In Dubio Pro Tributario/In Dubio Mitius as a Rule of Reasoning in Tax Law Interpretation

被引:0
作者
Morawski, Wojciech [1 ]
Bohac, Radim [2 ]
机构
[1] Nicolaus Copernicus Univ Torun, Fac Law & Adm, Dept Publ Finance Law, Torun, Poland
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Dept Financial Law & Financial Sci, Fac Law, Prague, Czech Republic
来源
INTERTAX | 2023年 / 51卷 / 6-7期
关键词
Interpretation; in dubio pro tributario; in dubio mitius; tax law; tax avoidance; EU law;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The article is devoted to the principle of in dubio pro tributario (the principle of resolving doubts in favour of the taxpayer) as a rule of legal reasoning. The article points out its following two aspects: (1) the evidential aspect whereby it is concerned with resolving uncertainties regarding the proof of facts that are relevant to the determination of the amount of tax and (2) the interpretative aspect whereby it is used to resolve doubts related to the ambiguity of a legal regulation. The article focuses on the second aspect. The authors present how various legal systems have developed different ways of understanding this principle. They point out that it is not a universally applied principle in tax law and that it has been rejected in the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 518
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1969, Judgment concerning the constitutionality of Kyoto City Ordinance No. 10 of 1954 on Assembly, Marching
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, JUDGMENT CONSTITUTIO
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, HERST S R O ODVOLACI
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, JUDGMENT COURT 19 DE
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2018, Zwiazek Gmin Zaglebia Miedziowego w Polkowicach v. Szef Krajowej Administracji Skarbowej
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2017, Judgment of the Constitutional Court of the Slovak Republic I.US155/2017 of 31.
  • [7] [Anonymous], OPINION ADVOCATE GEN
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2021, JUDGMENT SUPREME ADM
  • [9] [Anonymous], 1998, JUDGMENT SUPREME ADM
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2007, JUDGMENT CONSTITUTIO