Evaluation of modern educational software and basic digital competences among teachers in Italy

被引：3
作者：
Tomczyk, Lukasz [1 ,4 ]
Limone, Pierpaolo [2 ]
Guarini, Piergiorgio [3 ]
机构：
[1] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Educ, Krakow, Poland
[2] Rector Foggia Univ, Dev & Educ Psychol, Foggia, Italy
[3] Foggia Univ, Dept Humanities, Neurosci & Educ, Foggia, Italy
[4] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Educ, 12 Stefana Batorego St, Krakow, Poland
来源：
INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING INTERNATIONAL | 2024年 / 61卷 / 02期
关键词：
Teaching software; teachers; Italy; digitalisation; schooling; digital literacy; PERCEPTIONS; TECHNOLOGY; COUNTRIES; ICT;
D O I：
10.1080/14703297.2023.2173632
中图分类号：
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号：
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要：
The aim of this paper is to evaluate the usefulness of educational software among teachers in Italy (N = 559). The evaluation of usefulness was conducted on the latest and most popular web-based software used by European teachers, namely: Quizizz, Mentimeter, Wakelet, Padlet, Canva, Emaze, Answergarden, Jamboard, Coggle, Createley, Wordwall, LearningApps, Prezi, Kahoot, Plickers, Trimino, Dobble, Genial.ly, ClassDojo, Explain Everything, KhanAcademy, and Easelly. Based on data collected in the first half of 2022 using an online survey, it was noted that: 1) The majority of teachers are not able to evaluate modern software because they do not use such teaching resources as those listed; 2) About 9.3% of teachers rate the listed software highly; 3) Most commonly teachers use and also rate highly: Canva, Wordwall, Padlet, LearningApps, Kahoot, Coggle, Jamboard, and Prezi; 4) Seniority and workplace does not always differentiate the evaluation of educational software.
引用
收藏
页码：355 / 369
页数：15
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Agostini D., 2022, ICERI 2022 P, P65659
  • [2] Arteaga M., 2020, ICT and education in the perspective of experts from business, government, academia and NGOs: in Europe, Latin America and Caribbean
  • [3] Badri M., 2013, P 2013 INT C INF BUS, DOI [https://doi.org/10.2991/icibet.2013.124, DOI 10.2991/ICIBET.2013.124]
  • [4] Baroni Federica, 2022, Stud Health Technol Inform, V297, P541, DOI 10.3233/SHTI220885
  • [5] A systematic review of online examinations: A pedagogical innovation for scalable authentication and integrity
    Butler-Henderson, Kerryn
    Crawford, Joseph
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2020, 159
  • [6] Colajanni Gabriella, 2023, INFORMS Transactions on Education, P104, DOI 10.1287/ited.2022.0271
  • [7] Teachers' perspective on school development at German vocational schools during the Covid-19 pandemic
    Delcker, Jan
    Ifenthaler, Dirk
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY PEDAGOGY AND EDUCATION, 2021, 30 (01) : 125 - 139
  • [8] Eger L, 2018, J BALT SCI EDUC, V17, P851
  • [9] Fedeli Laura, 2022, Digital Literacy for Teachers. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology, P261, DOI 10.1007/978-981-19-1738-7_14
  • [10] Fedeli L., 2017, ED SCI SOC, V8
1234