Diagnostic Accuracy of Hand-Held Fundus Camera and Artificial Intelligence in Diabetic Retinopathy Screening

被引:5
作者
Tomic, Martina [1 ]
Vrabec, Romano [1 ]
Hendelja, Durdica [1 ]
Kolaric, Vilma [2 ]
Bulum, Tomislav [2 ,3 ]
Rahelic, Dario [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Merkur Univ Hosp, Vuk Vrhovac Univ Clin Diabet Endocrinol & Metab Di, Dept Ophthalmol, Dugi dol 4a, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[2] Merkur Univ Hosp, Vuk Vrhovac Univ Clin Diabet Endocrinol & Metab Di, Dept Diabet & Endocrinol, Dugi dol 4a, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[3] Univ Zagreb, Sch Med, Salata 3, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[4] Catholic Univ Croatia, Sch Med, Ilica 242, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[5] Josip Juraj Strossmayer Univ, Sch Med, Josipa Huttlera 4, Osijek 31000, Croatia
关键词
diabetic retinopathy; screening; slit-lamp fundoscopy; fundus camera; artificial intelligence; TELEMEDICINE; BLINDNESS;
D O I
10.3390/biomedicines12010034
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Our study aimed to assess the role of a hand-held fundus camera and artificial intelligence (AI)-based grading system in diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening and determine its diagnostic accuracy in detecting DR compared with clinical examination and a standard fundus camera. This cross-sectional instrument validation study, as a part of the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Project, included 160 patients (320 eyes) with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). After the standard indirect slit-lamp fundoscopy, each patient first underwent fundus photography with a standard 45 degrees camera VISUCAM Zeiss and then with a hand-held camera TANG (Shanghai Zhi Tang Health Technology Co., Ltd.). Two retina specialists independently graded the images taken with the standard camera, while the images taken with the hand-held camera were graded using the DeepDR system and an independent IDF ophthalmologist. The three screening methods did not differ in detecting moderate/severe nonproliferative and proliferative DR. The area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, kappa (kappa) agreement, diagnostic odds ratio, and diagnostic effectiveness for a hand-held camera compared to clinical examination were 0.921, 89.1%, 100%, 100%, 91.4%, infinity, 0.11, 0.86, 936.48, and 94.9%, while compared to the standard fundus camera were 0.883, 83.2%, 100%, 100%, 87.3%, infinity, 0.17, 0.78, 574.6, and 92.2%. The results of our study suggest that fundus photography with a hand-held camera and AI-based grading system is a short, simple, and accurate method for the screening and early detection of DR, comparable to clinical examination and fundus photography with a standard camera.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Diabetic retinopathy screening: a short guide
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, FDA permits marketing of artificial intelligence algorithm for aiding providers in detecting wrist fractures
[3]   Demystifying Deep Learning Models for Retinal OCT Disease Classification using Explainable AI [J].
Apon, Tasnim Sakib ;
Hasan, Mohammad Mahmudul ;
Islam, Abrar ;
Alam, Md Golam Rabiul .
2021 IEEE ASIA-PACIFIC CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND DATA ENGINEERING (CSDE), 2021,
[4]  
Atlas D., 2015, IDF Diabetes Atlas, V33
[5]   The Value of Automated Diabetic Retinopathy Screening with the EyeArt System: A Study of More Than 100,000 Consecutive Encounters from People with Diabetes [J].
Bhaskaranand, Malavika ;
Ramachandra, Chaithanya ;
Bhat, Sandeep ;
Cuadros, Jorge ;
Nittala, Muneeswar G. ;
Sadda, Srinivas R. ;
Solanki, Kaushal .
DIABETES TECHNOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 21 (11) :635-643
[6]  
Boucher Marie Carole, 2020, JMIR Diabetes, V5, pe17309, DOI 10.2196/17309
[7]   Effectiveness and safety of screening for diabetic retinopathy with two nomnydriatic digital images compared with the seven standard stereoscopic photographic fields [J].
Boucher, MC ;
Gresset, JA ;
Angioi, K ;
Olivier, S .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2003, 38 (07) :557-568
[8]  
Connolly A, 2001, Nurs Times, V97, P40
[9]   Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990-2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Flaxman, Seth R. ;
Bourne, Rupert R. A. ;
Resnikoff, Serge ;
Ackland, Peter ;
Braithwaite, Tasanee ;
Cicinelli, Maria V. ;
Das, Aditi ;
Jonas, Jost B. ;
Keeffe, Jill ;
Kempen, John H. ;
Leasher, Janet ;
Limburg, Hans ;
Naidoo, Kovin ;
Pesudovs, Konrad ;
Silvester, Alex ;
Stevens, Gretchen A. ;
Tahhan, Nina ;
Wong, Tien Y. ;
Taylor, Hugh R. .
LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2017, 5 (12) :E1221-E1234
[10]   Non-mydriatic fundus photography as an alternative to indirect ophthalmoscopy for screening of diabetic retinopathy in community settings: a comparative pilot study in rural and tribal India [J].
Gajiwala, Uday R. ;
Pachchigar, Swapnil ;
Patel, Dhaval ;
Mistry, Ishwar ;
Oza, Yash ;
Kundaria, Dhaval ;
Shamanna, B. R. .
BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04)