Bowel Preparation Efficacy and Safety of 1 L vs 2 L Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:3
作者
Jeon, Han Jo [1 ]
Keum, Bora [1 ]
Bang, Eun Ju [1 ]
Lee, Kang Won [1 ]
Kim, Sang Hyun [1 ]
Lee, Jae Min [1 ]
Choi, Hyuk Soon [1 ]
Kim, Eun Sun [1 ]
Jeen, Yoon Tae [1 ]
Lee, Hong Sik [1 ]
Chun, Hoon Jai [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; PEG SOLUTION; LAVAGE; GUIDELINES; SOCIETY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.14309/ctg.0000000000000532
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (PEG/Asc) is a well-established bowel preparation solution with guaranteed effectiveness and safety. A new low-volume agent, 1 L-PEG/Asc, has recently been released. This study aimed to compare the bowel cleansing efficacy and safety of 1 L-PEG/Asc and 2 LPEG/Asc administered to adult outpatients in a split-dose manner. METHODS: Outpatients undergoing colonoscopy enrolled in a single-blinded, single-center, noninferiority study conducted between July and October 2021 were randomized in a 1:1 manner to a 1 L-PEG/Asc or 2 LPEG/Asc group. Bowel cleansing was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and the Harefield Cleansing Scale in intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. RESULTS: Twohundred forty participants were randomized andallocated, with 120 patients in the 1 L and 2 L-PEG/Asc groups, respectively. Noninferiority was demonstrated for overall successful bowel cleansing (BBPS: 92.5% vs 90.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 20.054 to 0.087) and the high-quality cleansing rate of the right-sided colon (BBPS5 3, 40.0% vs 35.8%; 95% CI, 20.082 to 0.165; Harefield Cleansing Scale >= 3, 50.0% vs 43.3%; 95% CI, -0.060 to 0.194) in the intention-to-treat population. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups ([82/120] 68.3% vs [72/120] 60.0%; P 5 0.178). The tolerability, acceptability, and compliance rates of both regimens were similar, with no significant differences. DISCUSSION: Compared with 2 L-PEG/Asc, 1 L-PEG/Asc achieved successful overall bowel cleansing efficacy with high-quality cleansing in the proximal colon and proved its noninferiority. Therefore, 1 L-PEG/Asc is an acceptable alternative bowel cleansing solution.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration: Application to Healthy Patients Undergoing Elective Procedures An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters
    Apfelbaum, Jeffrey L.
    Caplan, Robert A.
    Connis, Richard T.
    Epstein, Burton S.
    Nickinovich, David G.
    Warner, Mark A.
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 114 (03) : 495 - 511
  • [2] A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda
    Aronchick, CA
    Lipshutz, WH
    Wright, SH
    Dufrayne, F
    Bergman, G
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (03) : 346 - 352
  • [3] Fatal dysnatraemia caused by elective colonoscopy
    Ayus, JC
    Levine, R
    Arieff, AI
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7385): : 382 - 384
  • [4] Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Belsey, J.
    Epstein, O.
    Heresbach, D.
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 25 (04) : 373 - 384
  • [5] Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate: a randomized phase 3 trial
    Bisschops, Raf
    Manning, Jonathan
    Clayton, Lucy B.
    Shing, Richard Ng Kwet
    Alvarez-Gonzalez, Marco
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 51 (01) : 60 - 72
  • [6] Hyponatraemia as a complication of colonoscopy
    Cohen, CD
    Keuneke, C
    Schlemann, U
    Schroppel, B
    Siegert, S
    Rascher, W
    Gross, M
    Schlondorff, D
    [J]. LANCET, 2001, 357 (9252) : 282 - 283
  • [7] Clinical trial: 2-L polyethylene glycol-based lavage solutions for colonoscopy preparation - a randomized, single-blind study of two formulations
    Cohen, L. B.
    Sanyal, S. M.
    von Althann, C.
    Bodian, C.
    Whitson, M.
    Bamji, N.
    Miller, K. M.
    Mavronicolas, W.
    Burd, S.
    Freedman, J.
    Aisenberg, J.
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 32 (05) : 637 - 644
  • [8] Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate
    DeMicco, Michael P.
    Clayton, Lucy B.
    Pilot, Jeff
    Epstein, Michael S.
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (03) : 677 - +
  • [9] Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG plus electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy
    Ell, Christian
    Fischbach, Wolfgang
    Bronisch, Hans-Joachim
    Dertinger, Stefan
    Layer, Peter
    Ruenzi, Michael
    Schneider, Thomas
    Kachel, Guenther
    Grueger, Joerg
    Koellinger, Michael
    Nagell, Waltraud
    Goerg, Karl-Josel
    Wanitschke, Roland
    Gruss, Hans-Juergen
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (04) : 883 - 893
  • [10] Validation of the Harefield Cleansing Scale: a tool for the evaluation of bowel cleansing quality in both research and clinical practice
    Halphen, Marc
    Heresbach, Denis
    Gruss, Hans-Jurgen
    Belsey, Jonathan
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 78 (01) : 121 - 131