Use of Machine Learning and Lay Care Coaches to Increase Advance Care Planning Conversations for Patients With Metastatic Cancer

被引：11

作者：

Gensheimer, Michael F. ^{[1
]}

Gupta, Divya ^{[1
]}

Patel, Manali I. ^{[1
,2
]}

Fardeen, Touran ^{[1
]}

Hildebrand, Rachel ^{[1
]}

Teuteberg, Winifred ^{[1
]}

Seevaratnam, Briththa ^{[1
]}

Asuncion, Mary Khay ^{[1
]}

Alves, Nina ^{[1
]}

Rogers, Brian ^{[1
]}

Hansen, Jennifer ^{[1
]}

DeNofrio, Jan ^{[1
]}

Shah, Nigam H. ^{[1
]}

Parikh, Divya ^{[1
]}

Neal, Joel ^{[1
]}

Fan, Alice C. ^{[1
]}

Moore, Kaidi ^{[1
]}

Ruiz, Shann ^{[1
]}

Li, Connie ^{[1
]}

Khaki, Ali Raza ^{[1
]}

Pagtama, Judy ^{[1
]}

Chien, Joanne ^{[1
]}

Brown, Tiffany ^{[1
]}

Tisch, Alison Holmes ^{[1
]}

Das, Millie ^{[1
]}

Srinivas, Sandhya ^{[1
]}

Roy, Mohana ^{[1
]}

Wakelee, Heather ^{[1
]}

Myall, Nathaniel J. ^{[1
]}

Huang, Jane ^{[1
]}

Shah, Sumit ^{[1
]}

Lee, Howard ^{[1
]}

Ramchandran, Kavitha ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA

[2] VA Palo Alto Hlth Care Syst, Palo Alto, CA USA

来源：

JCO ONCOLOGY PRACTICE | 2023年 / 19卷 / 02期

关键词：

PALLIATIVE CARE; END; LIFE; AGGRESSIVENESS; IMPLEMENTATION; ADULTS;

D O I：

10.1200/OP.22.00128

中图分类号：

R73 [肿瘤学];

学科分类号：

100214 ;

摘要：

PURPOSE:Patients with metastatic cancer benefit from advance care planning (ACP) conversations. We aimed to improve ACP using a computer model to select high-risk patients, with shorter predicted survival, for conversations with providers and lay care coaches. Outcomes included ACP documentation frequency and end-of-life quality measures.METHODS:In this study of a quality improvement initiative, providers in four medical oncology clinics received Serious Illness Care Program training. Two clinics (thoracic/genitourinary) participated in an intervention, and two (cutaneous/sarcoma) served as controls. ACP conversations were documented in a centralized form in the electronic medical record. In the intervention, providers and care coaches received weekly e-mails highlighting upcoming clinic patients with < 2 year computer-predicted survival and no prior prognosis documentation. Care coaches contacted these patients for an ACP conversation (excluding prognosis). Providers were asked to discuss and document prognosis.RESULTS:In the four clinics, 4,968 clinic visits by 1,251 patients met inclusion criteria (metastatic cancer with no prognosis previously documented). In their first visit, 28% of patients were high-risk (< 2 year predicted survival). Preintervention, 3% of both intervention and control clinic patients had ACP documentation during a visit. By intervention end (February 2021), 35% of intervention clinic patients had ACP documentation compared with 3% of control clinic patients. Providers' prognosis documentation rate also increased in intervention clinics after the intervention (2%-27% in intervention clinics, P < .0001; 0%-1% in control clinics). End-of-life care intensity was similar in intervention versus control clinics, but patients with >= 1 provider ACP edit met fewer high-intensity care measures (P = .04).CONCLUSION:Combining a computer prognosis model with care coaches increased ACP documentation.

引用

页码：87 / +

页数：10

共 50 条

[31] Development of a Standardized Simulation Advance Care Planning Conversations for Nurses
de Campos, Amisha Parekh
Polifroni, E. Carol
[J]. NURSING RESEARCH, 2023, 72 (01) : 74 - 80
[32] Advance care planning for people with dementia: Ordinary everyday conversations
de Vries, Kay
Drury-Ruddlesden, Jenny
[J]. DEMENTIA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2019, 18 (7-8): : 3023 - 3035
[33] Re: A Reflective Case Study in Family Medicine Advance Care Planning Conversations
de Caprariis, Pascal J.
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (04) : 639 - 639
[34] Advance care planning conversations with palliative patients: looking through the GP's eyes
Wichmann, Anne B.
van Dam, Hanna
Thoonsen, Bregje
Boer, Theo A.
Engels, Yvonne
Groenewoud, A. Stef
[J]. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 19
[35] Advance care planning conversations in home care: Intervention development with the Behaviour Change Wheel
Kirchner, Aenne
Langner, Henriette
Meyer, Gabriele
Schnakenberg, Rieke
Silies, Katharina
Hoffmann, Falk
Koepke, Sascha
Koeberlein-Neu, Juliane
Berg, Almuth
[J]. PFLEGE, 2022, 35 (06): : 345 - 354
[36] Understanding how cancer patients actualise, relinquish, and reject advance care planning: implications for practice
Michael, Natasha
O'Callaghan, Clare
Clayton, Josephine
Pollard, Annabel
Stepanov, Nikola
Spruyt, Odette
Michael, Michael
Ball, David
[J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2013, 21 (08) : 2195 - 2205
[37] Palliative Care Service Utilization and Advance Care Planning for Adult Glioblastoma Patients: A Systematic Review
Wu, Adela
Colon, Gabriela Ruiz
Aslakson, Rebecca
Pollom, Erqi
Patel, Chirag B.
[J]. CANCERS, 2021, 13 (12)
[38] Cancer patients spend more time at home and more often die at home with advance care planning conversations in primary health care: a retrospective observational cohort study
Driller, Bardo
Talseth-Palmer, Bente
Hole, Torstein
Stromskag, Kjell Erik
Brenne, Anne-Tove
[J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2022, 21 (01)
[39] Factors influencing the engagement of cancer patients with advance care planning: A scoping review
Spelten, Evelien R.
Geerse, Olaf
van Vuuren, Julia
Timmis, Jennifer
Blanch, Bev
Duijts, Saskia
MacDermott, Sean
[J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2019, 28 (03)
[40] Hope and advance care planning in advanced cancer: Is there a relationship?
Cohen, Michael G.
Althouse, Andrew D.
Arnold, Robert M.
Bulls, Hailey W.
White, Douglas B.
Chu, Edward
Rosenzweig, Margaret Q.
Smith, Kenneth J.
Schenker, Yael
[J]. CANCER, 2022, 128 (06) : 1339 - 1345

← 1 2 3 4 5 →