Robotic CME in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection

被引:6
|
作者
Maertens, Vicky [1 ]
Stefan, Samuel [1 ]
Mykoniatis, Ioannis [1 ]
Siddiqi, Najaf [2 ]
David, Gerald [1 ]
Khan, Jim S. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NHS Trust, Portsmouth Hosp Univ, Dept Colorectal Surg, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[2] Univ Hosp Dorset NHS Fdn Trust, Poole, Dorset, England
[3] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Hlth Sci & Social Work, Fac Sci, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[4] Queen Alexandra Hosp, Southwick Hill Rd, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, Hants, England
关键词
Robotic colorectal surgery; Complete mesocolic excision; Robotic ultrasound scan; Obese patients; COMPLETE MESOCOLIC EXCISION; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; BODY-MASS INDEX; COLON-CANCER; SUPRAPUBIC APPROACH; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; LIGATION; COLECTOMY; QUALITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-022-01398-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Complete mesocolic excision (CME) in right-sided colon cancers appears to confer oncological benefits compared to conventional colectomy. Identification of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) remains challenging. We describe the novel use of intra-operative robotic ultrasound scan (rUSS) in obese patients (BMI >= 29). All consecutive patients having robotic CME for colon cancer between 2014 and 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Data were recorded on an ethics approved prospective database and included patient demographics, clinical and oncological outcomes. Patients were divided into group 1 (BMI <= 28) and group 2 (BMI >= 29). SMV first approach was employed in all cases and SMV detection was aided using rUSS in group 2. Primary outcome was postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included conversion rate, operative time and length of stay (LOS). 41 (group 1, median 66 years) were compared to 32 patients (group 2, median 63 years). There were no conversions to laparoscopy or laparotomy. Median operative times for group 2 were 30 min longer (186 vs. 216 min, p = 0.05). Overall morbidity was similar (20% vs. 19% in group 1 and 2, p = 0.26). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to LOS (median 7 vs. 6 days, p = 0.48), readmissions (2 vs. 5, p = 0.13), R0 resection rate (98% vs. 94%, p = 0.43) and lymph node harvest (median 31 vs. 30, p = 0.28).CME can be technically more challenging than conventional colectomy in obese patients and is associated with longer operative times. The use of rUSS in obese patients can help to identify SMV and allow safer dissection.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 161
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using contrast-enhanced ultrasound scan to map renal blood flow
    Alenezi, Ahmad
    Motiwala, Aamir
    Eves, Susannah
    Gray, Rob
    Thomas, Asha
    Meiers, Isabelle
    Sharif, Haytham
    Motiwala, Hanif
    Laniado, Marc
    Karim, Omer
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2017, 13 (01)
  • [32] Robotic-assisted surgery for endometrial cancer is safe in morbidly and extremely morbidly obese patients
    Lechartier, Celine
    Bernard, Juliette
    Renaud, Marie-Claude
    Plante, Marie
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2023, 172 : 15 - 20
  • [33] Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumours in obese patients: Perioperative outcomes in a multi-institutional analysis
    Abdullah, Newaj
    Dalela, Deepansh
    Barod, Ravi
    Larson, Jeff
    Johnson, Michael
    Mass, Alon
    Zargar, Homayoun
    Allaf, Mohamad
    Bhayani, Sam
    Stifelman, Michael
    Kaouk, Jihad
    Rogers, Craig
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2015, 9 (11-12): : E859 - E862
  • [34] Outcomes of penile inversion vaginoplasty and robotic-assisted peritoneal flap vaginoplasty in obese and nonobese patients
    Acar, Omer
    Alcantar, Jonathan
    Millman, Alexandra
    Naha, Ushasi
    Cedeno, Juan Diego
    Morgantini, Luca
    Kocjancic, Ervin
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2023, 42 (05) : 939 - 946
  • [35] Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients - A comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates
    Chan, John K.
    Gardner, Austin B.
    Taylor, Katie
    Thompson, Caroline A.
    Blansit, Kevin
    Yu, Xinhua
    Kapp, Daniel S.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 139 (02) : 300 - 305
  • [36] Simultaneous robotic kidney transplantation and bariatric surgery for morbidly obese patients with end-stage renal failure
    Spaggiari, Mario
    Di Cocco, Pierpaolo
    Tulla, Kiara
    Kaylan, Kerim B.
    Masrur, Mario A.
    Hassan, Chandra
    Alvarez, Jorge A.
    Benedetti, Enrico
    Tzvetanov, Ivo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 21 (04) : 1525 - 1534
  • [37] Comparison of perioperative outcomes between non-obese and obese patients undergoing robotic inguinal hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis
    Kudsi, O. Y.
    Bou-Ayash, N.
    Gokcal, F.
    HERNIA, 2022, 26 (04) : 1033 - 1039
  • [38] Robotic vs. laparoscopic approach in obese patients with endometrial cancer: which is the best? A mini-review
    D'Auge, Tullio Golia
    Cuccu, Ilaria
    De Angelis, Emanuele
    Buzzaccarini, Giovanni
    D'Oria, Ottavia
    Besharat, Aris Raad
    Caserta, Donatella
    Muzii, Ludovico
    Bogani, Giorgio
    Di Donato, Violante
    Giannini, Andrea
    ONCOLOGIE, 2024, 26 (01) : 59 - 64
  • [39] Postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted lobectomy in obese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
    Casiraghi, Monica
    Sedda, Giulia
    Diotti, Cristina
    Mariolo, Alessio Vincenzo
    Galetta, Domenico
    Tessitore, Adele
    Maisonneuve, Patrick
    Spaggiari, Lorenzo
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 30 (03) : 359 - 365
  • [40] Surgical Merits of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Gastrectomy Techniques with D2 Lymphadenectomy in Obese Patients with Gastric Cancer
    Choi, Seohee
    Song, Jeong Ho
    Lee, Sejin
    Cho, Minah
    Kim, Yoo Min
    Hyung, Woo Jin
    Kim, Hyoung-Il
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (12) : 7051 - 7060