Application of deep learning ultrasound imaging in monitoring bone healing after fracture surgery

被引:4
|
作者
Teng, Yugang [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Deyue [2 ]
Zhao, Wenzhi [2 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Med Univ, Dalian 116044, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dalian 116023, Liaoning, Peoples R China
关键词
Deep learning; Ultrasound; Bone healing; Artificial intelligence; Fracture; EARLY-DIAGNOSIS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; REDUCTION; CALLUS; IMAGES; CT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jrras.2022.100493
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: Ultrasound imaging can be used to monitor bone healing after fracture. It has the advantages of simplicity, rapidity, non-radiation, and real-time dynamic observation of fracture healing. It is increasingly valued and developed in clinical applications. Deep learning is an essential branch of artificial intelligence widely used in the medical field.Methods: After fracture surgery, 134 patients were selected for ultrasonic imaging at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks after surgery. Among them, 104 patients were selected for ultrasonic imaging to establish a prediction model for ultrasonic deep learning, and then 30 patients were used for imaging to verify and improve the model. Finally, 30 patients were selected for ultrasonic imaging and X-ray imaging at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks after fracture surgery for the same patient; test the ultrasonic imaging prediction model, compare the ultrasonic imaging and X-ray imaging manual reading, and evaluate the ultrasonic imaging prediction model by accuracy, loss curve, F1 score value, roc curve, AUC value, etc.Results: The accuracy of the ultrasonic imaging deep learning prediction model in the test set was 0.73. In the test set, the predicted AUC values for 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks after fracture surgery were 0.82, 0.90, 0.86, and 0.67, respectively. The accuracy of ultrasonic imaging manual film reading was 0.7, and the AUC values for the four periods were 0.76, 0.81,0.81, and 0.86, respectively. X-ray imaging manual film reading accuracy was 0.7, and the AUC values for the four periods were 0.86, 0.76, 0.81, and 0.84, respectively.Conclusion: Based on the artificial intelligence framework, a deep learning prediction model is constructed by preprocessing the ultrasonic imaging after fracture surgery to predict fracture healing, and its application value is discussed. The prediction model of ultrasonic imaging based on deep learning can be used as an effective monitoring method for bone healing after fracture surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effects of laser vs ultrasound on bone healing after distraction osteogenesis: A histomorphometric analysis
    Barros Medeiros, Myrla Alves
    Andrade Gomes do Nascimento, Leonard Euler
    Leon Lau, Thiago Chon
    Bezerra Barradas Mineiro, Ana Lys
    Pithon, Matheus Melo
    Sant'Anna, Eduardo Franzotti
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2015, 85 (04) : 555 - 561
  • [32] Application of deep learning to establish a diagnostic model of breast lesions using two-dimensional grayscale ultrasound imaging
    Zhang, Nan
    Li, Xiao-Ting
    Ma, Lu
    Fan, Zhao-Qing
    Sun, Ying-Shi
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 79 : 56 - 63
  • [33] Diagnosis and detection of bone fracture in radiographic images using deep learning approaches
    Aldhyani, Theyazn
    Ahmed, Zeyad A. T.
    Alsharbi, Bayan M.
    Ahmad, Sultan
    Al-Adhaileh, Mosleh Hmoud
    Kamal, Ahmed Hassan
    Almaiah, Mohammed
    Nazeer, Jabeen
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2025, 11
  • [34] Automatic detection of cotton balls during brain surgery: Where deep learning meets ultrasound imaging to tackle foreign objects
    Mahapatra, Smruti
    Balamurugan, Manish
    Chung, Kathryn
    Kuppoor, Venkat
    Curry, Eli
    Aghabaglou, Fariba
    Kaovasia, Tarana P.
    Acord, Molly
    Ainechi, Ana
    Kim, Jeff
    Tsehay, Yohannes
    Ghinda, Christina Diana
    Son, Jennifer K.
    Pustavoitau, Aliaksei
    Tyler, Betty
    Robinson, Shenandoah D.
    Theodore, Nicholas
    Brem, Henry
    Huang, Judy
    Manbachi, Amir
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2021: ULTRASONIC IMAGING AND TOMOGRAPHY, 2021, 11602
  • [35] Application of deep learning to identify ductal carcinoma in situ and microinvasion of the breast using ultrasound imaging
    Zhu, Meng
    Pi, Yong
    Jiang, Zekun
    Wu, Yanyan
    Bu, Hong
    Bao, Ji
    Chen, Yujuan
    Zhao, Lijun
    Peng, Yulan
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 12 (09) : 4633 - +
  • [36] Advances in Deep Learning Methods for Prostate Segmentation and Volume Estimation in Ultrasound Imaging
    Kurucz, Liza M.
    Natali, Tiziano
    Fusaglia, Matteo
    Dashtbozorg, Behdad
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (15):
  • [37] Application of Deep Learning in Power Quality Monitoring
    Qiang, Wang
    Hao, Zhang
    Jiang, Hongjun
    Li, Jun-ming
    Ke, Wang
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, 2024, 20 (09) : 1271 - 1275
  • [38] Deep learning for pyrolysis reactor monitoring: From thermal imaging toward smart monitoring system
    Zhu, W.
    Ma, Y.
    Benton, M. G.
    Romagnoli, J. A.
    Zhan, Y.
    AICHE JOURNAL, 2019, 65 (02) : 582 - 591
  • [39] FRACTURE HEALING ENHANCEMENT WITH LOW INTENSITY PULSED ULTRASOUND AT A CRITICAL APPLICATION ANGLE
    Chung, Shu Lu
    Pounder, Neill M.
    de Ana, Francisco J.
    Qin, Ling
    Leung, Kwok Sui
    Cheung, Wing Hoi
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2011, 37 (07) : 1120 - 1133
  • [40] The Application of Deep Learning for Classification of Alzheimer's Disease Stages by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data
    Irfan, Muhammad
    Shahrestani, Seyed
    ElKhodr, Mahmoud
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, : 18 - 25