Party direct control and corporate fraud: Evidence from China*

被引:1
|
作者
Liang, Quanxi [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zhimin [3 ,6 ]
Guan, Xin [4 ]
Qin, Wei [5 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Univ, Sch Econ, Nanning, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Univ, Guangxi Dev Strategy Inst, Nanning, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Sch Accounting, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Nankai Univ, Inst Finance & Dev, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[5] Guangxi Univ, Sch Econ, Nanning, Peoples R China
[6] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Guangzhou Higher Educ Mega Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE | 2023年 / 92卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Party direct control; Corporate fraud; Corporate governance; State-owned enterprise; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; GOVERNANCE; PERFORMANCE; EARNINGS; COMPENSATION; PRESSURE; COSTS; FIRM; CEOS;
D O I
10.1016/j.qref.2023.10.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study examines the impact of the involvement of Party committees of the Communist Party of China in the decision-making process of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in China on fraudulent activities. Based on a sample of 1180 listed SOEs covering the period 2004-2019, we present empirical evidence of a negative relationship between Party direct control and the likelihood of corporate fraud, mainly driven by the effect of Party participation in the board of directors. Additional evidence suggests that Party direct control raises the anticipated costs associated with fraud by facilitating the exposure of fraudulent activities and enhancing the likelihood of CEO dismissal upon the detection of wrongdoing. Furthermore, we observe that the negative association between party direct control and corporate fraud is weakened in firms with robust external monitoring mechanisms and significant levels of state ownership. Additionally, our findings reveal that the deterrent effect of Party direct control on corporate fraud is enhanced following the implementation of the 2015 "Discussion Precedence" reform, which bestowed Party committee members with increased decision-making authority in SOEs.
引用
收藏
页码:274 / 290
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CEO's poverty imprints and corporate financial fraud: Evidence from China
    Liu, Yang
    Zhang, Han
    Zhang, Fukang
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2023, 81
  • [32] Analyst coverage and corporate social responsibility decoupling: Evidence from China
    Zhang, Yi
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 29 (03) : 620 - 634
  • [33] Missing Analyst Forecasts and Corporate Fraud: Evidence from China
    Liuyang Ren
    Xi Zhong
    Liangyong Wan
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2022, 181 : 171 - 194
  • [34] Corporate Fraud and Accounting Firm Involvement: Evidence from China
    Wang, Jun
    Wang, Duo
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 15 (04)
  • [35] Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China
    Chen, Gongmeng
    Firth, Michael
    Gao, Daniel N.
    Rui, Oliver M.
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2006, 12 (03) : 424 - 448
  • [36] Equity Incentives and Corporate Fraud in China
    Lars Helge Hass
    Monika Tarsalewska
    Feng Zhan
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2016, 138 : 723 - 742
  • [37] Management's Materiality Criteria of Internal Control Weaknesses and Corporate Fraud: Evidence from China
    Wu, Xi
    Wang, Jun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING, 2018, 53 (01): : 1 - 19
  • [38] Effect of Place of Incorporation, Chinese Culture, and Business Practices on Corporate Fraud: Evidence from Hong Kong Listed Companies
    Pang, Josephine Chui-ling
    Lo, Simon Ming-sum
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2017, 46 (02) : 221 - 245
  • [39] Do financial analysts discourage or encourage corporate fraud? Empirical evidence from China
    Liu, Hui
    Yang, Bei
    Zhang, Junrui
    PACIFIC ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2021, 33 (01) : 81 - 113
  • [40] CEO Accountability for Corporate Fraud: Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China
    Chen, Jiandong
    Cumming, Douglas
    Hou, Wenxuan
    Lee, Edward
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2016, 138 (04) : 787 - 806