Experimental Investigation of the Size Effect of Rock under Impact Load

被引:7
作者
Zhou, Jun [1 ]
Zhao, Guangming [1 ,2 ]
Meng, Xiangrui [1 ]
Liu, Chonyan [1 ]
Ma, Longpei [1 ]
Xu, Wensong [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Xiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Deep Coal Mine Min Response & Disast, Huainan 232000, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Safety Sci & Engn, Huainan 232000, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
rock strength; size effect; strain rate; Weibull distribution; improved formula; STRAIN-RATE; STRENGTH; FRACTURE;
D O I
10.3390/min13010043
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
When measuring the compressive strength of rock, size and strain rate are the two main influencing factors. To study the rock strength size effect, rock specimens with length-to-diameter ratios of 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and 1 were subjected to static loading tests using the RMT rock mechanics test system and dynamic loading with the split Hopkinson pressure bar, respectively. Based on the Weibull size-effect formula, the experimental results were compared with the improved formula obtained. The results show that rock strength is influenced by size and strain rate. Both the dynamic increase factor and rock strength are proportional to strain rate. The different failure modes of rock with size variation and strain rate variation are described according to the failure process of the specimens. The same length-to-diameter ratio specimens produced more fragments with a strain rate increase. Under the same strain rate of impact, the larger the rock specimen, the finer the broken fragments. Considering the factor of strain rate in the Weibull size-effect formula, the calculated result is accurate. The improved size-effect formula could be used to better elaborate the potential mechanisms of dynamic rock strength. In the unified theoretical formula containing static and dynamic loads, the relationship of rock strength, size and strain rate is well described.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Bandis S.C., 1990, P 1 INT WORKSHOP SCA, P50
[2]   Scaling of quasi-brittle fracture and the fractal question [J].
Bazant, ZP .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1995, 117 (04) :361-367
[3]   SCALING LAWS AND RENORMALIZATION-GROUPS FOR STRENGTH AND TOUGHNESS OF DISORDERED MATERIALS [J].
CARPINTERI, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 1994, 31 (03) :291-302
[4]  
CEB, 1988, Concrete Structures Under Impact and Impulsive Loading, V187
[5]   Size effect on peak axial strain and stress-strain behavior of concrete subjected to axial compression [J].
Chen, Peng ;
Liu, Changyong ;
Wang, Yuyin .
CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2018, 188 :645-655
[6]   Compressive Strength of Concrete Cores under High Strain Rates [J].
Chen, Xudong ;
Wu, Shengxing ;
Zhou, Jikai .
JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2015, 29 (01)
[7]   Size effect for normal strength concrete cylinders subjected to axial impact [J].
Elfahal, MM ;
Krauthammer, T ;
Ohno, T ;
Beppu, M ;
Mindess, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING, 2005, 31 (04) :461-481
[8]  
Ganji M., 2016, J MATH SCI, V218, P269, DOI DOI 10.1007/S10958-016-3028-2
[9]  
[宫凤强 Gong Fengqiang], 2018, [岩石力学与工程学报, Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering], V37, P1586
[10]   CRITERIA FOR IMPULSIVE ROCK FRACTURE [J].
GRADY, DE ;
LIPKIN, J .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1980, 7 (04) :255-258