Multi-hazard assessment using machine learning and remote sensing in the North Central region of Vietnam

被引:9
作者
Nguyen, Huu Duy [1 ,7 ]
Dang, Dinh-Kha [2 ]
Bui, Quang-Thanh [1 ]
Petrisor, Alexandru-Ionut [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Vietnam Natl Univ, Univ Sci, Fac Geog, Hanoi, Vietnam
[2] Vietnam Natl Univ, VNU Univ Sci, Fac Hydrol Meteorol & Oceanog, Hanoi, Vietnam
[3] Ion Mincu Univ Architecture & Urbanism, Doctoral Sch Urban Planning, Bucharest, Romania
[4] Tech Univ Moldova, Fac Architecture & Urban Planning, Dept Architecture, Kishinev, Moldova
[5] Natl Inst Res & Dev Construct Urbanism & Sustainab, Bucharest, Romania
[6] Natl Inst Res & Dev Tourism, Bucharest, Romania
[7] Vietnam Natl Univ, Univ Sci, Fac Geog, 334 Nguyen Trai, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; HIERARCHY PROCESS AHP; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; FREQUENCY RATIO; RANDOM-FOREST; FUZZY-LOGIC; FLOOD RISK; SUSCEPTIBILITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/tgis.13091
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Natural hazards constitute a diverse category and are unevenly distributed in time and space. This hinders predictive efforts, leading to significant impacts on human life and economies. Multi-hazard prediction is vital for any natural hazard risk management plan. The main objective of this study was the development of a multi-hazard susceptibility mapping framework, by combining two natural hazards-flooding and landslides-in the North Central region of Vietnam. This was accomplished using support vector machines, random forest, and AdaBoost. The input data consisted of 4591 flood points, 1315 landslide points, and 13 conditioning factors, split into training (70%), and testing (30%) datasets. The accuracy of the models' predictions was evaluated using the statistical indices root mean square error, area under curve (AUC), mean absolute error, and coefficient of determination. All proposed models were good at predicting multi-hazard susceptibility, with AUC values over 0.95. Among them, the AUC value for the support vector machine model was 0.98 and 0.99 for landslide and flood, respectively. For the random forest model, these values were 0.98 and 0.98, and for AdaBoost, they were 0.99 and 0.99. The multi-hazard maps were built by combining the landslide and flood susceptibility maps. The results showed that approximately 60% of the study area was affected by landslides, 30% by flood, and 8% by both hazards. These results illustrate how North Central is one of the regions of Vietnam that is most severely affected by natural hazards, particularly flooding, and landslides. The proposed models adapt to evaluate multi-hazard susceptibility at different scales, although expert intervention is also required, to optimize the algorithms. Multi-hazard maps can provide a valuable point of reference for decision makers in sustainable land-use planning and infrastructure development in regions faced with multiple hazards, and to prevent and reduce more effectively the frequency of floods and landslides and their damage to human life and property.
引用
收藏
页码:1614 / 1640
页数:27
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]   Assessment of landslide susceptibility zonation using frequency ratio and statistical index: a case study of Al-Fawar basin, Tartous, Syria [J].
Abdo, H. G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 19 (04) :2599-2618
[2]   Flash-flood susceptibility mapping based on XGBoost, random forest and boosted regression trees [J].
Abedi, Rahebeh ;
Costache, Romulus ;
Shafizadeh-Moghadam, Hossein ;
Pham, Quoc Bao .
GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (19) :5479-5496
[3]   The Hooskanaden Landslide: historic and recent surge behavior of an active earthflow on the Oregon Coast [J].
Alberti, Stefano ;
Senogles, Andrew ;
Kingen, Kara ;
Booth, Adam ;
Castro, Pete ;
DeKoekkoek, Jill ;
Glover-Cutter, Kira ;
Mohney, Curran ;
Olsen, Michael ;
Leshchinsky, Ben .
LANDSLIDES, 2020, 17 (11) :2589-2602
[4]   Decision tree based ensemble machine learning approaches for landslide susceptibility mapping [J].
Arabameri, Alireza ;
Chandra Pal, Subodh ;
Rezaie, Fatemeh ;
Chakrabortty, Rabin ;
Saha, Asish ;
Blaschke, Thomas ;
Di Napoli, Mariano ;
Ghorbanzadeh, Omid ;
Thi Ngo, Phuong Thao .
GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (16) :4594-4627
[5]  
Ashraf S., 2017, Flood risk management, DOI [DOI 10.5772/INTECHOPEN.69139, 10.5772/intechopen.69139]
[6]   DEM resolution effects on machine learning performance for flood probability mapping [J].
Avand, Mohammadtaghi ;
Kuriqi, Alban ;
Khazaei, Majid ;
Ghorbanzadeh, Omid .
JOURNAL OF HYDRO-ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2022, 40 :1-16
[7]   Landslide Susceptibility Assessment by Novel Hybrid Machine Learning Algorithms [J].
Binh Thai Pham ;
Shirzadi, Ataollah ;
Shahabi, Himan ;
Omidvar, Ebrahim ;
Singh, Sushant K. ;
Sahana, Mehebub ;
Asl, Dawood Talebpour ;
Bin Ahmad, Baharin ;
Nguyen Kim Quoc ;
Lee, Saro .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (16)
[8]   Multi-hazard spatial modeling via ensembles of machine learning and meta-heuristic techniques [J].
Bordbar, Mojgan ;
Aghamohammadi, Hossein ;
Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza ;
Azizi, Zahra .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
[9]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32
[10]   Multi-geohazards susceptibility mapping based on machine learning-a case study in Jiuzhaigou, China [J].
Cao, Juan ;
Zhang, Zhao ;
Du, Jie ;
Zhang, Liangliang ;
Song, Yun ;
Sun, Geng .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2020, 102 (03) :851-871