Predicted Heart Mass: A Tale of 2 Ventricles

被引:0
作者
Rodenas-Alesina, Eduard [1 ]
Foroutan, Farid [2 ]
Fan, Chun-Po [2 ]
Stehlik, Josef [3 ]
Bartlett, Ina [1 ]
Tremblay-Gravel, Maxime [4 ,5 ]
Aleksova, Natasha [1 ]
Rao, Vivek
Miller, Robert J. H. [6 ]
Khush, Kiran K. [7 ]
Ross, Heather J. [1 ]
Moayedi, Yasbanoo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Network, Ted Rogers Ctr Heart Res, Peter Munk Cardiac Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Hlth Network, Ted Rogers Computat Program, Peter Munk Cardiac Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Cardiovasc Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Univ Montreal, Div Cardiol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, Cardiac Transplant & Mechan Circulatory Support, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Calgary, Div Cardiol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[7] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Div Cardiovasc Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
donor-recipient matching; graft failure; heart transplant; mortality; predicted heart mass; SIZE; TRANSPLANTATION; SEX;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.008311
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Total predicted heart mass (PHM) is the recommended metric to assess donor-recipient size matching in patients undergoing heart transplantation. Separately measuring right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) PHM may improve risk prediction of 1-year graft failure. METHODS: Adult heart transplant recipients from the UNOS database from 2000 to 2018 were included in the study. LV and RV PHM were modeled as restricted cubic splines. The association with 1-year graft failure was determined using adjusted Cox regression. The risk reclassification of using both LV and RV PHM versus total PHM was assessed using the net reclassification index. RESULTS: A total of 34976 recipients were included. We observed a U-shaped association between total PHM and 1-year graft failure, such that risk increased for hearts undersized by >15% and those oversized by more than 27%. Graft failure incrementally increased when LV PHM was undersized by more than 5% and when RV was oversized by >20%. There was 1.5-fold greater risk of graft failure for an LV undersized by >26% or an RV oversized by more than 40%. Using LV and RV PHM risk-assessment separately led to a net reclassification index=8.5% ([95% CI, 5.3%-11.7%], nonevent net reclassification index=9.1%, event net reclassification index=-0.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The association between donor-recipient PHM match and the risk of graft failure after heart transplantation can be further understood as risk attributable to LV undersizing and RV oversizing. Assessing LV and RV PHM separately instead of total PHM could further refine the methods used to match donors and recipients for heart transplantation, minimize the risk of 1-year graft failure, and increase the use of donor organs.
引用
收藏
页码:787 / 795
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Predicted heart mass for size matching in obese heart transplant donors and recipients
    Aleksova, Natasha
    Fan, Chun-Po S.
    Foroutan, Farid
    Moayedi, Yas
    Posada, Juan Duero
    McGuinty, Caroline
    Luk, Adriana
    Stehlik, Josef
    Ross, Heather J.
    Alba, Ana C.
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 36 (08)
  • [2] The Relationship of Left Ventricular Mass and Geometry to Incident Cardiovascular Events
    Bluemke, David A.
    Kronmal, Richard A.
    Lima, Joao A. C.
    Liu, Kiang
    Olson, Jean
    Burke, Gregory L.
    Folsom, Aaron R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2008, 52 (25) : 2148 - 2155
  • [3] Size matching in heart transplantation: Is predicted heart mass the optimal method in a United Kingdom cohort?
    Cheshire, Caitlin
    Kydd, Anna
    Nerlekar, Nitesh
    Catarino, Pedro
    Brown, Adam
    Parameshwar, Jayan
    Pettit, Stephen
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 35 (03)
  • [4] Sizing it up in heart transplantation: Time to change the guidelines?
    Givertz, Michael M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 38 (02) : 133 - 135
  • [5] Donor predicted heart mass as predictor of primary graft dysfunction
    Gong, Timothy A.
    Joseph, Susan M.
    Lima, Brian
    Gonzalez-Stawinski, Gonzalo V.
    Jamil, Aayla K.
    Felius, Joost
    Qin, Huanying
    Saracino, Giovanna
    Rafael, Aldo E.
    Kale, Parag
    Hall, ShelleyA.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 37 (07) : 826 - 835
  • [6] Humbert M, 2022, EUROPEAN HEART
  • [7] Sex and Race Differences in Right Ventricular Structure and Function The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis-Right Ventricle Study
    Kawut, Steven M.
    Lima, Joao A. C.
    Barr, R. Graham
    Chahal, Harjit
    Jain, Aditya
    Tandri, Harikrishna
    Praestgaard, Amy
    Bagiella, Emilia
    Kizer, Jorge R.
    Johnson, W. Craig
    Kronmal, Richard A.
    Bluemke, David A.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2011, 123 (22) : 2542 - U116
  • [8] The International Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Thirty-sixth adult heart transplantation report-2019; focus theme: Donor and recipient size match
    Khush, Kiran K.
    Cherikh, Wida S.
    Chambers, Daniel C.
    Harhay, Michael O.
    Hayes, Don, Jr.
    Hsich, Eileen
    Meiser, Bruno
    Potena, Luciano
    Robinson, Amanda
    Rossano, Joseph W.
    Sadavarte, Aparna
    Singh, Tajinder P.
    Zuckermann, Andreas
    Stehlik, Josef
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 38 (10) : 1056 - 1066
  • [9] Kransdorf E, 2017, J HEART LUNG TRANSPL, V36, pS113
  • [10] The results of a single-center experience with HeartMate 3 in a biventricular configuration
    McGiffin, David
    Kure, Christina
    McLean, Janelle
    Marasco, Silvana
    Bergin, Peter
    Hare, James L.
    Leet, Angeline
    Patel, Hitesh
    Zimmet, Adam
    Rix, Julia
    Taylor, Andrew
    Kaye, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 40 (03) : 193 - 200