Pliable Logic as a Practice-Led Research Methodology for Textile Practice

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Tsai-Chun [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Sch Fash & Text, Design, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
TEXTILE-CLOTH AND CULTURE | 2024年 / 22卷 / 01期
关键词
pleats; pleating; pliable logic; textile thinking; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/14759756.2023.2167564
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In this paper, the researcher would like to propose a novel research methodology based on pleating action and how pleats are formulated, herein named "pliable logic." It provides a recursive and malleable production and thinking route that encourages researchers to seek meanings in between different phases of textile thinking and research.Through years of teaching, researching and making pleats, the researcher as a maker has come to an understanding that pleating, like other textile productions, for example, stitching and weaving, has its own philosophical stance as a distinct branch under textile thinking.Pliable logic merges three textile-thinking-related concepts, including "soft logic" from Pennia Barnett, Sarat Maharaj's description of Janis Jefferies' "creative production" and "plica ex plica" from Gilles Deleuze, all of which resonate to certain characters of pleats and pleating that establish the foundation of the methodology. The details of each element are illustrated in this paper.The intention of the paper is to (1) encourage textile design practitioners and researchers to consider their study and production from another perspective under textile thinking and to (2) emphasize that various textile fabrications do have a potential philosophical stance to broaden the scope of textile thinking.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 157
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Practice-Led Account of the Conceptual Evolution of UX Knowledge
    Kou, Yubo
    Gray, Colin M.
    CHI 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,
  • [2] Research-Practice Partnerships in Education: Advancing an Evolutionary Logic of Systems Improvement
    Penuel, William R.
    Furtak, Erin Marie
    Farrell, Caitlin C.
    DDS-DIE DEUTSCHE SCHULE, 2021, 113 (01): : 45 - 62
  • [3] Practices of robust design methodology in practice
    Gremyr I.
    Hasenkamp T.
    TQM Journal, 2011, 23 (01): : 47 - 58
  • [4] Decomposition of Practice as an Activity for Research-Practice Partnerships
    Resnick, Alison Fox
    Kazemi, Elham
    AERA OPEN, 2019, 5 (03)
  • [5] ACTION RESEARCH IN PRACTICE
    Farel, Romain
    DESIGN FOR HARMONIES, VOL 2: DESIGN THEORY AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2013,
  • [6] GRASPING THE LOGIC OF PRACTICE: THEORIZING THROUGH PRACTICAL RATIONALITY
    Sandberg, Joergen
    Tsoukas, Haridimos
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2011, 36 (02): : 338 - 360
  • [7] Design-led policy and governance in practice: a global perspective
    Mortati, Marzia
    Mullagh, Louise
    Schmidt, Scott
    POLICY DESIGN AND PRACTICE, 2022, 5 (04) : 399 - 409
  • [8] Universal pedagogy: research at the service of practice
    Desmarais, Marie-Elaine
    Flanagan, Tara
    EDUCATION ET FRANCOPHONIE, 2023, 51 (01)
  • [9] Card Sorting For Cartographic Research and Practice
    Roth, Robert E.
    Finch, Benjamin G.
    Blanford, Justine I.
    Klippel, Alexander
    Robinson, Anthony C.
    MacEachren, Allan M.
    CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2011, 38 (02) : 89 - 99
  • [10] Research for Designers: A Guide to Methods and Practice
    Coan, April
    QUALITATIVE REPORT, 2018, 23 (02) : 439 - 441