Radiologists' performance in reading digital breast tomosynthesis with and without synthesized views for cancer detection

被引:0
|
作者
Trieu, Phuong Dung [1 ]
Noakes, Jennie [1 ,2 ]
Li, Tong [1 ]
Borecky, Natacha [1 ,3 ]
Brennan, Patrick C. [1 ]
Barron, Melissa L. [1 ]
Lewis, Sarah J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Discipline Med Imaging Sci, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[2] BreastScreen New South Wales, Level 6,Community Serv Bldg,Herbert St, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[3] BreastScreen New South Wales North Coast, POB 1098, Lismore, NSW, Australia
关键词
RECONSTRUCTED PROJECTION IMAGES; MAMMOGRAPHY; POPULATION; DBT;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20220704
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: The study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of radiologists and radiology trainees in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) alone vs DBT plus synthe-sized view (SV) for an understanding of the adequacy of DBT images to identify cancer lesions.Methods: Fifty -five observers (30 radiologists and 25 radiology trainees) participated in reading a set of 35 cases (15 cancer) with 28 readers reading DBT and 27 readers reading DBT plus SV. Two groups of readers had similar experience in interpreting mammograms. The performances of participants in each reading mode were compared with the ground truth and calculated in term of specificity, sensitivity, and ROC AUC. The cancer detection rate in various levels of breast density, lesion types and lesion sizes between 'DBT' and 'DBT + SV' were also analyzed. The difference in diagnostic accuracy of readers between two reading modes was assessed using Man-Whitney U test. p < 0.05 indicated a significant result.Results: There was no significant difference in specificity (0.67-vs-0.65; p = 0.69), sensitivity (0.77-vs-0.71; p = 0.09), ROC AUC (0.77-vs-0.73; p = 0.19) of radiologists reading DBT plus SV compared with radiologists reading DBT. Similar result was found in radiology trainees with no significant difference in specificity (0.70-vs-0.63; p = 0.29), sensitivity (0.44-vs-0.55; p = 0.19), ROC AUC (0.59-vs-0.62; p = 0.60) between two reading modes. Radiologists and trainees obtained similar results in two reading modes for cancer detection rate with different levels of breast density, cancer types and sizes of lesions (p > 0.05).Conclusion: Findings show that the diagnostic perfor-mances of radiologists and radiology trainees in DBT alone and DBT plus SV were equivalent in identifying cancer and normal cases. Advances in knowledge: DBT alone had equivalent diag-nostic accuracy as DBT plus SV which could imply the consideration of using DBT as a sole modality without SV.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis
    Skaane, Per
    BREAST CANCER, 2017, 24 (01) : 32 - 41
  • [22] Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion
    Dibble, Elizabeth H.
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Ward, Robert C.
    Maynard, A. Stanley
    Mainiero, Martha B.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [23] Multichannel response analysis on 2D projection views for detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis
    Wei, Jun
    Chan, Heang-Ping
    Hadjiiski, Lubomir M.
    Helvie, Mark A.
    Lu, Yao
    Zhou, Chuan
    Samala, Ravi
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (04)
  • [24] Performance evaluation of digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound in the detection of breast cancer using pathology as gold standard: an institutional experience
    Pranjali Joshi
    Neha Singh
    Gaurav Raj
    Ragini Singh
    Kiran Preet Malhotra
    Namrata Punit Awasthi
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 53
  • [25] Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice
    Freer, Phoebe E.
    Riegert, Joanna
    Eisenmenger, Laura
    Ose, Dominik
    Winkler, Nicole
    Stein, Matthew A.
    Stoddard, Gregory J.
    Hess, Rachel
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 166 (02) : 501 - 509
  • [26] Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: State of the art
    Sechopoulos, Ioannis
    Teuwen, Jonas
    Mann, Ritse
    SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY, 2021, 72 : 214 - 225
  • [27] Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Improves Early Breast Cancer Detection and Survival in Taiwan
    Wu, Pei-Shan
    Hong, Yu-Ting
    Shen, Chiao-Hsuan
    Lee, Chao-Hsien
    Chou, Chen-Pin
    JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2024, 6 (06) : 601 - 609
  • [28] A comparison of Australian and USA radiologists' performance in detection of breast cancer
    Suleiman, Wasfi I.
    Georgian-Smith, Dianne
    Evanoff, Michael G.
    Lewis, Sarah
    McEntee, Mark F.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2014: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2014, 9037
  • [29] Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of different reading strategies implementing artificial intelligence
    Victor Dahlblom
    Magnus Dustler
    Anders Tingberg
    Sophia Zackrisson
    European Radiology, 2023, 33 : 3754 - 3765
  • [30] Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of different reading strategies implementing artificial intelligence
    Dahlblom, Victor
    Dustler, Magnus
    Tingberg, Anders
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2023, 33 (05) : 3754 - 3765