Robotic CME in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection

被引:6
|
作者
Maertens, Vicky [1 ]
Stefan, Samuel [1 ]
Mykoniatis, Ioannis [1 ]
Siddiqi, Najaf [2 ]
David, Gerald [1 ]
Khan, Jim S. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NHS Trust, Portsmouth Hosp Univ, Dept Colorectal Surg, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[2] Univ Hosp Dorset NHS Fdn Trust, Poole, Dorset, England
[3] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Hlth Sci & Social Work, Fac Sci, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[4] Queen Alexandra Hosp, Southwick Hill Rd, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, Hants, England
关键词
Robotic colorectal surgery; Complete mesocolic excision; Robotic ultrasound scan; Obese patients; COMPLETE MESOCOLIC EXCISION; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; BODY-MASS INDEX; COLON-CANCER; SUPRAPUBIC APPROACH; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; LIGATION; COLECTOMY; QUALITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-022-01398-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Complete mesocolic excision (CME) in right-sided colon cancers appears to confer oncological benefits compared to conventional colectomy. Identification of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) remains challenging. We describe the novel use of intra-operative robotic ultrasound scan (rUSS) in obese patients (BMI >= 29). All consecutive patients having robotic CME for colon cancer between 2014 and 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Data were recorded on an ethics approved prospective database and included patient demographics, clinical and oncological outcomes. Patients were divided into group 1 (BMI <= 28) and group 2 (BMI >= 29). SMV first approach was employed in all cases and SMV detection was aided using rUSS in group 2. Primary outcome was postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included conversion rate, operative time and length of stay (LOS). 41 (group 1, median 66 years) were compared to 32 patients (group 2, median 63 years). There were no conversions to laparoscopy or laparotomy. Median operative times for group 2 were 30 min longer (186 vs. 216 min, p = 0.05). Overall morbidity was similar (20% vs. 19% in group 1 and 2, p = 0.26). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to LOS (median 7 vs. 6 days, p = 0.48), readmissions (2 vs. 5, p = 0.13), R0 resection rate (98% vs. 94%, p = 0.43) and lymph node harvest (median 31 vs. 30, p = 0.28).CME can be technically more challenging than conventional colectomy in obese patients and is associated with longer operative times. The use of rUSS in obese patients can help to identify SMV and allow safer dissection.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 161
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal surgery in obese and morbidly obese patients: ACS-NSQIP analysis
    Albayati, Sinan
    Hitos, Kerry
    Berney, Christophe R.
    Morgan, Matthew J.
    Pathma-Nathan, Nimalan
    El-Khoury, Toufic
    Richardson, Arthur
    Chu, Daniel, I
    Cannon, Jamie
    Kennedy, Greg
    Toh, James Wei Tatt
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (02) : 637 - 643
  • [22] Robotic approach mitigates perioperative morbidity in obese patients following pancreaticoduodenectomy
    Girgis, Mark D.
    Zenati, Mazen S.
    Steve, Jennifer
    Bartlett, David L.
    Zureikat, Amer
    Zeh, Herbert J.
    Hogg, Melissa E.
    HPB, 2017, 19 (02) : 93 - 98
  • [23] Assessing the role of robotic proctectomy in obese patients: a contemporary NSQIP analysis
    Alexa C. Glencer
    Joseph A. Lin
    Karen Trang
    Anya Greenberg
    Kimberly S. Kirkwood
    Mohamed Abdelgadir Adam
    Ankit Sarin
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2022, 16 : 1391 - 1399
  • [24] Trust, Safety and Efficacy of Autonomous Robotic Ultrasound Vascular Imaging Collection on Human Subjects
    Oca, Siobhan R.
    Velasco, Juan Lasso
    Lindstrom, Kara
    Bridgeman, Leila J.
    Buckland, Daniel M.
    2024 33RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION, ROMAN 2024, 2024, : 1483 - 1490
  • [25] Outcomes of robotic surgery in morbidly obese patients with endometrial cancer: a retrospective study
    King, Luke J.
    Young, Amanda J.
    Nagar, Preeyanka M.
    McDowell, Jamie L.
    Smith, Ashlee L.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (03) : 569 - 573
  • [26] The impact of robotic colorectal surgery in obese patients: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
    Wee, Ian Jun Yan
    Kuo, Li-Jen
    Ngu, James Chi-Yong
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2019, 33 (11): : 3558 - 3566
  • [27] Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Overweight and Obese Patients: Oncological and Validated-Functional Outcomes
    Wiltz, Aimee L.
    Shikanov, Sergey
    Eggener, Scott E.
    Katz, Mark H.
    Thong, Alan E.
    Steinberg, Gary D.
    Shalhav, Arleh L.
    Zagaja, Gregory P.
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    UROLOGY, 2009, 73 (02) : 316 - 322
  • [28] Minimally Invasive Robotic Kidney Transplantation for Obese Patients Previously Denied Access to Transplantation
    Oberholzer, J.
    Giulianotti, P.
    Danielson, K. K.
    Spaggiari, M.
    Bejarano-Pineda, L.
    Bianco, F.
    Tzvetanov, I.
    Ayloo, S.
    Jeon, H.
    Garcia-Roca, R.
    Thielke, J.
    Tang, I.
    Akkina, S.
    Becker, B.
    Kinzer, K.
    Patel, A.
    Benedetti, E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 13 (03) : 721 - 728
  • [29] Comparing the outcomes of robotic vs. open partial nephrectomy in obese patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Wang, Yan-yan
    Xie, Zhen-ni
    Cao, Yi-qin
    Dai, Zhi-kai
    Ye, Hong-fang
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2025, 19 (01)
  • [30] Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Hysterectomy in Obese Patients With Early-stage Endometrial Cancer: A Single-centre Analysis
    Yoshida, Kenta
    Kondo, Eiji
    Nimura, Ryo
    Maki, Shintaro
    Kaneda, Michiko
    Nii, Masafumi
    Ikeda, Tomoaki
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 41 (08) : 4163 - 4167