After the Split: Market Efficiency of Bitcoin Cash

被引:3
|
作者
Kim, Hyeonoh [1 ]
Yi, Eojin [2 ]
Jeon, Jooyoung [3 ]
Park, Taeyoung [4 ]
Ahn, Kwangwon [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst S&T Evaluat & Planning, Eumseong Gun, South Korea
[2] ASSIST Univ, Seoul Business Sch, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Future Strategy, Daejeon, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Dept Stat & Data Sci, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, Ctr Finance & Technol, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Market efficiency; Quantum harmonic oscillator; Bitcoin Cash; Hard fork; QUANTUM MODEL; PRICE DISCOVERY; OIL PRICE; STOCK; INEFFICIENCY; VOLUME; CRYPTOCURRENCY; FLUCTUATIONS; LIQUIDITY; FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1007/s10614-023-10427-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates the weak-form efficient market hypothesis for Bitcoin Cash compared with Bitcoin by applying the concept of quantum harmonic oscillator. Our findings indicate that the Bitcoin Cash market is comparable to, or even more efficient than, the Bitcoin market despite its short history and high market uncertainty. The two most notable conclusions are (i) both Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash markets tend to be bounded mostly at the smallest uncertainty level, indicating that all past prices are reflected in today's price and (ii) the adjustment speed of the log return series to the long-term equilibrium occurs three times faster in the Bitcoin Cash market than in the Bitcoin market. Furthermore, the degree of market integration between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash markets explains why the latter can be considered a fair value on cryptocurrency exchanges. The findings suggest that policymakers must fully consider market synchronization between the original and split markets as well as other key factors, such as supporting technology and market frictions, to prevent regulatory arbitrage.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 427
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Price divergence in bitcoin market
    Chu, Gang
    Li, Xiao
    Shen, Dehua
    Urquhart, Andrew
    REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2024,
  • [42] Is there an expiration effect in the bitcoin market?
    Blasco, N.
    Corredor, P.
    Satrustegui, N.
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 85 : 647 - 663
  • [44] The impact of margin trading and short selling by retail investors on market price efficiency: Empirical evidence from bitcoin exchanges
    Strych, Jan-Oliver
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 47
  • [45] Weak efficiency of the cryptocurrency market: a market portfolio approach
    Vidal-Tomas, David
    Ibanez, Ana M.
    Farinos, Jose E.
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2019, 26 (19) : 1627 - 1633
  • [46] Forecasting bitcoin volatility: Evidence from the options market
    Hoang, Lai T.
    Baur, Dirk G.
    JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2020, 40 (10) : 1584 - 1602
  • [47] Investor attention and cryptocurrency: Evidence from the Bitcoin market
    Zhu, Panpan
    Zhang, Xing
    Wu, You
    Zheng, Hao
    Zhang, Yinpeng
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [48] Manipulation of the Bitcoin market: an agent-based study
    Fratric, Peter
    Sileno, Giovanni
    Klous, Sander
    van Engers, Tom
    FINANCIAL INNOVATION, 2022, 8 (01)
  • [49] Liquidity and the convergence to market efficiency
    Young, Nicara
    Auret, Christo
    INVESTMENT ANALYSTS JOURNAL, 2018, 47 (03) : 209 - 228
  • [50] Liquidity and market efficiency in cryptocurrencies
    Wei, Wang Chun
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 168 : 21 - 24