Machine-Learning Approach to Non-Destructive Biomass and Relative Growth Rate Estimation in Aeroponic Cultivation

被引:2
作者
Astrom, Oskar [1 ]
Hedlund, Henrik [2 ]
Sopasakis, Alexandros [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Math, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Alovivum AB, Goingegatan 6, S-22241 Lund, Sweden
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 04期
基金
瑞典研究理事会; 芬兰科学院;
关键词
machine learning; aeroponics; hydroculture; neural network; regression; biomass; fresh weight; relative growth rate; image analysis; CROP; AREA;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture13040801
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
We train and compare the performance of two machine learning methods, a multi-variate regression network and a ResNet-50-based neural network, to learn and forecast plant biomass as well as the relative growth rate from a short sequence of temporal images from plants in aeroponic cultivation. The training dataset consists of images of 57 plants taken from two different angles every hour during a 5-day period. The results show that images taken from a top-down perspective produce better results for the multi-variate regression network, while images taken from the side are better for the ResNet-50 neural network. In addition, using images from both cameras improves the biomass estimates from the ResNet-50 network, but not those from the multi-variatemultivariate regression. However, all relative growth rate estimates were improved by using images from both cameras. We found that the best biomass estimates are produced from the multi-variate regression model trained on top camera images using a moving average filter resulting in a root mean square error of 0.0466 g. The best relative growth rate estimates were produced from the ResNet-50 network training on images from both cameras resulting in a root mean square error of 0.1767 g/(g center dot day).
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Beck MA, 2021, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2108.05789, 10.48550/arXiv.2108.05789, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.2108.05789]
  • [2] Combined analysis of satellite and ground data for winter wheat yield forecasting
    Broms, Camilla
    Nilsson, Mikael
    Oxenstierna, Andreas
    Sopasakis, Alexandros
    Astrom, Karl
    [J]. SMART AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 3
  • [3] Burnham K. P., 2002, MODEL SELECTION MULT, DOI DOI 10.1007/B97636
  • [4] Non-destructive Plant Biomass Monitoring With High Spatio-Temporal Resolution via Proximal RGB-D Imagery and End-to-End Deep Learning
    Buxbaum, Nicolas
    Lieth, Johann Heinrich
    Earles, Mason
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 13
  • [5] Carter W, 1942, PHYTOPATHOLOGY, V32, P623
  • [6] Deng J, 2009, PROC CVPR IEEE, P248, DOI 10.1109/CVPRW.2009.5206848
  • [7] Estimation of spectral responses and chlorophyll based on growth stage effects explored by machine learning methods
    Gao, Dehua
    Qiao, Lang
    An, Lulu
    Zhao, Ruomei
    Sun, Hong
    Li, Minzan
    Tang, Weijie
    Wang, Nan
    [J]. CROP JOURNAL, 2022, 10 (05): : 1292 - 1302
  • [8] Ghorbel R., 2021, P 5 INT STUD SCI CON, DOI [10.52460/issc.2021.007, DOI 10.52460/ISSC.2021.007]
  • [9] Automated crop and weed monitoring in widely spaced cereals
    Hague, T.
    Tillett, N. D.
    Wheeler, H.
    [J]. PRECISION AGRICULTURE, 2006, 7 (01) : 21 - 32
  • [10] Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
    He, Kaiming
    Zhang, Xiangyu
    Ren, Shaoqing
    Sun, Jian
    [J]. 2016 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2016, : 770 - 778