Inverse planning of lung radiotherapy with photon and proton beams using a discrete ordinates Boltzmann solver

被引:1
作者
Bedford, James L. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, Joint Dept Phys, London SM2 5PT, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Fdn Trust, London SM2 5PT, England
关键词
inverse planning; discrete ordinates; linear Boltzmann transport equations; proton therapy; VMAT; MONTE-CARLO; DOSE CALCULATION; COMPLICATION PROBABILITY; ANALYTICAL APPROXIMATION; RADIATION-THERAPY; TISSUE PARAMETERS; CT NUMBERS; ACUROS XB; OPTIMIZATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ad1cf7
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. A discrete ordinates Boltzmann solver has recently been developed for use as a fast and accurate dose engine for calculation of photon and proton beams. The purpose of this study is to apply the algorithm to the inverse planning process for photons and protons and to evaluate the impact that this has on the quality of the final solution. Approach. The method was implemented into an iterative least-squares inverse planning optimiser, with the Boltzmann solver used every 20 iterations over the total of 100 iterations. Elemental dose distributions for the intensity modulation and the dose changes at the intermediate iterations were calculated by a convolution algorithm for photons and a simple analytical model for protons. The method was evaluated for 12 patients in the heterogeneous tissue environment encountered in radiotherapy of lung tumours. Photon arc and proton arc treatments were considered in this study. The results were compared with those for use of the Boltzmann solver solely at the end of inverse planning or not at all. Main results. Application of the Boltzmann solver at the end of inverse planning shows the dose heterogeneity in the planning target volume to be greater than calculated by convolution and empirical methods, with the median root-mean-square dose deviation increasing from 3.7 to 5.3 for photons and from 1.9 to 3.4 for proton arcs. Use of discrete ordinates throughout inverse planning enables homogeneity of target coverage to be maintained throughout, the median root-mean-square dose deviation being 3.6 for photons and 2.3 for protons. Dose to critical structures is similar with discrete ordinates and conventional methods. Time for inverse planning with discrete ordinates takes around 1-2 h using a contemporary computing environment. Significance. By incorporating the Boltzmann solver into an iterative least squares inverse planning optimiser, accurate dose calculation in a heterogeneous medium is obtained throughout inverse planning, with the result that the final dose distribution is of the highest quality.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [41] A procedure for calculation of monitor units for passively scattered proton radiotherapy beams
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Zhu, X. Ronald
    Arjomandy, Bijan
    Ciangaru, George
    Lii, MingFwu
    Amos, Richard
    Wu, Richard
    Gillin, Michael T.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (11) : 5088 - 5097
  • [42] The calibration of CT Hounsfield units for radiotherapy treatment planning
    Schneider, U
    Pedroni, E
    Lomax, A
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1996, 41 (01) : 111 - 124
  • [43] Correlation between CT numbers and tissue parameters needed for Monte Carlo simulations of clinical dose distributions
    Schneider, W
    Bortfeld, T
    Schlegel, W
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2000, 45 (02) : 459 - 478
  • [44] Proton Arc Reduces Range Uncertainty Effects and Improves Conformality Compared With Photon Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Seco, Joao
    Gu, Guan
    Marcelos, Tiago
    Kooy, Hanne
    Willers, Henning
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (01): : 188 - 194
  • [45] Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Proton Beam-Based Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: Dosimetric Comparison With Photon Plans Highlights Importance of Range Uncertainty
    Seco, Joao
    Panahandeh, Hamid Reza
    Westover, Kenneth
    Adams, Judith
    Willers, Henning
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (01): : 354 - 361
  • [46] Potential pitfalls of the PTV concept in dose-to-medium planning optimization
    Sterpin, E.
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 32 (09): : 1103 - 1110
  • [47] Robust radiotherapy planning
    Unkelbach, Jan
    Alber, Markus
    Bangert, Mark
    Bokrantz, Rasmus
    Chan, Timothy C. Y.
    Deasy, Joseph O.
    Fredriksson, Albin
    Gorissen, Bram L.
    van Herk, Marcel
    Liu, Wei
    Mahmoudzadeh, Houra
    Nohadani, Omid
    Siebers, Jeffrey V.
    Witte, Marnix
    Xu, Huijun
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2018, 63 (22)
  • [48] Conversion of CT numbers into tissue parameters for Monte Carlo dose calculations: a multi-centre study
    Vanderstraeten, Barbara
    Chin, Pik Wai
    Fix, Michael
    Leal, Antonio
    Mora, Grisel
    Reynaert, Nick
    Seco, Joao
    Soukup, Martin
    Spezi, Emiliano
    De Neve, Wilfried
    Thierens, Hubert
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (03) : 539 - 562
  • [49] Vassiliev ON, 2017, BIOL MED PHYS BIOMED, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-44141-2
  • [50] Verhaegen F., 2013, Monte Carlo Techniques in Radiation Therapy, P63