoon
    Hye Yun Gwon
    Wooyul Paik
    Taeeun Kim
    Jin Yub Kim
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 1653 - 1663
  • [30] Risk stratification of indeterminate thyroid nodules using ultrasound and machine learning algorithms
    Gild, Matti Lauren
    Chan, Mico
    Gajera, Jay
    Lurie, Brett
    Gandomkar, Ziba
    Clifton-Bligh, Roderick J.
    CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2022, 96 (04) : 646 - 652