Uncertainty indices and stock market volatility predictability during the global pandemic: evidence from G7 countries

被引:1
作者
Fameliti, Stavroula P. [1 ]
Skintzi, Vasiliki D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Peloponnese, Sch Econ & Technol, Dept Econ, Tripolis Campus, Thesi Sehi 22100, Tripoli, Greece
关键词
Volatility forecasting; combination forecasts; statistical and economic evaluation; uncertainty indices; COVID-19; COMBINATION FORECASTS; POLITICAL UNCERTAINTY; REALIZED KERNELS; OUTPUT GROWTH; ANYTHING BEAT; MODEL; POLICY; SHRINKAGE; SELECTION; RETURNS;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2023.2186366
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article attempts to examine the predictability of a significant number of uncertainty indices for the G7 stock market volatility based on a Heterogeneous AutoRegressive Realized Volatility (HARRV) model and a combination forecast framework during the global pandemic COVID-19. We include in our analysis the Infectious Disease Equity Market Volatility (IDEMV), the VIX, the Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU), the Equity Market Volatility (EMV), the Geopolitical risk (GPR) as well as the crude oil futures' realized volatility. Out-of-sample evidence shows that models incorporating all uncertainty indices improve forecasting performance for most stock markets' volatility during a long out-of-sample period and also during the coronavirus period. The results are robust using an alternative volatility model, an alternative realized measure and a recursive window analysis. The predictability of the uncertainty indices is also evaluated through risk management and portfolio loss functions and results suggest that the LASSO combination and a HARRV model including all indices are the most profitable for all stock markets during the global pandemic.
引用
收藏
页码:2315 / 2336
页数:22
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Ait-Sahalia Y., 2021, NATL BUREAU EC RES W
  • [2] Alan Nazli Sila., 2020, Multi-regime forecasting model for the impact of covid-19 pandemic on volatility in global equity markets
  • [3] COVID-19 and the United States financial markets' volatility
    Albulescu, Claudiu Tiberiu
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 38
  • [4] Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts
    Andersen, TG
    Bollerslev, T
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) : 885 - 905
  • [5] Roughing it up: Including jump components in the measurement, modeling, and forecasting of return volatility
    Andersen, Torben G.
    Bollerslev, Tim
    Diebold, Francis X.
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2007, 89 (04) : 701 - 720
  • [6] HETEROSKEDASTICITY AND AUTOCORRELATION CONSISTENT COVARIANCE-MATRIX ESTIMATION
    ANDREWS, DWK
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 1991, 59 (03) : 817 - 858
  • [7] Oil and asset classes implied volatilities: Investment strategies and hedging effectiveness
    Antonakakis, Nikolaos
    Cunado, Juncal
    Filis, George
    Gabauer, David
    Perez de Gracia, Fernando
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 91
  • [8] Political uncertainty, COVID-19 pandemic and stock market volatility transmission
    Apostolakis, George N.
    Floros, Christos
    Gkillas, Konstantinos
    Wohar, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2021, 74
  • [9] Infectious disease pandemic and permanent volatility of international stock markets: A long-term perspective
    Bai, Lan
    Wei, Yu
    Wei, Guiwu
    Li, Xiafei
    Zhang, Songyun
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 40
  • [10] Baker S. R., 2020, COVID INDUCED EC UNC, DOI [DOI 10.3386/W26983, 10.3386/w26983]