INSTITUTIONAL ADOPTION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF BLENDED LEARNING: DIFFERENCES IN STUDENT PERCEPTIONS

被引:0
作者
Ali, Ramiz [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Fac Arts Social Sci & Humanities, Sch Educ, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
来源
TURKISH ONLINE JOURNAL OF DISTANCE EDUCATION | 2023年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Blended learning; institutional adoption; TAM; higher education; FACE-TO-FACE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE; HIGHER-EDUCATION; USER ACCEPTANCE; PERFORMANCE; ONLINE; MODEL; DETERMINANTS; ENVIRONMENTS; ACHIEVEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Blended learning (BL) has been a popular mode of course delivery in higher education, aiming to provide students with better learning experiences by integrating face-to-face (f2f) instructions and affordances of digital technology. However, lack of knowledge about how students perceive BL cross-disciplines can make it difficult for teachers to provide consistent learning experiences to students, yielding inequity in learning experiences. This study aims to explore how university students perceive BL, and to compare differences in perceptions across subjects. Participants were 407 university students from eight subject disciplines. Data were collected through a questionnaire and were analyzed using SPSS. A one-way ANOVA was performed to compare the differences between the groups. Results showed, students were generally happy about the use of BL, despite facing multiple barriers in using the learning approach. Results further revealed that students studying tourism/hospitality, and business subjects were more negative about BL, while students in science, and Islamic studies faculties were more receptive to BL compared to the rest of the university.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 53
页数:17
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Adedokun O.A., 2017, Journal of Learning Spaces, V6, P1
[2]  
Al Zumor A., 2013, English Language Teaching, V6, P95, DOI [10.5539/elt.v6n10p95, DOI 10.5539/ELT.V6N10P95]
[3]   Blended Learning Adoption and Implementation in Higher Education: A Theoretical and Systematic Review [J].
Anthony, Bokolo, Jr. ;
Kamaludin, Adzhar ;
Romli, Awanis ;
Raffei, Anis Farihan Mat ;
Phon, Danakorn Nincarean A. L. Eh ;
Abdullah, Aziman ;
Ming, Gan Leong .
TECHNOLOGY KNOWLEDGE AND LEARNING, 2022, 27 (02) :531-578
[4]   Exploring the role of blended learning for teaching and learning effectiveness in institutions of higher learning: An empirical investigation [J].
Anthony, Bokolo, Jr. ;
Kamaludin, Adzhar ;
Romli, Awanis ;
Raffei, Anis Farihan Mat ;
Phon, Danakorn Nincarean A. L. Eh ;
Abdullah, Aziman ;
Ming, Gan Leong ;
Shukor, Nurbiha A. ;
Nordin, Mohd Shukri ;
Baba, Suria .
EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2019, 24 (06) :3433-3466
[6]   Maximising motivators for technology-enhanced learning for further education teachers: moving beyond the early adopters in a time of austerity [J].
Armstrong, Emily J. .
RESEARCH IN LEARNING TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 27
[7]   Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review [J].
Boelens, Ruth ;
De Wever, Bram ;
Voet, Michiel .
EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2017, 22 :1-18
[8]   Design and implementation factors in blended synchronous learning environments: Outcomes from a cross-case analysis [J].
Bower, Matt ;
Dalgarno, Barney ;
Kennedy, Gregor E. ;
Lee, Mark J. W. ;
Kenney, Jacqueline .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2015, 86 :1-17
[9]   Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors' adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching [J].
Brown, Michael Geoffrey .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 31 :1-10
[10]   Experts speaking: Crucial teacher attributes for implementing blended learning in higher education [J].
Bruggeman, Bram ;
Tondeur, Jo ;
Struyven, Katrien ;
Pynoo, Bram ;
Garone, Anja ;
Vanslambrouck, Silke .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2021, 48