Between the Social and the Built Environments: Understanding Walking in Deprived Neighborhoods of Santiago

被引:2
作者
Figueroa-Martinez, Cristhian [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Desarrollo Urbano Sustentable, CEDEUS, Santiago, Chile
关键词
Disadvantaged neighborhoods; walking; built environment; social sphere; qualitative methods; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; TRAVEL; MOBILITY; WALKABILITY; ASSOCIATION; ADULTS; PLACE; CITY;
D O I
10.5354/0717-5051.2023.69411
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
A significant number of works have sought to identify the social and physical attributes that may encourage walking. However, little is known about how such attributes influence those who walk in socio-economically deprived neighborhoods. The article explores how the social sphere and the built environment influence walking in deprived neighborhoods. To do so, it reports the findings of a qualitative research carried out in four neighborhoods of Santiago de Chile that are experiencing a sharp decline in their socio-spatial structures. The findings indicate that aspects of the social sphere (social networks, ties) influence people's perception of insecurity, their willingness to complete trips with social purposes, the extension of the territories considered "walkable", and the feeling of loneliness that accompanies many of the walks that take place in disadvantaged neighborhoods. The attributes of the built environment mirror the social sphere, influence the experience of walking, are cues for risks that shape people's behavior, and collaborate in the delineation of what is considered "normal." The analysis showed that walking is at risk in Santiago's deprived neighborhoods; a complex activity that should be protected by means of multidimensional strategies that simultaneously address the social sphere and the built environment.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 41
页数:21
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Contextualizing Walkability Do Relationships Between Built Environments and Walking Vary by Socioeconomic Context?
    Adkins, Arlie
    Makarewicz, Carrie
    Scanze, Michele
    Ingram, Maia
    Luhr, Gretchen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2017, 83 (03) : 296 - 314
  • [2] Alcaino P., 2005, Santas o Mundanas: Paradojas y coerciones en el consumo de las mujeres
  • [3] Urban walkability considering pedestrians' perceptions of the built environment: a 10-year review and a case study in a medium-sized city in Latin America
    Arellana, Julian
    Saltarin, Maria
    Larranaga, Ana Margarita
    Alvarez, Vilma
    Henao, Cesar Augusto
    [J]. TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2020, 40 (02) : 183 - 203
  • [4] Identifying the underlying constructs linking urban form and travel behaviour using a grounded theory approach
    Banerjee, U.
    Hine, J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 11 (08) : 2217 - 2232
  • [5] Where Inequality Takes Place: A Programmatic Argument for Urban Sociology
    Benediktsson, Mike Owen
    [J]. CITY & COMMUNITY, 2018, 17 (02) : 394 - 417
  • [6] From Public Familiarity to Comfort Zone: The Relevance of Absent Ties for Belonging in Berlin's Mixed Neighbourhoods
    Blokland, Talja
    Nast, Julia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 38 (04) : 1142 - 1159
  • [7] Pathways of disadvantage? Walking as a mode of transport among low-income mothers
    Bostock, L
    [J]. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2001, 9 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [8] Narrative Research Evolving: Evolving Through Narrative Research
    Bruce, Anne
    Beuthin, Rosanne
    Sheilds, Laurene
    Molzahn, Anita
    Schick-Makaroff, Kara
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2016, 15 (01):
  • [9] Buehler R., 2016, Moving toward active transportation: how policies can encourage walking and bicycling, DOI [10.5167/uzh-128504, DOI 10.5167/UZH-128504]
  • [10] Economic analyses of transport infrastructure and policies including health effects related to cycling and walking: A systematic reviews
    Cavill, Nick
    Kahlmeier, Sonja
    Rutter, Harry
    Racioppi, Francesca
    Oja, Pekka
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2008, 15 (05) : 291 - 304