Effects of meteorological forcing uncertainty on high-resolution snow modeling and streamflow prediction in a mountainous karst watershed

被引:6
作者
Tyson, Conor [1 ,2 ]
Longyang, Qianqiu [3 ]
Neilson, Bethany T. [1 ]
Zeng, Ruijie [3 ]
Xu, Tianfang [3 ]
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Utah Water Res Lab, Logan, UT USA
[2] Jordan Valley Water Conservancy Dist, W Jordan, UT USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Snow hydrology; Karst; Rainfall-runoff modeling; Deep learning; Downscaling; Meteorological uncertainty; GRIDDED CLIMATE DATA; PRECIPITATION; TEMPERATURE; SENSITIVITY; HYDROLOGY; COVER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129304
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In the mountainous Western U.S., a considerable portion of water supply originates as snowmelt passing through karst watersheds. Accurately simulating streamflow in snow-dominated, karst basins is important for water re-sources management. However, this has been challenging due to high spatiotemporal variability of meteoro-logical and hydrogeological processes in these watersheds and scarcity of climate stations. To overcome these challenges, a physically based snow model is used to simulate snow processes at 100 m resolution, and the calculated snowmelt and potential evapotranspiration rates are fed into a deep learning model to simulate streamflow. The snow model was driven by meteorological variables from a regional scale Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model or from the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS-2). The two datasets were used both at the original resolution and downscaled to 100 m resolution based on orographic adjustments, leading to four sets of forcings. Snow model simulation results from the four sets of forcings showed large differences in simulated snow water equivalent (SWE) and snowmelt rate and timing. However, the dif-ferences were damped in simulated streamflow, as the deep learning model is partially immune to input bias and picked up different streamflow responses to snowmelt and rainfall when trained using snow model results. While the meteorological datasets considered yielded close streamflow simulation accuracy, averaging simulated streamflow from the four sets of forcings consistently achieved better performance, suggesting the value of including multiple meteorological datasets for modeling streamflow in mountainous watersheds.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Implications of global climate change for snowmelt hydrology in the twenty-first century
    Adam, Jennifer C.
    Hamlet, Alan F.
    Lettenmaier, Dennis P.
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2009, 23 (07) : 962 - 972
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2016, MODIS TERRA SNOW COV
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2022, SNOwpack TELemetry Network (SNOTEL) (NRCS)
  • [4] Evaluation of downscaled, gridded climate data for the - conterminous United States
    Behnke, R.
    Vavrus, S.
    Allstadt, A.
    Albright, T.
    Thogmartin, W. E.
    Radeloff, V. C.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2016, 26 (05) : 1338 - 1351
  • [5] Representing spatial variability of snow water equivalent in hydrologic and land-surface models: A review
    Clark, Martyn P.
    Hendrikx, Jordy
    Slater, Andrew G.
    Kavetski, Dmitri
    Anderson, Brian
    Cullen, Nicolas J.
    Kerr, Tim
    Hreinsson, Einar Oern
    Woods, Ross A.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2011, 47
  • [6] Real-time and retrospective forcing in the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS) project
    Cosgrove, BA
    Lohmann, D
    Mitchell, KE
    Houser, PR
    Wood, EF
    Schaake, JC
    Robock, A
    Marshall, C
    Sheffield, J
    Duan, QY
    Luo, LF
    Higgins, RW
    Pinker, RT
    Tarpley, JD
    Meng, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D22)
  • [7] Modeling Percent Tree Canopy Cover: A Pilot Study
    Coulston, John W.
    Moisen, Gretchen G.
    Wilson, Barry T.
    Finco, Mark V.
    Cohen, Warren B.
    Brewer, C. Kenneth
    [J]. PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 78 (07) : 715 - 727
  • [8] Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States
    Daly, Christopher
    Halbleib, Michael
    Smith, Joseph I.
    Gibson, Wayne P.
    Doggett, Matthew K.
    Taylor, George H.
    Curtis, Jan
    Pasteris, Phillip P.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2008, 28 (15) : 2031 - 2064
  • [9] Uncertainty analysis of statistically downscaled temperature and precipitation regimes in Northern Canada
    Dibike, Y. B.
    Gachon, P.
    St-Hilaire, A.
    Ouarda, T. B. M. J.
    Nguyen, Van T. -V.
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2008, 91 (1-4) : 149 - 170
  • [10] How Does the Choice of Distributed Meteorological Data Affect Hydrologic Model Calibration and Streamflow Simulations?
    Elsner, Marketa M.
    Gangopadhyay, Subhrendu
    Pruitt, Tom
    Brekke, Levi D.
    Mizukami, Naoki
    Clark, Martyn P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROMETEOROLOGY, 2014, 15 (04) : 1384 - 1403