Addition of gentamicin for antibiotic prophylaxis in hip hemiarthroplasty does not decrease the rate of surgical site infection

被引:1
|
作者
Amzallag, Nissan [1 ]
Ashkenazi, Itay [1 ]
Factor, Shai [1 ]
Abadi, Mohamed [1 ]
Morgan, Samuel [2 ]
Graif, Nadav [1 ]
Snir, Nimrod [1 ]
Gold, Aviram [1 ]
Warschawski, Yaniv [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Div Orthoped, 6 Weizman St, IL-6423906 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Hip hemiarthroplasty; Periprosthetic joint infection; Gentamicin; Surgical site infection; PROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTIONS; ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS; ORTHOPEDIC-SURGERY; RISK-FACTORS; ARTHROPLASTY; GUIDELINES; ETIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s00068-023-02406-6
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe addition of Gram-negative coverage to antibiotic prophylaxis protocols prior to elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been reported to reduce periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, it is unknown whether adding a Gram-negative-targeted antibiotic agent improves outcomes in the trauma population. This study aimed to investigate whether the addition of a single, pre-operative dose of Gentamicin is associated with lower rates of PJI in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty (HA) as treatment for a hip fracture.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed cases of patients who underwent HA as treatment for a hip fracture from January 2011 to January 2022, and had a minimum 1-year of follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on the antibiotic prophylaxis they received during surgery: cefazolin (control group) or cefazolin with addition of Gentamicin (case group). The primary outcome was the rate of surgical site infections (SSI), and secondary outcomes included rates of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and superficial SSIs.ResultsThe final study population consisted of 1521 patients. 336 patients (22.1%) were in the case group and 1185 (77.9%) patients were in the control group. Rates of SSI were comparable between the groups (3.8% for the case group vs. 2.8% in the control group, p = 0.34). This held true for both PJIs (3.5 vs. 2.5%, p = 0.3) and superficial SSIs (0.29 vs. 0.33%, p = 0.91). The distribution of the causing pathogen was similar between the groups (p = 0.84). Gentamicin susceptibility rates of the Gram-negative bacteria associated with PJI were similar between the cohorts (p = 0.51).ConclusionsThe addition of a single, pre-operative dose of Gentamicin to the antibiotic prophylaxis protocol of patients undergoing HA as treatment for a hip fracture was not associated with lower rates of SSI, PJI or superficial SSI. The findings of this study indicate that the prophylactic benefits of Gentamicin may not apply to HA as they do to THA.
引用
收藏
页码:867 / 873
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and the prevalence and risk factors associated with surgical site infection in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia
    Zammari, Nur Farahiah
    Abubakar, Usman
    Che Alhadi, Shahidah
    Khan, Faiz Ullah
    DRUGS & THERAPY PERSPECTIVES, 2022, 38 (05) : 235 - 242
  • [32] Prolongation of antibiotic prophylaxis after clean and clean-contaminated surgery and surgical site infection
    De Chiara, S.
    Chiumello, D.
    Nicolini, R.
    Vigorelli, M.
    Cesana, B.
    Bottino, N.
    Giurati, G.
    Caspani, M. L.
    Gattinoni, L.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2010, 76 (06) : 413 - 419
  • [33] Efficacy of Short course perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis: surgical site infection in elective orthopedic surgery
    Albaker, Abdul Malik Baker
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (01): : 603 - 606
  • [34] Local application of gentamicin-containing collagen implant in the prophylaxis and treatment of surgical site infection in orthopaedic surgery
    Knaepler, Harald
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 10 : S15 - S20
  • [35] Is Antibiotic Prophylaxis Reasonable in Parotid Surgery? Retrospective Analysis of Surgical Site Infection
    Wei, Dong
    Zheng, Yuping
    Bi, Ling
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2024, 25 (07) : 521 - 526
  • [36] Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Preventing Surgical Site Infections in Foot and Ankle Surgery
    Tantigate, Direk
    Jang, Eugene
    Seetharaman, Mani
    Noback, Peter C.
    Heijne, A. M.
    Greisberg, Justin K.
    Vosseller, J. Turner
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 38 (03) : 283 - 288
  • [37] Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Children: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Khoshbin, Amir
    So, Jeannette P.
    Aleem, Ilyas S.
    Stephens, Derek
    Matlow, Anne G.
    Wright, James G.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2015, 262 (02) : 397 - 402
  • [38] Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical site infections as a risk factor for infection with Clostridium difficile
    Balch, Aubrey
    Wendelboe, Aaron M.
    Vesely, Sara K.
    Bratzler, Dale W.
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (06):
  • [39] DOES TOPICAL USE OF GENTAMICIN REDUCE THE INFECTION RATE IN PRIMARY TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY?
    de Toledo Qliveira, Caio Luiz
    Elias, Felipe Abrahao
    Ribacionka, Andre dos Santos
    Ferraz Picado, Cel So Herminio
    Garcia, Flavio Luis
    ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2019, 27 (04): : 197 - 201
  • [40] Is Cutibacterium acnes early surgical site infection rate related to the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery?
    Marion Caseris
    Brice Ilharreborde
    Catherine Doit
    Anne-Laure Simon
    Christine Vitoux
    Nora Poey
    Stéphane Bonacorsi
    Cindy Mallet
    European Spine Journal, 2020, 29 : 1499 - 1504