After the Split: Market Efficiency of Bitcoin Cash

被引:3
|
作者
Kim, Hyeonoh [1 ]
Yi, Eojin [2 ]
Jeon, Jooyoung [3 ]
Park, Taeyoung [4 ]
Ahn, Kwangwon [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Korea Inst S&T Evaluat & Planning, Eumseong Gun, South Korea
[2] ASSIST Univ, Seoul Business Sch, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Future Strategy, Daejeon, South Korea
[4] Yonsei Univ, Dept Stat & Data Sci, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Yonsei Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Yonsei Univ, Ctr Finance & Technol, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Market efficiency; Quantum harmonic oscillator; Bitcoin Cash; Hard fork; QUANTUM MODEL; PRICE DISCOVERY; OIL PRICE; STOCK; INEFFICIENCY; VOLUME; CRYPTOCURRENCY; FLUCTUATIONS; LIQUIDITY; FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1007/s10614-023-10427-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigates the weak-form efficient market hypothesis for Bitcoin Cash compared with Bitcoin by applying the concept of quantum harmonic oscillator. Our findings indicate that the Bitcoin Cash market is comparable to, or even more efficient than, the Bitcoin market despite its short history and high market uncertainty. The two most notable conclusions are (i) both Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash markets tend to be bounded mostly at the smallest uncertainty level, indicating that all past prices are reflected in today's price and (ii) the adjustment speed of the log return series to the long-term equilibrium occurs three times faster in the Bitcoin Cash market than in the Bitcoin market. Furthermore, the degree of market integration between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash markets explains why the latter can be considered a fair value on cryptocurrency exchanges. The findings suggest that policymakers must fully consider market synchronization between the original and split markets as well as other key factors, such as supporting technology and market frictions, to prevent regulatory arbitrage.
引用
收藏
页码:411 / 427
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Market reaction to large transfers on the Bitcoin blockchain-Do size and motive matter?
    Ante, Lennart
    Fiedler, Ingo
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 39
  • [22] Did the introduction of Bitcoin futures crash the Bitcoin market at the end of 2017?
    Hattori, Takahiro
    Ishida, Ryo
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2021, 56
  • [23] The Accuracy of the Tick Rule in the Bitcoin Market
    Ma, Donglian
    Zhai, Pengxiang
    SAGE OPEN, 2021, 11 (02):
  • [24] The Effect of the Launch of Bitcoin Futures on the Cryptocurrency Market: An Economic Efficiency Approach
    Vidal-Tomas, David
    Ibanez, Ana M.
    Farinos, Jose E.
    MATHEMATICS, 2021, 9 (04) : 1 - 14
  • [25] What effect did the introduction of Bitcoin futures have on the Bitcoin spot market?
    Jalan, Akanksha
    Matkovskyy, Roman
    Urquhart, Andrew
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2021, 27 (13) : 1251 - 1281
  • [26] Macroeconomic news announcements and market efficiency: Evidence from the US Treasury market
    Lin, Hai
    Lo, Ingrid
    Qiao, Rui
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2021, 133
  • [27] Efficiency of the Brazilian Bitcoin: A DFA Approach
    Quintino, Derick
    Campoli, Jessica
    Burnquist, Heloisa
    Ferreira, Paulo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2020, 8 (02): : 1 - 9
  • [28] Semi-strong efficiency of Bitcoin
    Vidal-Tomas, David
    Ibanez, Ana
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 27 : 259 - 265
  • [29] The relationship between trend and volume on the bitcoin market
    Szetela, Beata
    Mentel, Grzegorz
    Bilan, Yuriy
    Mentel, Urszula
    EURASIAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2021, 11 (01) : 25 - 42
  • [30] Liquidity uncertainty and Bitcoin's market microstructure
    Koutmos, Dimitrios
    ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 172 : 97 - 101