Effects of meteorological forcing uncertainty on high-resolution snow modeling and streamflow prediction in a mountainous karst watershed
被引:6
作者:
Tyson, Conor
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Utah Water Res Lab, Logan, UT USA
Jordan Valley Water Conservancy Dist, W Jordan, UT USAUtah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Utah Water Res Lab, Logan, UT USA
Tyson, Conor
[1
,2
]
Longyang, Qianqiu
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, Tempe, AZ 85281 USAUtah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Utah Water Res Lab, Logan, UT USA
Longyang, Qianqiu
[3
]
Neilson, Bethany T.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Utah Water Res Lab, Logan, UT USAUtah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Utah Water Res Lab, Logan, UT USA
Neilson, Bethany T.
[1
]
Zeng, Ruijie
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, Tempe, AZ 85281 USAUtah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Utah Water Res Lab, Logan, UT USA
Zeng, Ruijie
[3
]
Xu, Tianfang
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, Tempe, AZ 85281 USAUtah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Utah Water Res Lab, Logan, UT USA
Xu, Tianfang
[3
]
机构:
[1] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Utah Water Res Lab, Logan, UT USA
[2] Jordan Valley Water Conservancy Dist, W Jordan, UT USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainable Engn & Built Environm, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
In the mountainous Western U.S., a considerable portion of water supply originates as snowmelt passing through karst watersheds. Accurately simulating streamflow in snow-dominated, karst basins is important for water re-sources management. However, this has been challenging due to high spatiotemporal variability of meteoro-logical and hydrogeological processes in these watersheds and scarcity of climate stations. To overcome these challenges, a physically based snow model is used to simulate snow processes at 100 m resolution, and the calculated snowmelt and potential evapotranspiration rates are fed into a deep learning model to simulate streamflow. The snow model was driven by meteorological variables from a regional scale Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model or from the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS-2). The two datasets were used both at the original resolution and downscaled to 100 m resolution based on orographic adjustments, leading to four sets of forcings. Snow model simulation results from the four sets of forcings showed large differences in simulated snow water equivalent (SWE) and snowmelt rate and timing. However, the dif-ferences were damped in simulated streamflow, as the deep learning model is partially immune to input bias and picked up different streamflow responses to snowmelt and rainfall when trained using snow model results. While the meteorological datasets considered yielded close streamflow simulation accuracy, averaging simulated streamflow from the four sets of forcings consistently achieved better performance, suggesting the value of including multiple meteorological datasets for modeling streamflow in mountainous watersheds.