Surveillance duplex ultrasound prompted interventions after carotid endarterectomy

被引:0
作者
Clark, Abigail [1 ]
McMackin, Katherine K. [1 ]
Knapp, Kristen [2 ]
Zemela, Mark [1 ]
Tjaden Jr, Bruce [1 ]
Batista, Philip [1 ]
Carpenter, Jeffrey P. [1 ]
Lombardi, Joseph, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Cooper Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, 3 Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ 08103 USA
[2] Cooper Univ Hosp, Div Gen Surg, DEPT GEN SURG, CAMDEN, NJ 08103 USA
关键词
Carotid stenosis; Carotid endarterectomy; Duplex ultrasound; PROGRESSION; STENOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2023.10.001
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Current societal guidelines recommend duplex ultrasound (DUS) surveillance beyond 30 days after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for patients with risk factors for restenosis or who underwent primary closure. However, the appropriate duration of this surveillance has not yet been identified, and the rate at which DUS surveillance prompts intervention is unknown. Multiple calls for decreasing health care spending that does not provide value, including unnecessary testing, have been made. The purpose of this study was to examine the rate of intervention prompted by surveillance DUS on the ipsilateral or contralateral carotid artery after CEA and determine the value of continued surveillance by determining the rate of DUS-prompted intervention. Methods: A single -center, retrospective chart review of all patients older than 18 years who had undergone CEA from August 2009 to July 2022 was performed. Patients with at least one postoperative duplex in our Intersocietal Accreditation Council -accredited ultrasound lab were included. Exclusion criteria were patients with incomplete medical charts or patients who underwent a concomitant procedure. The primary end point was return to the operating room for subsequent intervention based on abnormal surveillance DUS findings. Secondary end points were the number of postoperative surveillance duplexes, duration of surveillance, and incidence of perioperative stroke. The study participant data were queried for patients who had a diagnosis of stroke that occurred following their procedure. Results: A total 767 patients, accounting for 771 procedures, were included in this study, which resulted in 2145 ultrasound scans. A total of 40 (5.2%) patients required 44 subsequent interventions that were prompted by DUS surveillance scans. The average number of ultrasound scans per patient was 2.8 (range: 0-14), and the average duration of surveillance was 26.4 months (range: 0-155 months). Of the 767 patients, 669 (87.2%) had a unilateral CEA. A total of 62 of 767 (8.1%) patients had planned endarterectomies on the contralateral side based on initial imaging, not prompted by interval DUS surveillance scans. Of 767 patients, 28 (3.7%) patients who underwent CEA had a subsequent procedure for progression of contralateral disease, which was prompted by duplex surveillance scans. The average duration between index CEA and intervention on contralateral carotid was 29.57 months (range: 3-81 months). A total of 11 patients, accounting for 12 procedures, underwent a subsequent procedure for restenosis of their ipsilateral carotid, prompted by duplex surveillance scans. The average duration between index CEA and reintervention on the ipsilateral carotid was 17.9 months (range: 4-70 months). Three of 767 (0.4%) patients in total were identified as having a perioperative stroke. Conclusions: The overall rate of ipsilateral reintervention after CEA is low. A small percentage of patients will progress their contralateral disease, ultimately requiring surgical intervention. These data suggest that regular duplex surveillance after CEA is warranted for patients with at least moderate contralateral disease; however, the yield is low for ipsilateral restenosis after 36 months based on this single institution study. Further study is needed to better delineate which patients need follow-up to decrease unnecessary testing while still targeting patients most at risk of restenosis or contralateral progression of disease. (J Vasc Surg 2024;79:280-6.)
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 286
页数:7
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Natural history of carotid artery stenosis contralateral to endarterectomy: Results from two randomized prospective trials - Discussion
    Lamparello, PJ
    AbuRahma, AF
    Pappas, PJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 38 (06) : 1161 - 1161
  • [2] Society for Vascular Surgery clinical practice guidelines for management of extracranial cerebrovascular disease
    AbuRahma, Ali F.
    Avgerinos, Efthymios D.
    Chang, Robert W.
    Darling, R. Clement, III
    Duncan, Audra A.
    Forbes, Thomas L.
    Malas, Mahmoud B.
    Murad, Mohammad Hassan
    Perler, Bruce Alan
    Powell, Richard J.
    Rockman, Caron B.
    Zhou, Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 75 (01) : 4S - 22S
  • [3] The value and economic analysis of routine postoperative carotid duplex ultrasound surveillance after carotid endarterectomy
    AbuRahma, Ali F.
    Srivastava, Mohit
    AbuRahma, Zachary
    Jackson, Will
    Mousa, Albeir
    Stone, Patrick A.
    Dean, L. Scott
    Green, Jason
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 62 (02) : 378 - 383
  • [4] Progression of atherosclerosis in asymptomatic carotid arteries after contralateral. endarterectomy: A 10 year prospective study
    Ballotta, Enzo
    Da Giau, Giuseppe
    Meneghetti, Giorgio
    Barbon, Bruno
    Militello, Carmelo
    Baracchini, Claudio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 45 (03) : 516 - 522
  • [5] Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid-Artery Stenosis
    Brott, Thomas G.
    Hobson, Robert W., II
    Howard, George
    Roubin, Gary S.
    Clark, Wayne M.
    Brooks, William
    Mackey, Ariane
    Hill, Michael D.
    Leimgruber, Pierre P.
    Sheffet, Alice J.
    Howard, Virginia J.
    Moore, Wesley S.
    Voeks, Jenifer H.
    Hopkins, L. Nelson
    Cutlip, Donald E.
    Cohen, David J.
    Popma, Jeffrey J.
    Ferguson, Robert D.
    Cohen, Stanley N.
    Blackshear, Joseph L.
    Silver, Frank L.
    Mohr, J. P.
    Lal, Brajesh K.
    Meschia, James F.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 363 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [6] Progression of asymptomatic carotid stenosis despite optimal medical therapy
    Conrad, Mark F.
    Baloum, Valy
    Mukhopadhyay, Shankha
    Garg, Ashu
    Patel, Virendra I.
    Cambria, Richard P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 58 (01) : 128 - +
  • [7] Use of Health Information Exchange and Repeat Imaging Costs
    Jung, Hye-Young
    Vest, Joshua R.
    Unruh, Mark A.
    Kern, Lisa M.
    Kaushal, Rainu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 12 (12) : 1364 - 1370
  • [8] Kallmayer M, 2014, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V55, P33
  • [9] A systematic review of contralateral carotid stenosis progression after carotid endarterectomy
    Leopardi, Marco
    Bisogno, Francesca
    Maggipinto, Annamaria
    Cofini, Vincenza
    Necozione, Stefano
    Ventura, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 72 (06) : 2167 - 2173
  • [10] Reduction in US Health Care Spending Required to Meet the Institute of Medicine's 2030 Target
    Mac McCullough, J.
    Speer, Matthew
    Magnan, Sanne
    Fielding, Jonathan E.
    Kindig, David
    Teutsch, Steven M.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 110 (12) : 1735 - 1740