The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:9
作者
Liu, Wentao [2 ]
Gong, Jian [1 ]
Gu, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Gastroenterol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Cent South Univ, Xiangya Hosp 2, Dept Urol, Changsha 410011, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Colorectal polyp; Polypectomy; Incomplete resection rate; Cold snare polypectomy; Hot snare polypectomy; RESECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04429-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeThe optimal technique for removing small colorectal polyps ranging from 5 to 10 mm in size remains uncertain. In order to compare the efficacy and adverse events between cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for removing small polyps, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials.MethodsWe conducted a comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases from 1998 to May 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for resecting small colorectal polyps. The primary outcome measure was the incomplete resection rate (IRR).ResultsSeven studies that met our study criteria, with a total of 3178 included polyps, were included in our analysis. The incomplete resection rate (IRR) was found to be significantly higher in the CSP group compared to the HSP group (risk ratio [RR] 1.57 [1.17-2.11], P = 0.003). Although the CSP group had a higher local recurrence rate than the HSP group, the difference was not statistically significant (RR: 3.98 [0.66-23.84], P = 0.13). The polyp retrieval rates were not significantly different between the two groups (RR: 1.00 [0.99-1], P = 0.22). Perforation was not reported or mentioned in any of the seven studies. The overall immediate bleeding rate was significantly higher in the CSP group than the HSP group (RR: 2.26 [1.63-3.14], P < 0.001), but immediate postpolypectomy bleeding requiring additional intervention was similar between the groups (RR: 1.08 [0.54-2.17], P = 0.82). The delayed bleeding rate (RR: 0.83 [0.45-1.55], P = 0.56) and specific polypectomy time (RR: -0.46 [-1.05-0.12], P = 0.12) were also similar between the groups.ConclusionsThe meta-analysis shows a significantly higher IRR for CSP compared with HSP when removing small polyps.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Extended cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps increases the R0 resection rate [J].
Abe, Yasuhiro ;
Nabeta, Haruaki ;
Koyanagi, Ryota ;
Nakamichi, Taro ;
Hirashima, Hayato ;
Lefor, Alan Kawarai ;
Shinozaki, Satoshi .
ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2018, 6 (02) :E254-E258
[2]   Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for small (5-9 mm) colorectal polyps: a multicenter randomized controlled trial [J].
de Benito Sanz, Marina ;
Hernandez, Luis ;
Garcia Martinez, Maria Isabel ;
Diez-Redondo, Pilar ;
Joao Matias, Diana ;
Gonzalez-Santiago, Jesus M. ;
Ibanez, Mercedes ;
Nunez Rodriguez, Maria Henar ;
Cimavilla, Marta ;
Tafur, Carla ;
Mata, Laura ;
Guardiola-Arevalo, Antonio ;
Feito, Jorge ;
Javier Garcia-Alonso, Francisco .
ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 54 (01) :35-44
[3]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[4]   A GENETIC MODEL FOR COLORECTAL TUMORIGENESIS [J].
FEARON, ER ;
VOGELSTEIN, B .
CELL, 1990, 61 (05) :759-767
[5]   Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study (with videos) [J].
Gomez, Victoria ;
Badillo, Raul J. ;
Crook, Julia E. ;
Krishna, Murli ;
Diehl, Nancy N. ;
Wallace, Michael B. .
ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2015, 3 (01) :E76-E80
[6]   Cold snare polypectomy: optimizing technique and technology (with videos) [J].
Hewett, David G. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 82 (04) :693-696
[7]   Prospective, randomized comparison of 2 methods of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps [J].
Horiuchi, Akira ;
Hosoi, Kenji ;
Kajiyama, Masashi ;
Tanaka, Naoki ;
Sano, Kenji ;
Graham, David Y. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 82 (04) :686-692
[8]   Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy [J].
Horiuchi, Akira ;
Nakayama, Yoshiko ;
Kajiyama, Masashi ;
Tanaka, Naoki ;
Sano, Kenji ;
Graham, David Y. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 79 (03) :417-423
[9]   Resection depth and layer of cold snare polypectomy versus endoscopic mucosal resection [J].
Ito, Akihiro ;
Suga, Tomoaki ;
Ota, Hiroyoshi ;
Tateiwa, Nobuyuki ;
Matsumoto, Akihiro ;
Tanaka, Eiji .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 53 (11) :1171-1178
[10]   Safety and efficacy of cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps A prospective randomized control trial and one-year follow-up study [J].
Ito, Takahiro ;
Takahashi, Keitaro ;
Tanabe, Hiroki ;
Sato, Keisuke ;
Goto, Mitsuru ;
Sato, Tomonobu ;
Tanaka, Kazuyuki ;
Utsumi, Tatsuya ;
Fujinaga, Akihiro ;
Kawamoto, Toru ;
Yanagawa, Nobuyuki ;
Moriichi, Kentaro ;
Fujiya, Mikihiro ;
Okumura, Toshikatsu .
MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (23) :E26296