Performance of urban rail transit: a review of measures and interdependencies

被引:18
作者
Awad, Farah A. A. [1 ]
Graham, Daniel J. J. [1 ]
AitBihiOuali, Laila [2 ]
Singh, Ramandeep [1 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Transport Strategy Ctr, Ctr Transport Studies, Dept Civil Engn, London SW7 2BX, England
[2] Univ Southampton, Dept Civil Engn, Southampton, England
关键词
Urban rail; quality of service; cost performance; efficiency; public transit; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; SERVICE QUALITY; CUSTOMER SATISFACTION; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; BUS ROUTES; BENCHMARKING; SCALE; DEA; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/01441647.2023.2166146
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Recent years saw immense growth in performance measurement literature related to public transit systems, with a clear segmentation between financial and quality-of-service performance frameworks. Recently, there has been a shift away from considering cost efficiency alone as a performance measure, and quality-of-service - which influences ridership attraction and retention - has been receiving more interest. The segmentation of these two performance aspects poses a gap in the literature, as there are interdependencies between them. This study provides a systematic review of the methodologies and empirical findings of studies on both performance measurement aspects of urban rail transit systems; specifically, we demonstrate the importance of linking cost efficiency analyses to the level of service quality. To our knowledge, this is the first review of urban rail transit research that links the two performance aspects. We begin by reviewing the methodological limitations of cost performance measures and summarising the drivers of cost performance in the existing literature. We then review studies on the definitions and measurements of quality-of-service in urban rail performance. Lastly, we summarise the scant literature linking the two performance aspects and highlight future study directions, mainly, the importance of a structural framework to provide a holistic view of transit operators' performance.
引用
收藏
页码:698 / 725
页数:28
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]   DEA based estimation of the technical efficiency of state transport undertakings in India [J].
Agarwal, Shivi ;
Yadav, Shiv ;
Singh, S. .
OPSEARCH, 2010, 47 (03) :216-230
[2]  
Aigner D.J., 1977, J. Econ., V6, P21, DOI [10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5, DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5]
[3]   On the effect of operational service attributes on transit satisfaction [J].
Allen, Jaime ;
Munoz, Juan Carlos ;
de Dios Ortuzar, Juan .
TRANSPORTATION, 2020, 47 (05) :2307-2336
[4]  
Andrikopoulos A. A., 1992, INT J TRANSP ECON, V19, P127
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, VThird, DOI DOI 10.17226/24766
[6]  
[Anonymous], PUBLIC TRANSPORTATIO, DOI 10.1016/b978-0-08-102080-7.00002-1
[7]   Understanding the costs of urban rail transport operations [J].
Anupriya ;
Graham, Daniel J. ;
Carbo, Jose M. ;
Anderson, Richard J. ;
Bansal, Prateek .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2020, 138 :292-316
[8]   Standard costs of regional public rail passenger transport: evidence from Italy [J].
Avenali, Alessandro ;
Boitani, Andrea ;
Catalano, Giuseppe ;
Matteucci, Giorgio ;
Monticini, Andrea .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 52 (15) :1704-1717
[9]   A hybrid approach based on SERVQUAL and fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluating transportation service quality [J].
Awasthi, Anjali ;
Chauhan, Satyaveer S. ;
Omrani, Hichem ;
Panahi, Ariyo .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 61 (03) :637-646
[10]   A fuzzy-based multi-dimensional and multi-period service quality evaluation outline for rail transit systems [J].
Aydin, Nezir .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2017, 55 :87-98