Effects of environmental and task related conditions on postural control under concurrent visual feedback

被引:0
作者
Tasci, Seda [1 ]
Celik, Huseyin [2 ,3 ]
Kirazci, Sadettin [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle East Tech Univ, Fac Educ, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Sport Sci, Dept Biomech & Motor Control, Ankara, Turkiye
[3] Hacettepe Univ, Spor Bilimleri Fak, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Postural control; Concurrent visual feedback; Acquisition and retention; Postural sway; Entropy; OF-PRESSURE TRAJECTORIES; BALANCE TASKS; SWAY; YOUNG; QUANTIFICATION; RELIABILITY; FREQUENCY; ENTROPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.humov.2024.103186
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: Previous studies have yielded conflicting results on the facilitative effects of concurrent visual feedback (CVFB) on postural control. In addition, these effects have generally been assessed only during a single postural task, and their scope has been limited to training sessions in the acquisition phase but not in the later retention phase. One explanation for these conflicting results is that assessing postural control during a single postural task, such as quiet stance, may not be sufficiently challenging for the postural control system to infer balance abilities. We aimed to address these shortcomings by diversifying postural tasks and environmental conditions and by including acquisition and retention phases in the experiments. Research questions: Does the provision of CVFB of the instantaneous COP position improve performance on a variety of postural tasks compared to no-CVFB controls? Are the effects of the CVFB retained the following day? Do the observed effect sizes differ in magnitude between the environmental and task conditions under CVFB? Methods: Forty healthy young adults were randomly assigned to CVFB and no-CVFB control groups. The subjects performed three postural tasks: quiet, tandem, and single-leg stance, under two environmental conditions based on the stiffness of the supporting ground surface. Seven measures of postural sway, including ellipse area, mean speed, and sample entropy, were examined. Results: The provision of CVFB significantly increased sample entropy and sway-path length of the normalized posturogram. In addition, ellipse area, standard deviation of resultant distance, and range in the anteroposterior direction were significantly reduced in the CVFB group compared to the no-CVFB controls; however, these effects were not retained the following day without the addition of CVFB augmentation. The postural sway measures under CVFB were affected by task and environmental constraints, with varying effect sizes. Significance: This study demonstrated environment and task-specific changes in postural sway measures under CVFB, which facilitated postural control in a variety of postural tasks. Providing CVFB significantly increased sample entropy, indicating less regular postural sway. The features of CVFB that attract external attention and reduce cognitive overload are possible explanations for these findings.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Quantification and reliability of center of pressure movement during balance tasks of varying difficulty
    Baltich, Jennifer
    von Tscharner, Vinzenz
    Zandiyeh, Payam
    Nigg, Benno M.
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2014, 40 (02) : 327 - 332
  • [2] Relation between postural control assessment with eyes open and centre of pressure visual feedback effects in healthy individuals
    Boudrahem, Samir
    Rougier, Patrice R.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2009, 195 (01) : 145 - 152
  • [3] Carter R.E., 2016, REHABILITATION RES P, V5th
  • [4] To what extent can increasing the magnification of visual feedback of the centre of pressure position change the control of quiet standing balance?
    Cawsey, Ryan P.
    Chua, Romeo
    Carpenter, Mark G.
    Sanderson, David J.
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2009, 29 (02) : 280 - 284
  • [5] Multisensory postural control in adults: Variation in visual, haptic, and proprioceptive inputs
    Cheung, Theodore C. K.
    Schmuckler, Mark A.
    [J]. HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 2021, 79
  • [6] Exercise and Physical Activity for Older Adults
    Chodzko-Zajko, Wojtek J.
    Proctor, David N.
    Singh, Maria A. Fiatarone
    Minson, Christopher T.
    Nigg, Claudio R.
    Salem, George J.
    Skinner, James S.
    [J]. MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2009, 41 (07) : 1510 - 1530
  • [7] Postural control in healthy individuals
    Clifford, Amanda Marie
    Holder-Powell, Heather
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2010, 25 (06) : 546 - 551
  • [8] Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, V2nd
  • [9] The Effect of Continuous and Discretized Presentations of Concurrent Augmented Visual Biofeedback on Postural Control in Quiet Stance
    D'Anna, Carmen
    Schmid, Maurizio
    Bibbo, Daniele
    Bertollo, Maurizio
    Comani, Silvia
    Conforto, Silvia
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [10] Is voluntary control of natural postural sway possible?
    Danna-Dos-Santos, Alessander
    Degani, Adriana Menezes
    Zatsiorsky, Vladimir M.
    Latash, Mark L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 2008, 40 (03) : 179 - 185