Robotic CME in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection

被引:6
|
作者
Maertens, Vicky [1 ]
Stefan, Samuel [1 ]
Mykoniatis, Ioannis [1 ]
Siddiqi, Najaf [2 ]
David, Gerald [1 ]
Khan, Jim S. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NHS Trust, Portsmouth Hosp Univ, Dept Colorectal Surg, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[2] Univ Hosp Dorset NHS Fdn Trust, Poole, Dorset, England
[3] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Hlth Sci & Social Work, Fac Sci, Portsmouth, Hants, England
[4] Queen Alexandra Hosp, Southwick Hill Rd, Portsmouth PO6 3LY, Hants, England
关键词
Robotic colorectal surgery; Complete mesocolic excision; Robotic ultrasound scan; Obese patients; COMPLETE MESOCOLIC EXCISION; SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES; BODY-MASS INDEX; COLON-CANCER; SUPRAPUBIC APPROACH; SURGICAL OUTCOMES; LIGATION; COLECTOMY; QUALITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-022-01398-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Complete mesocolic excision (CME) in right-sided colon cancers appears to confer oncological benefits compared to conventional colectomy. Identification of the superior mesenteric vein (SMV) remains challenging. We describe the novel use of intra-operative robotic ultrasound scan (rUSS) in obese patients (BMI >= 29). All consecutive patients having robotic CME for colon cancer between 2014 and 2017 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Data were recorded on an ethics approved prospective database and included patient demographics, clinical and oncological outcomes. Patients were divided into group 1 (BMI <= 28) and group 2 (BMI >= 29). SMV first approach was employed in all cases and SMV detection was aided using rUSS in group 2. Primary outcome was postoperative morbidity. Secondary outcomes included conversion rate, operative time and length of stay (LOS). 41 (group 1, median 66 years) were compared to 32 patients (group 2, median 63 years). There were no conversions to laparoscopy or laparotomy. Median operative times for group 2 were 30 min longer (186 vs. 216 min, p = 0.05). Overall morbidity was similar (20% vs. 19% in group 1 and 2, p = 0.26). There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to LOS (median 7 vs. 6 days, p = 0.48), readmissions (2 vs. 5, p = 0.13), R0 resection rate (98% vs. 94%, p = 0.43) and lymph node harvest (median 31 vs. 30, p = 0.28).CME can be technically more challenging than conventional colectomy in obese patients and is associated with longer operative times. The use of rUSS in obese patients can help to identify SMV and allow safer dissection.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 161
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic CME in obese patients: advantage of robotic ultrasound scan for vascular dissection
    Vicky Maertens
    Samuel Stefan
    Ioannis Mykoniatis
    Najaf Siddiqi
    Gerald David
    Jim S. Khan
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 155 - 161
  • [2] Robotic assisted hysterectomy in obese patients: a systematic review
    Iavazzo, Christos
    Gkegkes, Ioannis D.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 293 (06) : 1169 - 1183
  • [3] Robotic surgery in supermorbidly obese patients with endometrial cancer
    Stephan, Jean-Marie
    Goodheart, Michael J.
    McDonald, Megan
    Hansen, Jean
    Reyes, Henry D.
    Button, Anna
    Bender, David
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (01)
  • [4] Obese patients and robotic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Suwa, Y.
    Joshi, M.
    Poynter, L.
    Endo, I.
    Ashrafian, H.
    Darzi, A.
    BJS OPEN, 2020, 4 (06): : 1042 - 1053
  • [5] Robotic colon surgery in obese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jason
    Johnson, Nicholas W.
    Casey, Laura
    Carne, Peter W. G.
    Bell, Stephen
    Chin, Martin
    Simpson, Paul
    Kong, Joseph C.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 93 (1-2) : 35 - 41
  • [6] Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in obese patients: a case-matched series
    Harr, Jeffrey N.
    Luka, Samuel
    Kankaria, Aman
    Juo, Yen-Yi
    Agarwal, Samir
    Obias, Vincent
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 31 (07): : 2813 - 2819
  • [7] Robotic surgery in endometrial cancer: Feasibility in, obese patients
    Planque, H.
    Martin-Francoise, S.
    Lequesne, J.
    Le Brun, J. F.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2018, 46 (09): : 625 - 631
  • [8] Robotic and Laparoscopic Approaches for Adrenal Surgery in Obese Patients
    Shalaby, Hosam
    Abdelgawad, Mohamed
    Omar, Mahmoud
    Zora, Ghassan
    Alawwad, Saad
    Alameer, Ehab
    Youssef, Mohanad
    Attia, Abdallah S.
    Buell, Joseph
    Grace, Lee
    Kandil, Emad
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2021, 87 (04) : 588 - 594
  • [9] Challenges of Robotic Gynecologic Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients and How to Optimize Success
    Menderes, Gulden
    Gysler, Stefan M.
    Vadivelu, Nalini
    Silasi, Dan-Arin
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2019, 23 (07)
  • [10] Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Outcomes in Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients
    Gallo, Taryn
    Kashani, Shabnam
    Patel, Divya A.
    Elsahwi, Karim
    Silasi, Dan-Arin
    Azodi, Masoud
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2012, 16 (03) : 421 - 427