Improving the estimation of atmospheric water vapor pressure using interpretable long short-term memory networks

被引:4
作者
Gao, B. [1 ]
Coon, E. T. [1 ]
Thornton, P. E. [1 ]
Lu, D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Environm Sci Div, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Computat Sci & Engn Div, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA
基金
美国能源部;
关键词
Long short-term memory; Interpretable deep learning; Static attributes; Atmospheric humidity; Atmospheric water vapor pressure; RELATIVE-HUMIDITY; SURFACE; MODEL; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; CLIMATE; DATASET; AIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.109907
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Atmospheric water vapor pressure is an essential meteorological control on land surface and hydrologic processes. As it is not as frequently observed as other meteorologic conditions, it is often inferred through the August-Roche-Magnus formula by simply assuming dew point and daily minimum temperatures are equivalent or by empirically correlating the two temperatures using an aridity correction. The performance of both methods varies considerably across different regions and during different time periods; obtaining consistently accurate estimates across space and time remains a great challenge. Here, an interpretable Long Short-Term Memory (iLSTM) network conditioned on static, location specific attributes is proposed to estimate the daily vapor pressure. This approach allows for training a single transferable model using ensemble data from multiple sites and exploring the quantitative dependency of vapor pressure prediction on multiple environmental variables and their histories. To evaluate this approach, three iLSTM model configurations were developed, each considering different site attributes as static variables. For each configuration, multiple model realizations were trained using 83 FLUXNET sites in the United States and Canada, where each realization corresponds to different withheld groups of sites used for model evaluation. Results show that the iLSTM networks noticeably improve the estimation accuracy in comparison with the two assumption-based methods for most sites, reducing the failure rate from 32 % to 10.9 % for the best iLSTM model configuration. Additionally, this network provides reasonable insights into both the relative importance of the time-series input variables and their temporal importance. This method is found to be effective for imputing vapor pressure across space and time.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Predictability of relative humidity by two artificial intelligence techniques using noisy data from two Californian gauging stations [J].
Khatibi, Rahman ;
Naghipour, Leila ;
Ghorbani, Mohammad Ali ;
Aalami, Mohammad Taghi .
NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2013, 23 (7-8) :2241-2252
[22]   An improved method for estimating surface humidity from daily minimum temperature [J].
Kimball, JS ;
Running, SW ;
Nemani, R .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1997, 85 (1-2) :87-98
[23]   Machine learning assisted hybrid models can improve streamflow simulation in diverse catchments across the conterminous US [J].
Konapala, Goutam ;
Kao, Shih-Chieh ;
Painter, Scott L. ;
Lu, Dan .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (10)
[24]   World map of the Koppen-Geiger climate classification updated [J].
Kottek, Markus ;
Grieser, Jorgen ;
Beck, Christoph ;
Rudolf, Bruno ;
Rubel, Franz .
METEOROLOGISCHE ZEITSCHRIFT, 2006, 15 (03) :259-263
[25]   Towards learning universal, regional, and local hydrological behaviors via machine learning applied to large-sample datasets [J].
Kratzert, Frederik ;
Klotz, Daniel ;
Shalev, Guy ;
Klambauer, Guenter ;
Hochreiter, Sepp ;
Nearing, Grey .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2019, 23 (12) :5089-5110
[26]   Rainfall-runoff modelling using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks [J].
Kratzert, Frederik ;
Klotz, Daniel ;
Brenner, Claire ;
Schulz, Karsten ;
Herrnegger, Mathew .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2018, 22 (11) :6005-6022
[27]   An attention-aware LSTM model for soil moisture and soil temperature prediction [J].
Li, Qingliang ;
Zhu, Yuheng ;
Wei Shangguan ;
Wang, Xuezhi ;
Lu Li ;
Yu, Fanhua .
GEODERMA, 2022, 409
[28]   Improving net ecosystem CO2 flux prediction using memory-based interpretable machine learning [J].
Liu, Siyan ;
Lu, Dan ;
Ricciuto, Daniel ;
Walker, Anthony .
2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING WORKSHOPS, ICDMW, 2022, :1111-1119
[29]  
Lu D., 2022, Technical report
[30]   Streamflow Simulation in Data-Scarce Basins Using Bayesian and Physics-Informed Machine Learning Models [J].
Lu, Dan ;
Konapala, Goutam ;
Painter, Scott L. ;
Kao, Shih-Chieh ;
Gangrade, Sudershan .
JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2021, 22 (06) :1421-1438