Accuracy of Medical Student Measurements of CT Right-to-Left Ventricular Diameter in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism

Objectives: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disease, necessitating risk stratification to determine management. A right ventricle (RV) to left ventricle (LV) diameter ratio >= 1.0 on computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) suggests RV strain, which may indicate a worse prognosis. Two prior studies showed that residents with brief training by a radiologist could accurately measure RV/LV ratio. We assessed whether medical students could accurately measure RV dilatation. Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of a retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing management for acute PE at 21 community emergency departments across Kaiser Permanente Northern California from 2013 to 2015. We created a sample, stratified to contain an equal number of patients from each of the 5 PE Severity Index classes. Four medical students measured RV and LV diameter on CTPA after training from an emergency medicine physician and an interventional radiologist. We used Cohen's kappa statistics, Bland-Altman plots, and Pearson correlation coefficients to assess interrater reliability. Results: Of the 108 CTPAs reviewed, 79 (73%) showed RV dilatation and 29 (27%) did not. The kappa statistic for the presence of RV dilatation of the medical students compared to the radiologist showed moderate agreement for 3 medical students (kappa (95% CI): 0.46 (0.21-0.70), 0.49 (0.31-0.68), 0.50 (0.32-0.68)) and fair agreement for 1 medical student (kappa (95% CI): 0.29 (0.10-0.47)). The average interrater differences in RV/LV ratio between a radiologist and each of the 4 medical students were -0.04, -0.05, 0.04, and 0.24. Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.87, 0.80, 0.74, and 0.78, respectively, indicating moderate correlation (P < .001 for all). Conclusion: Medical students were able to identify RV dilatation on CTPA in moderate agreement with that of a radiologist. Further study is needed to determine whether medical student accuracy could improve with additional training.