Hybrid Deep Learning Algorithms for Dog Breed Identification-A Comparative Analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Valarmathi, B. [1 ]
Gupta, N. Srinivasa [2 ]
Prakash, G. [3 ]
Reddy, R. Hemadri [4 ]
Saravanan, S. [5 ]
Shanmugasundaram, P. [6 ]
机构
[1] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Informat Technol & Engn, Dept Software & Syst Engn, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Mech Engn, Dept Mfg Engn, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Dept Database Syst, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
[4] Vellore Inst Technol, Sch Adv Sci, Dept Math, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
[5] SASTRA, Srinivasa Ramanujan Ctr, Dept Elect & Commun Engn, Kumbakonam 612001, Tamil Nadu, India
[6] Mizan Tepi Univ, Coll Nat & Computat Sci, Dept Math, Mizan Teferi 5140, Ethiopia
关键词
EfficientNetV2M; hybrid of EfficientNetV2M; hybrid of inception and Xception; NasNet-Mobile; ResNet152V2; VGG19; Xception;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3297440
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Deep learning and computer vision algorithms will be applied to find the breed of the dog from an image. The goal is to have the user submit an image of a dog, and the model will choose one of the 120 breeds stated in the dataset to determine the dog's breed. The proposed work uses various deep learning algorithms like Xception, VGG19, NASNetMobile, EfficientNetV2M, ResNet152V2, Hybrid of Inception & Xception, and Hybrid of EfficientNetV2M, NASNetMobile, Inception & Xception to predict dog breeds. ResNet101, ResNet50, InceptionResNetV2, and Inception-v3 on the Stanford Dogs Standard Datasetswere used in the existing system. The proposed models are considered a hybrid of Inception-v3 & Xception and a hybrid of EfficientNetV2M, NASNetMobile, Inception & Xception. This hybrid model outperforms single models like Xception, VGG19, InceptionV3, ResNet50, and ResNet101.The authors used a transfer learning algorithm with data augmentation to increase their accuracy and achieved a validation accuracy score of 71.63% for ResNet101, 63.78% for ResNet50, 40.72% for InceptionResNetV2, and 34.84% for InceptionV3. This paper compares the proposed algorithms with existing ones like ResNet101, ResNet50, InceptionResNetV2, and InceptionV3. In the existing system, ResNet101 gave the highest accuracy of 71.63%. The proposed algorithms give a validation accuracy score of 91.9% for Xception, 55% for VGG19, 83.47% for NASNetMobile, 89.05% for EfficientNetV2M, 87.38% for ResNet152V2, 92.4% for Hybrid of Inception-v3 & Xception, and 89.00% for Hybrid of EfficientNetV2M, NASNetMobile, Inception & Xception. Among these algorithms, the Hybrid of Inception-v3 & Xception gives the highest accuracy of 92.4%.
引用
收藏
页码:77228 / 77239
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hybrid Deep Learning Approach for Enhanced Animal Breed Classification and Prediction
    Khan, Safdar Sardar
    Doohan, Nitika Vats
    Gupta, Manish
    Jaffari, Sakina
    Chourasia, Ankita
    Joshi, Kriti
    Panchal, Bhupendra
    TRAITEMENT DU SIGNAL, 2023, 40 (05) : 2087 - 2099
  • [22] Comparative analysis of Deep Learning and Machine Learning algorithms for emoji prediction from Arabic text
    Mokhamed, Takua
    Harous, Saad
    Hussein, Nada
    Ismail, Heba
    SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS AND MINING, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [23] Comparative study and analysis on skin cancer detection using machine learning and deep learning algorithms
    V. Auxilia Osvin Nancy
    P. Prabhavathy
    Meenakshi S. Arya
    B. Shamreen Ahamed
    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2023, 82 : 45913 - 45957
  • [24] Comparative study and analysis on skin cancer detection using machine learning and deep learning algorithms
    Nancy, V. Auxilia Osvin
    Prabhavathy, P.
    Arya, Meenakshi S.
    Ahamed, B. Shamreen
    MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2023, 82 (29) : 45913 - 45957
  • [25] A comparative analysis of star identification algorithms
    Alireza Toloei
    Mona Zahednamazi
    Reza Ghasemi
    Fazel Mohammadi
    Astrophysics and Space Science, 2020, 365
  • [26] A comparative analysis of star identification algorithms
    Toloei, Alireza
    Zahednamazi, Mona
    Ghasemi, Reza
    Mohammadi, Fazel
    ASTROPHYSICS AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2020, 365 (04)
  • [27] Deep Learning Models for Potato Leaf Disease Identification: A Comparative Analysis
    Vadivel, Balasubramaniam
    Thangaraj, Rajasekaran
    Pandiyan, P.
    Aravind, T.
    Harish, K.
    Sivaraman, E.
    2022 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREEN ENERGY, COMPUTING AND SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGY (GECOST), 2022, : 58 - 62
  • [28] Comparative analysis of deep learning classifiers for diabetic retinopathy identification and detection
    Rayavel, P.
    Murukesh, C.
    IMAGING SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2022, 70 (06): : 358 - 370
  • [29] Comparative Study on Three Autoencoder-Based Deep Learning Algorithms for Geochemical Anomaly Identification
    Feng, Bin
    Chen, Lirong
    Xu, Yongyang
    Zhang, Yu
    EARTH AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2022, 9 (11)
  • [30] Comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms for Lip print based person identification
    S. Sandhya
    Roshan Fernandes
    S. Sapna
    Anisha P. Rodrigues
    Evolutionary Intelligence, 2022, 15 : 743 - 757