Explainability analysis in predictive models based on machine learning techniques on the risk of hospital readmissions

被引:4
|
作者
Bedoya, Juan Camilo Lopera [1 ]
Castro, Jose Lisandro Aguilar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ EAFIT, GIDITIC, Medellin, Colombia
[2] Univ Los Andes, CEMISID, Merida, Venezuela
[3] IMDEA Networks Inst, Madrid, Spain
关键词
Explainability analysis; Prediction models; Machine learning; Hospital readmission; Health decision-making systems;
D O I
10.1007/s12553-023-00794-8
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposeAnalyzing the risk of re-hospitalization of patients with chronic diseases allows the healthcare institutions can deliver accurate preventive care to reduce hospital admissions, and the planning of the medical spaces and resources. Thus, the research question is: Is it possible to use artificial intelligence to study the risk of re-hospitalization of patients?MethodsThis article presents several models to predict when a patient can be hospitalized again, after its discharge. In addition, an explainability analysis is carried out with the predictive models to extract information to determine the degree of importance of the predictors/descriptors. Particularly, this article makes a comparative analysis of different explainability techniques in the study context.ResultsThe best model is a classifier based on decision trees with an F1-Score of 83% followed by LGMB with an F1-Score of 67%. For these models, Shapley values were calculated as a method of explainability. Concerning the quality of the explainability of the predictive models, the stability metric was used. According to this metric, more variability is evidenced in the explanations of the decision trees, where only 4 attributes are very stable (21%) and 1 attribute is unstable. With respect to the LGBM-based model, there are 12 stable attributes (63%) and no unstable attributes. Thus, in terms of explainability, the LGBM-based model is better.ConclusionsAccording to the results of the explanations generated by the best predictive models, LGBM-based predictive model presents more stable variables. Thus, it generates greater confidence in the explanations it provides.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 108
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of machine learning methods with logistic regression analysis in creating predictive models for risk of critical in-hospital events in COVID-19 patients on hospital admission
    Sievering, Aaron W.
    Wohlmuth, Peter
    Gessler, Nele
    Gunawardene, Melanie A.
    Herrlinger, Klaus
    Bein, Berthold
    Arnold, Dirk
    Bergmann, Martin
    Nowak, Lorenz
    Gloeckner, Christian
    Koch, Ina
    Bachmann, Martin
    Herborn, Christoph U.
    Stang, Axel
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [42] Leveraging Electronic Health Records and Machine Learning to Tailor Nursing Care for Patients at High Risk for Readmissions
    Brom, Heather
    Carthon, J. Margo Brooks
    Ikeaba, Uchechukwu
    Chittams, Jesse
    JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2020, 35 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [43] A survey for user behavior analysis based on machine learning techniques: current models and applications
    Alejandro G. Martín
    Alberto Fernández-Isabel
    Isaac Martín de Diego
    Marta Beltrán
    Applied Intelligence, 2021, 51 : 6029 - 6055
  • [44] Artificial intelligence-based multiclass diabetes risk stratification for big data embedded with explainability: From machine learning to attention models
    Tiwari, Ekta
    Gupta, Siddharth
    Pavulla, Anudeep
    Al-Maini, Mustafa
    Singh, Rajesh
    Isenovic, Esma R.
    Chaudhary, Sumit
    Laird, John L.
    Mantella, Laura
    Johri, Amer M.
    Saba, Luca
    Suri, Jasjit S.
    BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2025, 106
  • [45] Predictive Value of Machine Learning Models for Cerebral Edema Risk in Stroke Patients: A Meta-Analysis
    Deng, Qi
    Yang, Yu
    Bai, Hongyu
    Li, Fei
    Zhang, Wenluo
    He, Rong
    Li, Yuming
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [46] A Neurosurgical Readmissions Reduction Program in an Academic Hospital Leveraging Machine Learning, Workflow Analysis, and Simulation
    Wu, Tzu-Chun
    Kim, Abraham
    Tsai, Ching-Tzu
    Gao, Andy
    Ghuman, Taran
    Paul, Anne
    Castillo, Alexandra
    Cheng, Joseph
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    Ngwenya, Laura B.
    Foreman, Brandon
    Wu, Danny T. Y.
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 15 (03): : 479 - 488
  • [47] Explainability-based Debugging of Machine Learning for Vulnerability Discovery
    Sotgiu, Angelo
    Pintor, Maura
    Biggio, Battista
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AVAILABILITY, RELIABILITY AND SECURITY, ARES 2022, 2022,
  • [48] Development of predictive models for density of hybrid nanofluids using different machine learning techniques
    Gupta, Amit Kumar
    Mathur, Priya
    Oyedeji, Mojeed Opeyemi
    Alade, Ibrahim Olanrewaju
    Qahtan, Talal F.
    Gupta, Sparsh
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART E-JOURNAL OF PROCESS MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 237 (05) : 1722 - 1739
  • [49] Machine learning based models for Cardiovascular risk prediction
    Rajliwall, Nitten S.
    Davey, Rachel
    Chetty, Girija
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND DATA ENGINEERING (ICMLDE 2018), 2018, : 142 - 148
  • [50] Assessing Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Hospital Readmission
    Alajmani, Samah
    Jambi, Kamal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 11 (02) : 377 - 384