Hybrid Deep Learning Algorithms for Dog Breed Identification-A Comparative Analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Valarmathi, B. [1 ]
Gupta, N. Srinivasa [2 ]
Prakash, G. [3 ]
Reddy, R. Hemadri [4 ]
Saravanan, S. [5 ]
Shanmugasundaram, P. [6 ]
机构
[1] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Informat Technol & Engn, Dept Software & Syst Engn, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Dept Mfg Engn, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Dept Database Syst, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
[4] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Adv Sci, Dept Math, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
[5] SASTRA, Srinivasa Ramanujan Ctr, Dept Elect & Commun Engn, Kumbakonam 612001, Tamil Nadu, India
[6] Mizan Tepi Univ, Coll Nat & Computat Sci, Dept Math, Mizan Teferi 5140, Ethiopia
关键词
EfficientNetV2M; hybrid of EfficientNetV2M; hybrid of inception and Xception; NasNet-Mobile; ResNet152V2; VGG19; Xception;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3297440
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Deep learning and computer vision algorithms will be applied to find the breed of the dog from an image. The goal is to have the user submit an image of a dog, and the model will choose one of the 120 breeds stated in the dataset to determine the dog's breed. The proposed work uses various deep learning algorithms like Xception, VGG19, NASNetMobile, EfficientNetV2M, ResNet152V2, Hybrid of Inception & Xception, and Hybrid of EfficientNetV2M, NASNetMobile, Inception & Xception to predict dog breeds. ResNet101, ResNet50, InceptionResNetV2, and Inception-v3 on the Stanford Dogs Standard Datasetswere used in the existing system. The proposed models are considered a hybrid of Inception-v3 & Xception and a hybrid of EfficientNetV2M, NASNetMobile, Inception & Xception. This hybrid model outperforms single models like Xception, VGG19, InceptionV3, ResNet50, and ResNet101.The authors used a transfer learning algorithm with data augmentation to increase their accuracy and achieved a validation accuracy score of 71.63% for ResNet101, 63.78% for ResNet50, 40.72% for InceptionResNetV2, and 34.84% for InceptionV3. This paper compares the proposed algorithms with existing ones like ResNet101, ResNet50, InceptionResNetV2, and InceptionV3. In the existing system, ResNet101 gave the highest accuracy of 71.63%. The proposed algorithms give a validation accuracy score of 91.9% for Xception, 55% for VGG19, 83.47% for NASNetMobile, 89.05% for EfficientNetV2M, 87.38% for ResNet152V2, 92.4% for Hybrid of Inception-v3 & Xception, and 89.00% for Hybrid of EfficientNetV2M, NASNetMobile, Inception & Xception. Among these algorithms, the Hybrid of Inception-v3 & Xception gives the highest accuracy of 92.4%.
引用
收藏
页码:77228 / 77239
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Peanut leaf disease identification with deep learning algorithms
    Xu, Laixiang
    Cao, Bingxu
    Ning, Shiyuan
    Zhang, Wenbo
    Zhao, Fengjie
    MOLECULAR BREEDING, 2023, 43 (04)
  • [42] Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms for Assessing Agricultural Product Quality Using NIRS
    Ren, Jiwen
    Xiong, Yuming
    Chen, Xinyu
    Hao, Yong
    SENSORS, 2024, 24 (16)
  • [43] Context-Based News Headlines Analysis: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms
    Hossain, Syeda Sumbul
    Arafat, Yeasir
    Hossain, Md Ekram
    VIETNAM JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2021, 08 (04) : 513 - 527
  • [44] Comparative analysis of radiomics and deep-learning algorithms for survival prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Felix Schön
    Aaron Kieslich
    Heiner Nebelung
    Carina Riediger
    Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
    Alex Zwanenburg
    Steffen Löck
    Jens-Peter Kühn
    Scientific Reports, 14
  • [45] Comparative analysis of radiomics and deep-learning algorithms for survival prediction in hepatocellular carcinoma
    Schoen, Felix
    Kieslich, Aaron
    Nebelung, Heiner
    Riediger, Carina
    Hoffmann, Ralf-Thorsten
    Zwanenburg, Alex
    Loeck, Steffen
    Kuehn, Jens-Peter
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [47] Enhancing Weld Inspection Through Comparative Analysis of Traditional Algorithms and Deep Learning Approaches
    Zhang, Baoxin
    Wang, Xiaopeng
    Cui, Jinhan
    Wu, Juntao
    Xiong, Zhi
    Zhang, Wenpin
    Yu, Xinghua
    JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, 2024, 43 (02)
  • [48] A hybrid resampling algorithms SMOTE and ENN based deep learning models for identification of Marburg virus inhibitors
    Kumari, Madhulata
    Subbarao, Naidu
    FUTURE MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 14 (10) : 701 - 715
  • [49] Deep learning algorithms for delaminations identification on composite panels by wave propagation signal analysis
    Monaco, E.
    Ricci, F.
    Boffa, N. D.
    HEALTH MONITORING OF STRUCTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS XVII, 2023, 12488
  • [50] Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for identification of BOT attack on the Internet of Vehicles (IoV)
    Aswal, Kiran
    Dobhal, Dinesh C.
    Pathak, Heman
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INVENTIVE COMPUTATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICICT-2020), 2020, : 312 - 317