Machine learning versus human learning in predicting glass-forming ability of metallic glasses

被引:33
作者
Liu, Guannan [1 ]
Sohn, Sungwoo [1 ]
Kube, Sebastian A. [1 ]
Raj, Arindam [1 ]
Mertz, Andrew [1 ]
Nawano, Aya [1 ]
Gilbert, Anna [2 ,3 ]
Shattuck, Mark D. [4 ,5 ]
O'Hern, Corey S. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
Schroers, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Dept Mech Engn & Mat Sci, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Dept Math, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Dept Stat & Data Sci, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[4] City Coll City Univ New York, Benjamin Levich Inst, New York, NY 10031 USA
[5] City Coll City Univ New York, Phys Dept, New York, NY 10031 USA
[6] Yale Univ, Dept Appl Phys, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[7] Yale Univ, Dept Phys, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Machine learning; Human learning; Materials design; Metallic glass; Glass -forming ability; ATOMIC SIZE DIFFERENCE; TEMPERATURE; SCIENCE; ALLOYS;
D O I
10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118497
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Complex materials science problems such as glass formation must consider large system sizes that are many orders of magnitude too large to be solved by first-principles calculations. The successful applica-tion of machine learning (ML) in various other fields suggests that ML could be useful to address complex problems in materials science. To test its efficacy, we attempt to predict bulk metallic glass formation using ML. Surprisingly, we find that a recently developed ML model based on 201 alloy features con-structed using simple combinations of 31 elemental features is indistinguishable from models that are based on unphysical features. The 201ML-model performs better than the unphysical model only when significant separation of training and testing data is achieved. However, it performs significantly worse than a human-learning based three-feature model. The limited performance of the 201ML-model origi-nates from the inability to accurately represent alloy features through elemental features, showing that physical insights about mixing behavior are required to develop predictable ML models.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Acta Materialia Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Metallic glasses as structural materials [J].
Ashby, MF ;
Greer, AL .
SCRIPTA MATERIALIA, 2006, 54 (03) :321-326
[2]   Crystal nucleation in deeply undercooled melts of bulk metallic glass forming systems [J].
Assadi, H ;
Schroers, J .
ACTA MATERIALIA, 2002, 50 (01) :89-100
[3]   Solidification microstructures: Recent developments, future directions [J].
Boettinger, WJ ;
Coriell, SR ;
Greer, AL ;
Karma, A ;
Kurz, W ;
Rappaz, M ;
Trivedi, R .
ACTA MATERIALIA, 2000, 48 (01) :43-70
[4]   A survey on feature selection methods [J].
Chandrashekar, Girish ;
Sahin, Ferat .
COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 40 (01) :16-28
[5]   Graph Networks as a Universal Machine Learning Framework for Molecules and Crystals [J].
Chen, Chi ;
Ye, Weike ;
Zuo, Yunxing ;
Zheng, Chen ;
Ong, Shyue Ping .
CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS, 2019, 31 (09) :3564-3572
[6]  
Ding SY, 2014, NAT MATER, V13, P494, DOI [10.1038/NMAT3939, 10.1038/nmat3939]
[7]   Machine Learning Energies of 2 Million Elpasolite (ABC2D6) Crystals [J].
Faber, Felix A. ;
Lindmaa, Alexander ;
von Lilienfeld, O. Anatole ;
Armiento, Rickard .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2016, 117 (13)
[8]   New horizons for glass formation and stability [J].
Greer, A. Lindsay .
NATURE MATERIALS, 2015, 14 (06) :542-546
[9]   MATERIALS SCIENCE - CONFUSION BY DESIGN [J].
GREER, AL .
NATURE, 1993, 366 (6453) :303-304
[10]   Combining combinatorial nanocalorimetry and X-ray diffraction techniques to study the effects of composition and quench rate on Au-Cu-Si metallic glasses [J].
Gregoire, John M. ;
McCluskey, Patrick J. ;
Dale, Darren ;
Ding, Shiyan ;
Schroers, Jan ;
Vlassak, Joost J. .
SCRIPTA MATERIALIA, 2012, 66 (3-4) :178-181