Effects of isolation housing stress and mouse strain on intravenous cocaine self-administration, sensory stimulus self-administration, and reward preference

被引:0
|
作者
Leonardo, Michael [1 ]
Brunty, Sarah [1 ]
Huffman, Jessica [1 ]
Lester, Deranda B. [2 ]
Dickson, Price E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Marshall Univ, Joan C Edwards Sch Med, Dept Biomed Sci, 1700 3rd Ave, Huntington, WV 25703 USA
[2] Univ Memphis, Dept Psychol, 202 Psychol Bldg, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
关键词
PREPULSE INHIBITION; SENSATION SEEKING; BEHAVIORS; C57BL/6J; GENETICS; INCREASE; RATS; MICE;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-29579-9
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Sensory stimuli are natural rewards in mice and humans. Consequently, preference for a drug reward relative to a sensory reward may be an endophenotype of addiction vulnerability. In this study, we developed a novel behavioral assay to quantify the preference for intravenous drug self-administration relative to sensory stimulus self-administration. We used founder strains of the BXD recombinant inbred mouse panel (C57BL/6J, DBA/2J) and a model of stress (isolation vs enriched housing) to assess genetic and epigenetic effects. Following 10 weeks of differential housing, all mice were tested under three reward conditions: sensory rewards available, cocaine rewards available, both rewards available. When a single reward was available (sensory stimuli or cocaine; delivered using distinct levers), DBA/2J mice self-administered significantly more rewards than C57BL/6J mice. When both rewards were available, DBA/2J mice exhibited a significant preference for cocaine relative to sensory stimuli; in contrast, C57BL/6J mice exhibited no preference. Housing condition influenced sensory stimulus self-administration and strain-dependently influenced inactive lever pressing when both rewards were available. Collectively, these data reveal strain effects, housing effects, or both on reward self-administration and preference. Most importantly, this study reveals that genetic mechanisms underlying preference for a drug reward relative to a nondrug reward can be dissected using the full BXD panel.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of isolation housing stress and mouse strain on intravenous cocaine self-administration, sensory stimulus self-administration, and reward preference
    Michael Leonardo
    Sarah Brunty
    Jessica Huffman
    Deranda B. Lester
    Price E. Dickson
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [2] Stimulus control of cocaine self-administration
    Weiss, SJ
    Kearns, DN
    Cohn, SI
    Schindler, CW
    Panlilio, LV
    JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 2003, 79 (01) : 111 - 135
  • [3] INTRAVENOUS COCAINE SELF-ADMINISTRATION IN RABBIT
    GROVE, RN
    VERREAULT, R
    PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1977, 1 (3-4): : 347 - 350
  • [4] EFFECTS OF ALPRAZOLAM ON INTRAVENOUS COCAINE SELF-ADMINISTRATION IN RATS
    GOEDERS, NE
    MCNULTY, MA
    GUERIN, GF
    PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1993, 44 (02) : 471 - 474
  • [5] Binge cocaine self-administration in humans: intravenous cocaine
    A. S. Ward
    Margaret Haney
    Marian W. Fischman
    Richard W. Foltin
    Psychopharmacology, 1997, 132 : 375 - 381
  • [6] Binge cocaine self-administration in humans: intravenous cocaine
    Ward, AS
    Haney, M
    Fischman, MW
    Foltin, RW
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 132 (04) : 375 - 381
  • [7] INTRAVENOUS SELF-ADMINISTRATION OF COCAINE AND NORCOCAINE BY DOGS
    RISNER, ME
    JONES, BE
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1980, 71 (01) : 83 - 89
  • [8] Pitolisant and intravenous cocaine self-administration in mice
    Huyts, Benjamin
    Brabant, Christian
    Tirelli, Ezio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 851 : 63 - 68
  • [9] Effects of pergolide on intravenous cocaine self-administration in men and women
    M. Haney
    Richard W. Foltin
    Marian W. Fischman
    Psychopharmacology, 1998, 137 : 15 - 24
  • [10] Social defeat stress, sensitization, and intravenous cocaine self-administration in mice
    Yap, Jasmine J.
    Miczek, Klaus A.
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 192 (02) : 261 - 273