Radiologists' performance in reading digital breast tomosynthesis with and without synthesized views for cancer detection

被引:0
作者
Trieu, Phuong Dung [1 ]
Noakes, Jennie [1 ,2 ]
Li, Tong [1 ]
Borecky, Natacha [1 ,3 ]
Brennan, Patrick C. [1 ]
Barron, Melissa L. [1 ]
Lewis, Sarah J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Discipline Med Imaging Sci, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[2] BreastScreen New South Wales, Level 6,Community Serv Bldg,Herbert St, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[3] BreastScreen New South Wales North Coast, POB 1098, Lismore, NSW, Australia
关键词
RECONSTRUCTED PROJECTION IMAGES; MAMMOGRAPHY; POPULATION; DBT;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20220704
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: The study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of radiologists and radiology trainees in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) alone vs DBT plus synthe-sized view (SV) for an understanding of the adequacy of DBT images to identify cancer lesions.Methods: Fifty -five observers (30 radiologists and 25 radiology trainees) participated in reading a set of 35 cases (15 cancer) with 28 readers reading DBT and 27 readers reading DBT plus SV. Two groups of readers had similar experience in interpreting mammograms. The performances of participants in each reading mode were compared with the ground truth and calculated in term of specificity, sensitivity, and ROC AUC. The cancer detection rate in various levels of breast density, lesion types and lesion sizes between 'DBT' and 'DBT + SV' were also analyzed. The difference in diagnostic accuracy of readers between two reading modes was assessed using Man-Whitney U test. p < 0.05 indicated a significant result.Results: There was no significant difference in specificity (0.67-vs-0.65; p = 0.69), sensitivity (0.77-vs-0.71; p = 0.09), ROC AUC (0.77-vs-0.73; p = 0.19) of radiologists reading DBT plus SV compared with radiologists reading DBT. Similar result was found in radiology trainees with no significant difference in specificity (0.70-vs-0.63; p = 0.29), sensitivity (0.44-vs-0.55; p = 0.19), ROC AUC (0.59-vs-0.62; p = 0.60) between two reading modes. Radiologists and trainees obtained similar results in two reading modes for cancer detection rate with different levels of breast density, cancer types and sizes of lesions (p > 0.05).Conclusion: Findings show that the diagnostic perfor-mances of radiologists and radiology trainees in DBT alone and DBT plus SV were equivalent in identifying cancer and normal cases. Advances in knowledge: DBT alone had equivalent diag-nostic accuracy as DBT plus SV which could imply the consideration of using DBT as a sole modality without SV.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Breast cancer screening in women with and without implants: retrospective study comparing digital mammography to digital mammography combined with digital breast tomosynthesis
    Cohen, Ethan O.
    Perry, Rachel E.
    Tso, Hilda H.
    Phalak, Kanchan A.
    Lesslie, Michele D.
    Gerlach, Karen E.
    Sun, Jia
    Srinivasan, Ashmitha
    Leung, Jessica W. T.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (12) : 9499 - 9510
  • [42] Screening the Implant-Augmented Breast with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Is Tomosynthesis Necessary for Non-implant-Displaced Views?
    Nguyen, Derek L.
    Grimm, Lars J.
    Nelson, Jeffrey S.
    Johnson, Karen S.
    Ghate, Sujata, V
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2024, 6 (03) : 261 - 270
  • [43] Comparison of synthetic and digital mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis or alone for the detection and classification of microcalcifications
    Choi, Ji Soo
    Han, Boo-Kyung
    Ko, Eun Young
    Kim, Ga Ram
    Ko, Eun Sook
    Park, Ko Woon
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 319 - 329
  • [44] Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection among Women with a History of Breast Cancer
    Kim, Mi Young
    Suh, Young Jin
    An, Yeong Yi
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 29 (10) : 1458 - 1465
  • [45] Digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer screening: an ethical perspective
    Rosenqvist, Simon
    Brannmark, Johan
    Dustler, Magnus
    INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING, 2024, 15 (01):
  • [46] COMPARISON BETWEEN DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY AND DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF BREAST CANCER
    Jari, Irina
    Naum, A. G.
    Gheorghe, Liliana
    Negru, D.
    Ursaru, Manuela
    MEDICAL-SURGICAL JOURNAL-REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALA, 2019, 123 (01): : 102 - 108
  • [47] The TOMMY trial: a comparison of TOMosynthesis with digital MammographY in the UK NHS Breast Screening Programme a multicentre retrospective reading study comparing the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography with digital mammography alone
    Gilbert, Fiona J.
    Tucker, Lorraine
    Gillan, Maureen G. C.
    Willsher, Paula
    Cooke, Julie
    Duncan, Karen A.
    Michell, Michael J.
    Dobson, Hilary M.
    Lim, Yit Yoong
    Purushothaman, Hema
    Strudley, Celia
    Astley, Susan M.
    Morrish, Oliver
    Young, Kenneth C.
    Duffy, Stephen W.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2015, 19 (04) : 1 - +
  • [48] A prospective study comparing digital breast tomosynthesis with digital mammography in surveillance after breast cancer treatment
    Sia, Joseph
    Moodie, Kate
    Bressel, Mathias
    Lau, Eddie
    Gyorki, David
    Skandarajah, Anita
    Chua, Boon
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 61 : 122 - 127
  • [49] Developing Asymmetries without Sonographic Correlate at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Liang, Angela
    Baraban, Ezra
    Myers, Kelly S.
    Mullen, Lisa A.
    Panigrahi, Babita
    Oluyemi, Eniola
    Cimino-Mathews, Ashley
    Ambinder, Emily B.
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 302 (03) : 525 - 532
  • [50] Fast microcalcification detection on digital breast tomosynthesis datasets
    Bernard, S.
    Muller, S.
    Peters, G.
    Iordache, R.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2007: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2007, 6514