Seismic Response of Reinforced-Concrete One-Storey Precast Industrial Buildings with Horizontal Cladding Panels

被引:1
|
作者
Gams, Matija [1 ]
Staresinic, Gabrijela [2 ]
Isakovic, Tatjana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Civil & Geodet Engn, Jamova 2, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Godina Gradbenistvo Druge Storitve Doo, OIC Hrpelje 22, Hrpelje 6240, Slovenia
关键词
RC precast structures; horizontal RC cladding; sensitivity analysis; cladding connections; GROUND-MOTION; PERFORMANCE; CONNECTIONS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.3390/buildings13102519
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
An extensive parametric study of the seismic response of one-storey precast buildings with horizontal cladding panels frequently used in Central Europe was conducted to analyse the panels' influence on the overall response of buildings and to find out if the panels can be considered non-structural elements when they are attached to the main building with the connections typically used in practice in Central Europe. The studied structural system consisted of reinforced concrete columns and beams connected by dowels. Horizontal cladding panels were attached to columns using one of the most frequently used isostatic fastening systems. The top connections provided out-of-plane stability, and the bottom connections supported the panel in the vertical direction. The parametric study was preceded by extensive experimental research, including cyclic tests on connections and full-scale shaking table tests of whole buildings. The results of experiments were used to reveal the basic response mechanisms of panels and connections and to develop, validate and calibrate numerical models employed in the parametric study presented herein. Fifteen generalised structures with different masses and heights were subjected to 30 accelerograms with two peak ground acceleration (PGA) intensities of 0.3 g and 0.5 g, corresponding to significant damage and near-collapse limit states. The effects of the construction imperfections in connections, the silicon sealant panel-to-panel connections and different types of connections of the bottom panel to the foundation were analysed. The crucial parameter influencing the response was the displacement capacity of the connections, which was considerably affected by the construction imperfections and, consequently, difficult to estimate. It has been observed that in some buildings, particularly in shorter structures with smaller mass, cladding panels can have a somewhat more notable influence on the overall response. However, in general, when the considered types of connections are used, the panels can be considered as non-structural elements, which do not importantly influence the response of the main building. Owing to structural imperfections and relatively short available gaps, the failure of the considered top connections and falling of the panels is very likely in the high seismicity regions. In the most adverse cases, it can occur even in the moderate seismicity regions.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Seismic demand evaluation of reinforced-concrete buckling-restrained braces for precast concrete frames
    Oh, Shane
    Mohle, Jon
    Pearson, Lily A.
    Manning, Mark P.
    Weldon, Brad D.
    Kurama, Yahya C.
    PCI JOURNAL, 2024, 69 (04): : 58 - 76
  • [22] Influence of Masonry Infill on Seismic Design Factors of Reinforced-Concrete Buildings
    Shendkar, Mangeshkumar R.
    Kontoni, Denise-Penelope N.
    Mandal, Sasankasekhar
    Maiti, Pabitra Ranjan
    Harirchian, Ehsan
    Isik, Ercan
    SHOCK AND VIBRATION, 2022, 2022
  • [23] Modelling in-plane dynamic response of a fastening system for horizontal concrete facade panels in RC precast buildings
    Staresinic, Gabrijela
    Zoubek, Blaz
    Gams, Matija
    Isakovic, Tatjana
    Fischinger, Matej
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 224 (224)
  • [24] Influence of Closure External Panels Modelling on the Seismic Response of Non-Residential Precast Buildings
    Bellotti, Davide
    Cavalieri, Francesco
    Nascimbene, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 28 (01) : 288 - 304
  • [25] Site-Specific Seismic Analysis of Buildings Supported by Lightly Reinforced Precast Concrete Walls
    Weng, Xiangzhe
    Hoult, Ryan D.
    Lumantarna, Elisa
    CIVILENG, 2023, 4 (01): : 270 - 291
  • [26] Seismic response of reinforced concrete wall buildings with nonlinear coupling slabs
    Ramos, L.
    Hube, M. A.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2021, 234
  • [27] Irregularity of the Distribution of Masonry Infill Panels and Its Effect on the Seismic Collapse of Reinforced Concrete Buildings
    Carlos Vielma, Juan
    Aguiar, Roberto
    Frau, Carlos
    Zambrano, Abel
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (18):
  • [28] Influence of infill panels and their distribution on seismic behavior of existing reinforced concrete buildings
    Manfredi, Gaetano
    Ricci, Paolo
    Verderame, Gerardo M.
    Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 2012, 6 (SPEC. ISS. 1): : 236 - 253
  • [29] SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF REINFORCED-CONCRETE DUCTILE MOMENT-RESISTING FRAME BUILDINGS LOCATED IN DIFFERENT SEISMIC REGIONS
    ZHU, TJ
    TSO, WK
    HEIDEBRECHT, AC
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1992, 19 (04) : 688 - 710
  • [30] Seismic behavior of autoclaved aerated concrete low rise buildings with reinforced wall panels
    Gokmen, Furkan
    Binici, Baris
    Aldemir, Alper
    Taghipour, Armin
    Canbay, Erdem
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2019, 17 (07) : 3933 - 3957