Bowel Preparation Efficacy and Safety of 1 L vs 2 L Polyethylene Glycol With Ascorbic Acid for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:3
作者
Jeon, Han Jo [1 ]
Keum, Bora [1 ]
Bang, Eun Ju [1 ]
Lee, Kang Won [1 ]
Kim, Sang Hyun [1 ]
Lee, Jae Min [1 ]
Choi, Hyuk Soon [1 ]
Kim, Eun Sun [1 ]
Jeen, Yoon Tae [1 ]
Lee, Hong Sik [1 ]
Chun, Hoon Jai [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Dept Internal Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
COLORECTAL-CANCER; PEG SOLUTION; LAVAGE; GUIDELINES; SOCIETY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.14309/ctg.0000000000000532
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid (PEG/Asc) is a well-established bowel preparation solution with guaranteed effectiveness and safety. A new low-volume agent, 1 L-PEG/Asc, has recently been released. This study aimed to compare the bowel cleansing efficacy and safety of 1 L-PEG/Asc and 2 LPEG/Asc administered to adult outpatients in a split-dose manner. METHODS: Outpatients undergoing colonoscopy enrolled in a single-blinded, single-center, noninferiority study conducted between July and October 2021 were randomized in a 1:1 manner to a 1 L-PEG/Asc or 2 LPEG/Asc group. Bowel cleansing was assessed using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) and the Harefield Cleansing Scale in intention-to-treat and per-protocol populations. RESULTS: Twohundred forty participants were randomized andallocated, with 120 patients in the 1 L and 2 L-PEG/Asc groups, respectively. Noninferiority was demonstrated for overall successful bowel cleansing (BBPS: 92.5% vs 90.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 20.054 to 0.087) and the high-quality cleansing rate of the right-sided colon (BBPS5 3, 40.0% vs 35.8%; 95% CI, 20.082 to 0.165; Harefield Cleansing Scale >= 3, 50.0% vs 43.3%; 95% CI, -0.060 to 0.194) in the intention-to-treat population. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups ([82/120] 68.3% vs [72/120] 60.0%; P 5 0.178). The tolerability, acceptability, and compliance rates of both regimens were similar, with no significant differences. DISCUSSION: Compared with 2 L-PEG/Asc, 1 L-PEG/Asc achieved successful overall bowel cleansing efficacy with high-quality cleansing in the proximal colon and proved its noninferiority. Therefore, 1 L-PEG/Asc is an acceptable alternative bowel cleansing solution.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration: Application to Healthy Patients Undergoing Elective Procedures An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters [J].
Apfelbaum, Jeffrey L. ;
Caplan, Robert A. ;
Connis, Richard T. ;
Epstein, Burton S. ;
Nickinovich, David G. ;
Warner, Mark A. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 114 (03) :495-511
[2]   A novel tableted purgative for colonoscopic preparation: efficacy and safety comparisons with Colyte and Fleet Phospho-Soda [J].
Aronchick, CA ;
Lipshutz, WH ;
Wright, SH ;
Dufrayne, F ;
Bergman, G .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (03) :346-352
[3]   Fatal dysnatraemia caused by elective colonoscopy [J].
Ayus, JC ;
Levine, R ;
Arieff, AI .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7385) :382-384
[4]   Systematic review: oral bowel preparation for colonoscopy [J].
Belsey, J. ;
Epstein, O. ;
Heresbach, D. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 25 (04) :373-384
[5]   Colon cleansing efficacy and safety with 1 L NER1006 versus 2 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate: a randomized phase 3 trial [J].
Bisschops, Raf ;
Manning, Jonathan ;
Clayton, Lucy B. ;
Shing, Richard Ng Kwet ;
Alvarez-Gonzalez, Marco .
ENDOSCOPY, 2019, 51 (01) :60-72
[6]   Hyponatraemia as a complication of colonoscopy [J].
Cohen, CD ;
Keuneke, C ;
Schlemann, U ;
Schroppel, B ;
Siegert, S ;
Rascher, W ;
Gross, M ;
Schlondorff, D .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9252) :282-283
[7]   Clinical trial: 2-L polyethylene glycol-based lavage solutions for colonoscopy preparation - a randomized, single-blind study of two formulations [J].
Cohen, L. B. ;
Sanyal, S. M. ;
von Althann, C. ;
Bodian, C. ;
Whitson, M. ;
Bamji, N. ;
Miller, K. M. ;
Mavronicolas, W. ;
Burd, S. ;
Freedman, J. ;
Aisenberg, J. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 32 (05) :637-644
[8]   Novel 1 L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 for overall and right-sided colon cleansing: a randomized controlled phase 3 trial versus trisulfate [J].
DeMicco, Michael P. ;
Clayton, Lucy B. ;
Pilot, Jeff ;
Epstein, Michael S. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (03) :677-+
[9]   Randomized trial of low-volume PEG solution versus standard PEG plus electrolytes for bowel cleansing before colonoscopy [J].
Ell, Christian ;
Fischbach, Wolfgang ;
Bronisch, Hans-Joachim ;
Dertinger, Stefan ;
Layer, Peter ;
Ruenzi, Michael ;
Schneider, Thomas ;
Kachel, Guenther ;
Grueger, Joerg ;
Koellinger, Michael ;
Nagell, Waltraud ;
Goerg, Karl-Josel ;
Wanitschke, Roland ;
Gruss, Hans-Juergen .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (04) :883-893
[10]   Validation of the Harefield Cleansing Scale: a tool for the evaluation of bowel cleansing quality in both research and clinical practice [J].
Halphen, Marc ;
Heresbach, Denis ;
Gruss, Hans-Jurgen ;
Belsey, Jonathan .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2013, 78 (01) :121-131