After the Split: Market Efficiency of Bitcoin Cash

被引:3
|
作者
Kim, Hyeonoh [1 ]
Yi, Eojin [2 ]
Jeon, Jooyoung [3 ]
Park, Taeyoung [4 ]
Ahn, Kwangwon [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst S&T Evaluat & Planning, Eumseong Gun, South Korea
[2] ASSIST Univ, Seoul Business Sch, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Future Strategy, Daejeon, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Dept Stat & Data Sci, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, Ctr Finance & Technol, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Market efficiency; Quantum harmonic oscillator; Bitcoin Cash; Hard fork; QUANTUM MODEL; PRICE DISCOVERY; OIL PRICE; STOCK; INEFFICIENCY; VOLUME; CRYPTOCURRENCY; FLUCTUATIONS; LIQUIDITY; FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1007/s10614-023-10427-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates the weak-form efficient market hypothesis for Bitcoin Cash compared with Bitcoin by applying the concept of quantum harmonic oscillator. Our findings indicate that the Bitcoin Cash market is comparable to, or even more efficient than, the Bitcoin market despite its short history and high market uncertainty. The two most notable conclusions are (i) both Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash markets tend to be bounded mostly at the smallest uncertainty level, indicating that all past prices are reflected in today's price and (ii) the adjustment speed of the log return series to the long-term equilibrium occurs three times faster in the Bitcoin Cash market than in the Bitcoin market. Furthermore, the degree of market integration between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash markets explains why the latter can be considered a fair value on cryptocurrency exchanges. The findings suggest that policymakers must fully consider market synchronization between the original and split markets as well as other key factors, such as supporting technology and market frictions, to prevent regulatory arbitrage.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 427
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The relationship between trend and volume on the bitcoin market
    Beata Szetela
    Grzegorz Mentel
    Yuriy Bilan
    Urszula Mentel
    Eurasian Economic Review, 2021, 11 : 25 - 42
  • [32] Dynamic efficiency and arbitrage potential in Bitcoin: A long-memory approach
    Duan, Kun
    Li, Zeming
    Urquhart, Andrew
    Ye, Jinqiang
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 75
  • [33] After the Splits: Information Flow between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Family
    Yi, Eojin
    Cho, Yerim
    Sohn, Sungbin
    Ahn, Kwangwon
    CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2021, 142
  • [34] The efficiency of Bitcoin: A strongly typed genetic programming approach to smart electronic Bitcoin markets
    Manahov, Viktor
    Urquhart, Andrew
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 73
  • [35] BITCOIN CASH: STOCHASTIC MODELS OF FAT-TAIL RETURNS AND RISK MODELING
    Sheraz, Muhammad
    Dedu, Silvia
    ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2020, 54 (03) : 43 - 58
  • [36] Trading patterns in the bitcoin market
    Liu, Anqi
    Jahanshahloo, Hossein
    Chen, Jing
    Eshraghi, Arman
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2023,
  • [37] Manipulation of the Bitcoin market: an agent-based study
    Peter Fratrič
    Giovanni Sileno
    Sander Klous
    Tom van Engers
    Financial Innovation, 8
  • [38] Bitcoin market networks and cyberattacks
    Costantini, Mauro
    Maaitah, Ahmad
    Mishra, Tapas
    Sousa, Ricardo M.
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2023, 630
  • [39] Regulatory ambiguity in the market for bitcoin
    Luther, William J.
    REVIEW OF AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS, 2022, 35 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [40] Regulatory ambiguity in the market for bitcoin
    William J. Luther
    The Review of Austrian Economics, 2022, 35 : 1 - 14