Infants' lexical comprehension and lexical anticipation abilities are closely linked in early language development

被引:4
作者
Reuter, Tracy [1 ]
Mazzei, Carolyn [1 ,2 ]
Lew-Williams, Casey [1 ]
Emberson, Lauren [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Psychol, Princeton, NJ USA
[2] Univ Cambridge, Fac Educ, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ British Columbia, Psychol Dept, Vancouver, BC, Canada
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
PREDICTION ERROR; SPOKEN LANGUAGE; SPEECH; WORDS; SEGMENTATION; EXPECTATION; DETERMINERS; UNDERSTAND; KNOWLEDGE; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1111/infa.12534
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Theories across cognitive domains propose that anticipating upcoming sensory input supports information processing. In line with this view, prior findings indicate that adults and children anticipate upcoming words during real-time language processing, via such processes as prediction and priming. However, it is unclear if anticipatory processes are strictly an outcome of prior language development or are more entwined with language learning and development. We operationalized this theoretical question as whether developmental emergence of comprehension of lexical items occurs before or concurrently with the anticipation of these lexical items. To this end, we tested infants of ages 12, 15, 18, and 24 months (N = 67) on their abilities to comprehend and anticipate familiar nouns. In an eye-tracking task, infants viewed pairs of images and heard sentences with either informative words (e.g., eat) that allowed them to anticipate an upcoming noun (e.g., cookie), or uninformative words (e.g., see). Findings indicated that infants' comprehension and anticipation abilities are closely linked over developmental time and within individuals. Importantly, we do not find evidence for lexical comprehension in the absence of lexical anticipation. Thus, anticipatory processes are present early in infants' second year, suggesting they are a part of language development rather than solely an outcome of it.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 549
页数:18
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference
    Altmann, GTM
    Kamide, Y
    [J]. COGNITION, 1999, 73 (03) : 247 - 264
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, AUD R FREE AUD ED RE
  • [3] Lexical-semantic priming effects during infancy
    Arias-Trejo, Natalia
    Plunkett, Kim
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 364 (1536) : 3633 - 3647
  • [4] The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions
    Bar, Moshe
    [J]. TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2007, 11 (07) : 280 - 289
  • [5] Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
    Barr, Dale J.
    Levy, Roger
    Scheepers, Christoph
    Tily, Harry J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2013, 68 (03) : 255 - 278
  • [6] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [7] Semantic Specificity in One-Year-Olds' Word Comprehension
    Bergelson, Elika
    Aslin, Richard
    [J]. LANGUAGE LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 13 (04) : 481 - 501
  • [8] Nature and origins of the lexicon in 6-mo-olds
    Bergelson, Elika
    Aslin, Richard N.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2017, 114 (49) : 12916 - 12921
  • [9] At 6-9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns
    Bergelson, Elika
    Swingley, Daniel
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (09) : 3253 - 3258
  • [10] Boersma P., 2017, PRAAT DOING PHONETIC