The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:7
|
作者
Liu, Wentao [2 ]
Gong, Jian [1 ]
Gu, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Gastroenterol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Urol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Colorectal polyp; Polypectomy; Incomplete resection rate; Cold snare polypectomy; Hot snare polypectomy; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04429-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeThe optimal technique for removing small colorectal polyps ranging from 5 to 10 mm in size remains uncertain. In order to compare the efficacy and adverse events between cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for removing small polyps, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases from 1998 to May 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for resecting small colorectal polyps. The primary outcome measure was the incomplete resection rate (IRR).ResultsSeven studies that met our study criteria, with a total of 3178 included polyps, were included in our analysis. The incomplete resection rate (IRR) was found to be significantly higher in the CSP group compared to the HSP group (risk ratio [RR] 1.57 [1.17-2.11], P = 0.003). Although the CSP group had a higher local recurrence rate than the HSP group, the difference was not statistically significant (RR: 3.98 [0.66-23.84], P = 0.13). The polyp retrieval rates were not significantly different between the two groups (RR: 1.00 [0.99-1], P = 0.22). Perforation was not reported or mentioned in any of the seven studies. The overall immediate bleeding rate was significantly higher in the CSP group than the HSP group (RR: 2.26 [1.63-3.14], P < 0.001), but immediate postpolypectomy bleeding requiring additional intervention was similar between the groups (RR: 1.08 [0.54-2.17], P = 0.82). The delayed bleeding rate (RR: 0.83 [0.45-1.55], P = 0.56) and specific polypectomy time (RR: -0.46 [-1.05-0.12], P = 0.12) were also similar between the groups.ConclusionsThe meta-analysis shows a significantly higher IRR for CSP compared with HSP when removing small polyps.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cold snare polypectomy versus cold endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial
    Min Ji Kim
    Soo Young Na
    Joon Sung Kim
    Hyun Ho Choi
    Dae Bum Kim
    Jeong-Seon Ji
    Byung-Wook Kim
    Hwang Choi
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 3789 - 3795
  • [22] Efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy for sessile serrated polyps ≥ 10 mm: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, De-feng
    Van Overbeke, Lode
    Ohata, Ken
    Wang, Li-sheng
    Yao, Jun
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2022, 54 (11) : 1486 - 1493
  • [23] Comparison of cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection and hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection for small colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial
    Oh, Chang Kyo
    Cho, Young Wook
    Jung, Jiyoon
    Lee, Hee Yeon
    Kim, Jin Bae
    Cho, Young-Seok
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [24] The efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy with submucosal injection for the removal of polyps less than 20 mm in size: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang, Zheng
    Wei, Yongqiu
    Zhang, Shutian
    Li, Peng
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 38 (11) : 1892 - 1899
  • [25] Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cold Snare Polypectomy and Conventional Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps
    Ichise, Yasuyuki
    Horiuchi, Akira
    Nakayama, Yoshiko
    Tanaka, Naoki
    DIGESTION, 2011, 84 (01) : 78 - 81
  • [26] Histological outcomes between hot and cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps
    Yamamoto, Toshiki
    Suzuki, Sho
    Kusano, Chika
    Yakabe, Kyoko
    Iwamoto, Maho
    Ikehara, Hisatomo
    Gotoda, Takuji
    Moriyama, Mitsuhiko
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 23 (04) : 246 - 252
  • [27] Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy
    Nakamatsu, Dai
    Nishida, Tsutomu
    Fujii, Yoshifumi
    Yamaoka, Sho
    Osugi, Naoto
    Sugimoto, Aya
    Mukai, Kaori
    Matsumoto, Kengo
    Yamamoto, Masashi
    Hayashi, Shiro
    Nakajima, Sachiko
    TECHNIQUES AND INNOVATIONS IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 24 (03): : 246 - 253
  • [28] Cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection for colon polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abdallah, Mohamed
    Ahmed, Khalid
    Abbas, Daniyal
    Mohamed, Mouhand F. H.
    Suryawanshi, Gaurav
    Mcdonald, Nicholas
    Wilson, Natalie
    Umar, Shifa
    Shaukat, Aasma
    Bilal, Mohammad
    ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 55 (12) : 1083 - 1094
  • [29] Bleeding Risk of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps Measuring 10 mm or Less: Subgroup Analysis of a Large Randomized Controlled Trial
    Tseng, Cheng-Hao
    Chang, Li-Chun
    Wu, Jia-Ling
    Chang, Chi-Yang
    Chen, Chi-Yi
    Chen, Peng-Jen
    Shun, Chia-Tung
    Hsu, Wen-Feng
    Chen, Yen-Nien
    Chen, Chieh-Chang
    Huang, Tien-Yu
    Tu, Chia-Hung
    Chen, Mei-Jyh
    Chou, Chu-Kuang
    Lee, Ching-Tai
    Chen, Po-Yueh
    Lin, Jaw-Town
    Wu, Ming-Shiang
    Chiu, Han-Mo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (11) : 2233 - 2240
  • [30] Underwater versus conventional cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps 4-9 mm in diameter: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Myung, Yu Sik
    Kwon, Hyuki
    Han, Jaeho
    Lim, Jongreul
    Choi, Soo Yong
    Baeg, Myong Ki
    Han, Sok Won
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (09): : 6527 - 6534