Validation of a Tamil Version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Using Rasch Analysis

被引:1
作者
Raman, Kalpana [1 ,3 ]
Siegert, Richard J. [1 ]
Bharatharaj, Jaishankar [2 ]
Krageloh, Christian U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Auckland Univ Technol, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Bharath Inst Higher Educ & Res, PAIR Lab India, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Auckland Univ Technol, 90 Akoranga Dr, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
Mindfulness; FFMQ; Tamil version; Rasch analysis; psychometrics; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; COMPREHENSIVE INVENTORY; KENTUCKY INVENTORY; SELF-REPORT; VALIDITY; FFMQ; CONSTRUCTION; DEPRESSION; PRECISION; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.1177/02537176231220564
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Various assessment tools that explore and assess mindfulness are available. Keeping in view both the origin of and the literature surrounding mindfulness assessment tools, this study aimed to evaluate the workability of one widely researched tool, the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), for establishing cross-cultural generalizability and utility in the Indian context. Methods: We recruited 303 adults over 18 with proficiency in the Tamil language and no history of significant neurological trauma and/or psychiatric history. They completed a version of the 39-item FFMQ, which we had translated into Tamil (FFMQ-T). The psychometric properties of this scale were tested using the PartialCredit model of Rasch analysis. Results: Iterative Rasch analysis could not resolve consistent misfit of the Observe facet items. Using a subtest approach, a higher-order fit of the FFMQ-T could be achieved after the deletion of additional items from each of the remaining four facets. The resulting final model for the FFMQ-T questionnaire was a four-factor solution with 22 items. Conclusions: This study concluded the usability of the new 22-item FFMQ-T.These results are not dissimilar to the other versions in similar populations, such as the Hindi version of the FFMQ. The ordinal-to-interval conversion tables provided here ensure that the FFMQ-T can be used with enhanced precision and parametric statistics.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 158
页数:12
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Evaluating a short-form Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in adolescents: Evidence for a four-factor structure and invariance by time, age, and gender
    Abujaradeh, Hiba
    Colaianne, Blake A.
    Roeser, Robert W.
    Tsukayama, Eli
    Galla, Brian M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 44 (01) : 20 - 30
  • [2] Shyness, Self-Construal, Extraversion-Introversion, Neuroticism, and Psychoticism: A Cross-Cultural Comparison Among College Students
    Afshan, Ambreen
    Askari, Iman
    Manickam, Leister Sam Sudheer
    [J]. SAGE OPEN, 2015, 5 (02):
  • [3] Alizadeh Afrouzi O., 2021, J INT HUMANITARIAN A, V6, P1, DOI [10.1186/s41018-020-00088-y, DOI 10.1186/S41018-020-00088-Y]
  • [4] Two Sides of Emotion: Exploring Positivity and Negativity in Six Basic Emotions across Cultures
    An, Sieun
    Ji, Li-Jun
    Marks, Michael
    Zhang, Zhiyong
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [5] Anchorena M.N., 2017, Archives of Assessment Psychology, V7, P29
  • [6] Andrich D., 2009, RUMM 2030
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2011, Population Enumeration Data
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2004, Development, Factor Structure, and Initial Validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale
  • [9] Baer R., 2022, Handbook of Assessment in Mindfulness Research
  • [10] Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness
    Baer, RA
    Smith, GT
    Hopkins, J
    Krietemeyer, J
    Toney, L
    [J]. ASSESSMENT, 2006, 13 (01) : 27 - 45