Land Transfer and Rural Household Consumption Diversity: Promoting or Inhibiting?

被引:10
作者
Li, Gang [1 ]
Cui, Xufeng [2 ]
Pan, Lan [1 ]
Wang, Yufei [3 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Econ, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Business Adm, Wuhan 430073, Peoples R China
[3] Hubei Univ Econ, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Emiss Trading Syst, Wuhan 430205, Peoples R China
关键词
land transfer; rural household; consumption diversity; Simpson index; RENTAL MARKETS; INCOME EVIDENCE; MIGRATION; INEQUALITY; NETWORKS; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT; CHINA;
D O I
10.3390/land12010203
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Land resources are important for millions of rural households in China. With the land tenure system reform and the trend of nonfarm employment, land transfer affects household income and consumption diversity significantly. Utilizing the data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) 2018, this study investigated the effects of land transfer on Chinese rural households' consumption diversity, measured by the Simpson index. In order to mitigate the endogeneity problems caused by reverse causality and selection bias between farmers' household land transfer decisions and consumption behavior, we employed the propensity score matching (PSM) method and instrumental variable (IV) method. Besides, the Shannon index was also used to measure consumption diversity for the robustness test. The results showed that the rural households who have transferred others' land in would decrease their consumption diversity, while the households who have transferred their land out would increase their consumption diversity. Heterogeneity analysis showed that land transfer had different degrees of impact on rural households with different income groups and was more significant for low-income households. Specifically, compared with higher-income households, both the promotion effect of land transfer out and the inhibitory effect of land transfer on consumption diversity were more obvious for lower-income households.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Has Consumption Inequality Mirrored Income Inequality
    Aguiar, Mark
    Bils, Mark
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 105 (09) : 2725 - 2756
  • [2] Consumption inequality and income uncertainty
    Blundell, R
    Preston, I
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1998, 113 (02) : 603 - 640
  • [3] Local government behavior and property right formation in rural China
    Brandt, L
    Rozelle, S
    Turner, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 2004, 160 (04): : 627 - 662
  • [4] Burger K., 1994, FARM HOUSEHOLDS CASH
  • [5] THE RESPONSE OF CONSUMPTION TO INCOME - A CROSS-COUNTRY INVESTIGATION
    CAMPBELL, JY
    MANKIW, NG
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1991, 35 (04) : 723 - 757
  • [6] Local versus global separability in agricultural household models: The factor price equalization effect of land transfer rights
    Carter, MR
    Yao, Y
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 84 (03) : 702 - 715
  • [7] Why Are Saving Rates of Urban Households in China Rising?
    Chamon, Marcos D.
    Prasad, Eswar S.
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-MACROECONOMICS, 2010, 2 (01) : 93 - 130
  • [8] Impact of off-farm labor supply on food expenditures of the farm household
    Chang, Hung-Hao
    Mishra, Ashok
    [J]. FOOD POLICY, 2008, 33 (06) : 657 - 664
  • [9] Property Rights, Land Misallocation, and Agricultural Efficiency in China
    Chari, Amalavoyal
    Liu, Elaine M.
    Wang, Shing-Yi
    Wang, Yongxiang
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2021, 88 (04) : 1831 - 1862
  • [10] Land rental market and rural household efficiency in China
    Chavas, Jean Paul
    Shi, Guanming
    Meng, Xiangyi
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2022, 27 (02) : 103 - 119