Interpretation of Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System Version 2.1: A Primer

被引:3
|
作者
Spilseth, Benjamin [1 ]
Margolis, Daniel J. A. [2 ]
Gupta, Rajan T. [3 ,4 ]
Chang, Silvia D. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, MMC 292,420 Delaware St, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Radiol, 525 East 68th St,Box 141, New York, NY 10021 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Duke Canc Inst,Ctr Prostate & Urol Canc, DUMC Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Duke Canc Inst,Ctr Prostate & Urol Canc, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, DUMC Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[5] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, 899 West 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
关键词
Prostate MRI; PI-RADS; Prostate cancer; Cancer detection; Staging; PI-RADS V2; PERIPHERAL ZONE; CANCER; MRI; BIOPSY; RADIOLOGISTS; HEMORRHAGE; PITFALLS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rcl.2023.06.007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
All radiologists interpreting prostate MRI should have a firm knowledge of the principles of PI-RADS 2.1 and its use in practice. This article pro-vides that basic framework and can serve as the foundation for prostate MRI interpretation in mod-ern clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 36
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] PI-RADS 2.1 and structured reporting of magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate
    Hoetker, Andreas
    Donati, Olivio F.
    RADIOLOGE, 2021, 61 (09): : 802 - 809
  • [22] Review of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2
    Wahab, Shaun A.
    Verma, Sadhna
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2016, 12 (21) : 2479 - 2494
  • [23] Apparent diffusion coefficients in magnetic resonance imaging and prostate imaging reporting and data system score in the canine prostate gland
    Jasinski, T.
    Skierbiszewska, K.
    Domino, M.
    Pawlinski, B.
    Wehrend, A.
    Siewruk, K.
    Ciszkowska, B.
    Gajewska, M.
    Dubiejko, A.
    Gajewski, Z.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2018, 53 : 19 - 19
  • [24] The Utility of Combined Target and Systematic Prostate Biopsies in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Based on Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Kato, Daiki
    Ozawa, Kaori
    Takeuchi, Shinichi
    Kawase, Makoto
    Kawase, Kota
    Nakai, Chie
    Takai, Manabu
    Iinuma, Koji
    Nakane, Keita
    Kato, Hiroki
    Matsuo, Masayuki
    Suzui, Natsuko
    Miyazaki, Tatsuhiko
    Koie, Takuya
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (02) : 1294 - 1301
  • [25] Performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Park, Kye Jin
    Choi, Sang Hyun
    Kim, Mi-Hyun
    Kim, Jeong Kon
    Jeong, In Gab
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2021, 54 (01) : 103 - 112
  • [26] Significance of atypical nodules upgraded to category 3 in Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.1 for prostate cancer diagnosis
    Asai, Shintaro
    Kobayashi, Masaki
    Fukuda, Shohei
    Kimura, Koichiro
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 31 (06) : 693 - 695
  • [27] The Impact of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 and Prostate-Specific Antigen Density in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
    Tezcan, Sehnaz
    Ozturk, Funda Ulu
    Bekar, Ulku
    Ozturk, Erdem
    UROLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2023, 49 (02) : 120 - 124
  • [28] Validation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Hofbauer, Sebastian L.
    Maxeiner, Andreas
    Kittner, Beatrice
    Heckmann, Robin
    Reimann, Maximillian
    Wiemer, Laura
    Asbach, Patrick
    Haas, Matthias
    Penzkofer, Tobias
    Stephan, Carsten
    Friedersdorff, Frank
    Fuller, Florian
    Miller, Kurt
    Cash, Hannes
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (04): : 767 - 772
  • [29] Prostate cancer detection rates of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy related to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score
    Daniël F. Osses
    Joost J. van Asten
    Gerard J. Kieft
    Jasper D. Tijsterman
    World Journal of Urology, 2017, 35 : 207 - 212
  • [30] Prostate cancer detection rates of magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy related to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System score
    Osses, Daniel F.
    van Asten, Joost J.
    Kieft, Gerard J.
    Tijsterman, Jasper D.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (02) : 207 - 212