Adenocarcinoma In Situ of the Uterine Cervix (AIS) Treated by Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure Strategy: An Observational Study

被引:0
|
作者
Soegaard-Andersen, Erik [1 ,3 ]
Frandsen, Anna Poulsgaard [2 ]
Sandahl, Preben [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Aalborg, Denmark
[2] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Pathol, Aalborg, Denmark
[3] Aalborg Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark
关键词
adenocarcinoma in situ; uterine cervix; LEEP conization; conservative strategy; long-term follow-up; CONE MARGINS; MANAGEMENT; INSITU; CONIZATION; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1097/LGT.0000000000000797
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
ObjectivesEvaluation of the results of treatment of adenocarcinoma in situ by loop electrosurgical excision procedure and the safety of a conservative strategy.MethodsIdentification of all cases of adenocarcinoma in situ treated by loop electrosurgical excision procedure at our institution and follow-up by a conservative strategy. Completeness of the identification of all cases was secured by data from the National Pathology Registry. The treatment strategy was based on cytologic follow-up performed by a general practitioner and, irrespective of margin status of the cone, only the results of the postoperative surveillance were indicative of further treatment.ResultsA total of 224 patients were identified. The overall recurrence rate with a mean follow-up time of 87.8 months was 7.6% (17/224). The recurrence rate in patients with involved margins was significantly higher than in patients with uninvolved margins, 15.7% vs 5.2%, respectively. Six recurrences were diagnosed at first examination 6 months postconization in patients with involved margins. They were treated with hysterectomy in 4 cases and reconization in 1 case. If involvement of margins alone had been an indication of further therapy (hysterectomy or reconization) immediately after conization, the conservative management strategy prevented 46 surgical procedures. Two cases of invasive cancer were diagnosed during follow-up, 150 months and 196 months after primary treatment, and after normal follow-up examinations. These 2 cases must be considered de novo cases and cannot be considered treatment failures.ConclusionThe conservative management strategy thus seems safe, and unnecessary surgical procedures were avoided.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 152
页数:4
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Outcome of Persistent Low-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Treated With Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
    Spinillo, Arsenio
    Gardella, Barbara
    Iacobone, Anna Daniela
    Dominoni, Mattia
    Cesari, Stefania
    Alberizzi, Paola
    JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2016, 20 (04) : 307 - 311
  • [22] Exploring uterine involvement in hysterectomy samples following conization for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: Insights from a multicenter study by the FRANCOGYN group
    Le Gac, Marjolaine
    Benoit, Louise
    Koual, Meriem
    Bentivegna, Enrica
    Bolze, Pierre-Adrien
    Kerbage, Yohan
    Raimond, Emilie
    Lecointre, Lise
    Carcopino, Xavier
    Canlorbe, Geoffroy
    Philip, Charles-Andre
    Nguyen-Xuan, Huyen-Thu
    Bats, Anne-Sophie
    Azais, Henri
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 53 (09)
  • [23] Repeat low-grade squamous intraepithelial cytology with unsatisfactory colposcopy treated by the loop electrosurgical excision procedure a retrospective study
    Liu, Yun
    Li, Changdong
    Wang, Jiandong
    Zhang, Weiyuan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 31 (06) : 632 - 635
  • [24] A pilot study comparing efficacy of a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia excisor with loop electrosurgical excision procedure
    Sanu, Olaleye
    Pal, Alak
    George, Samuel
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2010, 151 (01) : 91 - 95
  • [25] Loop electrosurgical excision procedure combined with cold coagulation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and adenocarcinoma in-situ: a feasible treatment with a low risk of residual/recurrent disease
    Yang, Eun Jung
    Kim, Nae Ry
    Choi, Ji Yeon
    Kim, Wook Youn
    Lee, Sun Joo
    INFECTIOUS AGENTS AND CANCER, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [26] Comparison of Cold-Knife Conization versus Loop Electrosurgical Excision for Cervical Adenocarcinoma In Situ (ACIS): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jiang, Yanming
    Chen, Changxian
    Li, Li
    PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):
  • [27] Long-Term Follow-Up Outcomes in Women with In Situ/Microinvasive Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix Undergoing Conservative Treatment-Cervical Adenocarcinoma Study Group Italian Society of Colposcopy and Cervico-Vaginal Pathology
    Giannella, Luca
    Delli Carpini, Giovanni
    Di Giuseppe, Jacopo
    Grelloni, Camilla
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Dri, Marco
    Sopracordevole, Francesco
    Clemente, Nicolo
    Giorda, Giorgio
    De Vincenzo, Rosa
    Evangelista, Maria Teresa
    Gardella, Barbara
    Dominoni, Mattia
    Monti, Ermelinda
    Alessi, Chiara
    Alessandrini, Lara
    Guerriero, Angela
    Pagan, Alessio
    Caretto, Marta
    Ghelardi, Alessandro
    Amadori, Andrea
    Origoni, Massimo
    Barbero, Maggiorino
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    Simoncini, Tommaso
    Vercellini, Paolo
    Spinillo, Arsenio
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Ciavattini, Andrea
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [28] Literature Review of Cervical Regeneration after Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure, and Study Project (CeVaLEP) Proposal
    Luse, Laura
    Urtane, Anda Kivite
    Lisovaja, Ija
    Jermakova, Irina
    Donders, Gilbert G. G.
    Vedmedovska, Natalija
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (08)
  • [29] Significance of human papillomavirus genotyping with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated by a loop electrosurgical excision procedure
    Kang, Woo Dae
    Oh, Min Jeong
    Kim, Seok Mo
    Nam, Jong Hee
    Park, Chang Soo
    Choi, Ho Sun
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 203 (01) : 72.e1 - 72.e6
  • [30] In Situ/Microinvasive Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Cervix and HPV-Type Impact: Pathologic Features, Treatment Options, and Follow-Up Outcomes-Cervical Adenocarcinoma Study Group (CAS-Group)
    Giannella, Luca
    Delli Carpini, Giovanni
    Di Giuseppe, Jacopo
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Sopracordevole, Francesco
    Clemente, Nicolo
    Giorda, Giorgio
    De Vincenzo, Rosa Pasqualina
    Evangelista, Maria Teresa
    Gardella, Barbara
    Dominoni, Mattia
    Monti, Ermelinda
    Alessi, Chiara
    Alessandrini, Lara
    Pagan, Alessio
    Caretto, Marta
    Ghelardi, Alessandro
    Amadori, Andrea
    Origoni, Massimo
    Barbero, Maggiorino
    Raspagliesi, Francesco
    Simoncini, Tommaso
    Vercellini, Paolo
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Ciavattini, Andrea
    CANCERS, 2023, 15 (11)