Formation of Fe-Ti oxide and Ni-Co sulfide ores by concentric tube flow and hydrous metal-rich melt recharge into the cooling crystal mush: Example from the Hongge intrusion in Panxi region, SW China

被引:5
|
作者
Chen, Xiao-Dong [1 ,2 ]
Li, You-Guo [1 ]
Luo, Zhao-Hua [3 ,4 ]
Fei, Guang-Chun [1 ]
Luo, Wei [1 ]
Zhang, Teng-Jiao [5 ]
Peng, Xing-Cai [1 ]
Zou, Yu-Song [6 ]
机构
[1] Chengdu Univ Technol, Coll Earth Sci, Chengdu 610059, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Earth & Space Sci, Shenzhen 518055, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Geosci, Sch Earth Sci & Resources, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[4] China Univ Geosci, State Key Lab Geol Proc & Mineral Resources, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[5] China Geol Survey, Chengdu Ctr, Chengdu 610081, Peoples R China
[6] 106 Geol Brigade Sichuan Bur Geol & Mineral Resour, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
(Ultra-)mafic intrusions; Fe-Ti oxides; Ni-Co sulfides; Concentric tube flow; Crystal mush; LARGE IGNEOUS PROVINCE; LA-ICP-MS; PLATINUM-GROUP ELEMENTS; LAYERED INTRUSION; LIQUID IMMISCIBILITY; TRACE-ELEMENTS; MAGMA CHAMBER; MAFIC INTRUSION; CAMPI-FLEGREI; MANTLE SOURCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.oregeorev.2023.105594
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The Panxi (ultra-)mafic intrusions are relatively small compared with world-class ore-related (ultra-)mafic in-trusions, but they host several super-large Fe-Ti oxide deposits and few small Cu-Ni (PGE) sulfide deposits. The mechanisms that concentrate huge amounts of oxide minerals into these small intrusions and form the distinct oxide and sulfide mineralization remain poorly understood. Here, we investigate the magma dynamics that produced extensive Fe-Ti oxide and coexisting Ni-Co sulfide mineralization in the Hongge intrusion of Panxi region, based on detailed field cross-cutting relations and petrographic observations, bulk-ore/rock geochem-istry, and in-situ LA-ICP-MS magnetite trace element analyses. The Fe-Ti oxide ores include magnetite-poor (<60 vol%) disseminated and magnetite-rich (>60 vol%) massive types, with the former further divided into the gabbro-hosted (GH) and (olivine-)pyroxenite-hosted (OPH) subtypes. The GH oxide ores have Cr-poor (median 86.9 ppm) magnetite and abundant apatite interstitial to silicate minerals. In contrast, the OPH and massive oxide ores have Cr-rich (median 13,956 ppm) magnetite that envelops resorbed silicate minerals. Principal component analyses of bulk-ore and magnetite elemental contents reveal genetic links between the OPH and massive oxide ores, but remarkable genetic distinction from the GH oxide ores. Considering the overall lopolith-shape orebody geometry of several branch intrusions, the GH oxide ore formation may have involved sponta-neous development of concentric tube flow zones within the cooling crystal mush. However, the lower P but much higher Cr-Cu-Co-Ni contents than the GH oxide ores and the sharp intrusion of massive oxide ores into the OPH oxide ores suggests that the OPH and massive oxide ores were probably formed by upward percolation and later intrusion of hydrous Fe-rich melts from a deep-seated magma reservoir into semi-solidified and fossilized mush, respectively. In addition, sulfide ores occur mainly as irregular/lenticular aggregates in massive oxide ores and are depleted in Cu and platinum group elements (PGEs), indicating early, deep-level sulfide segregation that scavenged the Cu and PGEs from the magmas. Hence, we envisage that the assimilation of S-deficient wall-rocks into basaltic magmas may have induced the early sulfide saturation and retain the majority of Fe for later precipitation as principal oxide and minor PGE-Cu-depleted sulfide ores.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据