Efficacy of a Technology-Based Early Language Comprehension Intervention: A Randomized Control Trial

被引:6
作者
McMaster, Kristen L. [1 ,2 ]
Kendeou, Panayiota [1 ]
Kim, Jasmine [1 ]
Butterfuss, Reese [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Dept Educ Psychol, 56 East River Rd, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
inference; educational technology; reading comprehension; response to intervention; EARLY LITERACY INTERVENTION; READING-COMPREHENSION; INFERENTIAL COMPREHENSION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONS; YOUNG-CHILDREN; IDENTIFICATION; INSTRUCTION; GENERATION; STUDENTS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1177/00222194231182974
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
We examined the efficacy of a Technology-Based Early Language Comprehension Intervention (TeLCI) designed to teach inferencing in a non-reading context. First- and second graders identified as at risk of comprehension difficulties were assigned randomly to a business-as-usual control group or to use TeLCI over an 8-week period. TeLCI comprised three learning modules per week that involved (a) learning new vocabulary, (b) watching fiction or nonfiction videos, and (c) answering inferential questions. Students also engaged in small-group read-alouds with their teachers once per week. Students who experienced TeLCI improved their inferencing and benefited from scaffolding and feedback provided during the intervention. Students' pre- to posttest inferencing gains were comparable with those of control students. Female students and those receiving special education services appeared less likely to benefit from TeLCI, whereas multilingual students were more likely to respond. Further work is needed to determine the optimal conditions under which TeLCI will benefit young children.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 152
页数:14
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention - A review of the literature [J].
Al Otaiba, S ;
Fuchs, D .
REMEDIAL AND SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2002, 23 (05) :300-316
[2]   Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective? An experimental and longitudinal study [J].
Al Otaiba, Stephanie ;
Fuchs, Douglas .
JOURNAL OF LEARNING DISABILITIES, 2006, 39 (05) :414-431
[3]   What We Know and Need to Know about Literacy Interventions for Elementary Students with Reading Difficulties and Disabilities, including Dyslexia [J].
Al Otaiba, Stephanie ;
McMaster, Kristen ;
Wanzek, Jeanne ;
Zaru, Mai W. .
READING RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2023, 58 (02) :313-332
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, COMM COR STAT STAND
[5]   Evaluating the Impact of a Multistrategy Inference Intervention for Middle-Grade Struggling Readers [J].
Barth, Amy E. ;
Elleman, Amy .
LANGUAGE SPEECH AND HEARING SERVICES IN SCHOOLS, 2017, 48 (01) :31-41
[6]  
Burns M K., 2016, Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of multi-tiered systems of support, V2nd, P719, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_41, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_41]
[7]   The Role of Executive Functions in Reading Comprehension [J].
Butterfuss, Reese ;
Kendeou, Panayiota .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2018, 30 (03) :801-826
[8]   Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children [J].
Cain, K ;
Oakhill, JV .
READING AND WRITING, 1999, 11 (5-6) :489-503
[9]   Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties [J].
Cain, Kate ;
Oakhill, Jane .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 76 :683-696
[10]  
Calkins T. C. R. W. P., UNITS STUDY TEACHING