Neonatal near-miss audits: a systematic review and a call to action

被引:1
作者
Medeiros, P. B. [1 ,2 ]
Bailey, C. [1 ]
Pollock, D. [3 ]
Liley, H. [4 ]
Gordon, A. [1 ,5 ]
Andrews, C. [1 ]
Flenady, V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Mater Res Inst, Ctr Res Excellence Stillbirth, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] Sunshine Coast Univ Hosp, Sunshine Coast, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Publ Hlth, JBI, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Fac Med, Mater Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Audit; Neonatal near miss; Perinatal morbidity; Perinatal mortality; PERINATAL MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; CRITERIA; INCOME;
D O I
10.1186/s12887-023-04383-6
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
BackgroundNeonatal near-miss (NNM) can be considered as an end of a spectrum that includes stillbirths and neonatal deaths. Clinical audits of NNM might reduce perinatal adverse outcomes. The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness of NNM audits for reducing perinatal mortality and morbidity and explore related contextual factors.MethodsPubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, LILACS and SciELO were searched in February/2023. Randomized and observational studies of NNM clinical audits were included without restrictions on setting, publication date or language. Primary outcomes: perinatal mortality, morbidity and NNM. Secondary outcomes: factors contributing to NNM and measures of quality of care. Study characteristics, methodological quality and outcome were extracted and assessed by two independent reviewers. Narrative synthesis was performed.ResultsOf 3081 titles and abstracts screened, 36 articles had full-text review. Two studies identified, rated, and classified contributing care factors and generated recommendations to improve the quality of care. No study reported the primary outcomes for the review (change in perinatal mortality, morbidity and NNM rates resulting from an audit process), thus precluding meta-analysis. Three studies were multidisciplinary NNM audits and were assessed for additional contextual factors.ConclusionThere was little data available to determine the effectiveness of clinical audits of NNM. While trials randomised at patient level to test our research question would be difficult or unethical for both NNM and perinatal death audits, other strategies such as large, well-designed before-and-after studies within services or comparisons between services could contribute evidence. This review supports a Call to Action for NNM audits. Adoption of formal audit methodology, standardised NNM definitions, evaluation of parent's engagement and measurement of the effectiveness of quality improvement cycles for improving outcomes are needed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neonatal near-miss audits: a systematic review and a call to action
    P.B. Medeiros
    C. Bailey
    D. Pollock
    H. Liley
    A. Gordon
    C. Andrews
    V. Flenady
    BMC Pediatrics, 23
  • [2] Effectiveness of neonatal "near miss" audits in reducing perinatal morbidity and mortality: a systematic review protocol
    Medeiros, Poliana
    Bailey, Cheryl
    Andrews, Christine
    Liley, Helen
    Pollock, Danielle
    Gordon, Adrienne
    Flenady, Vicki
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (03) : 847 - 853
  • [3] Current approach and attitudes toward neonatal near-miss and perinatal audits: An exploratory international survey
    de Barros Medeiros, Poliana
    Liley, Helen
    Andrews, Christine
    Gordon, Adrienne
    Heazell, Alexander E. P.
    Kent, Alison L.
    Leisher, Susannah H.
    Flenady, Vicki
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 63 (03) : 352 - 359
  • [4] Neonatal near miss: a systematic review
    Santos, Juliana P.
    Pileggi-Castro, Cynthia
    Camelo, Jose S., Jr.
    Silva, Antonio A.
    Duran, Pablo
    Serruya, Suzanne J.
    Cecatti, Jose G.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2015, 15
  • [5] Maternal near-miss audits to improve quality of care
    Tuncalp, Oe.
    Souza, J. P.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 : 102 - 104
  • [6] Neonatal near miss: a systematic review
    Juliana P. Santos
    Cynthia Pileggi-Castro
    Jose S. Camelo
    Antonio A. Silva
    Pablo Duran
    Suzanne J. Serruya
    Jose G. Cecatti
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15
  • [7] Valid and reliable neonatal near-miss assessment scale in Ethiopia: a psychometric validation
    Asaye, Mengstu Melkamu
    Gelaye, Kassahun Alemu
    Matebe, Yohannes Hailu
    Lindgren, Helena
    Erlandsson, Kerstin
    GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [8] The evolution of the criteria for identifying the new concept of ?Neonatal Near Miss?: a systematic review
    Chafik, Kawtar
    Barich, Fatima
    Aslaou, Fatima
    Laamiri, Fatima Zahra
    Barkat, Amina
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2023, 65 (02) : 181 - 193
  • [9] Developing a framework to review near-miss maternal morbidity in India: a structured review and key stakeholder analysis
    Bhattacharyya, Sanghita
    Srivastava, Aradhana
    Knight, Marian
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2014, 14
  • [10] Survival and negotiation: narratives of severe (near-miss) neonatal complications of Syrian women in Lebanon
    Wick, Livia
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2017, 25 : S27 - S34